Jump to content

Upcoming ISP "Assault Weapons" registration on October 1st, 2023


george13

Recommended Posts

On 10/2/2023 at 12:28 PM, Vodoun da Vinci said:

Perhaps so....we'll see.

 

VooDoo

 

I believe VooDoo is correct. They are going to want to make examples out of people to show the law is working.  Especially after only a tiny percentage of people register their stuff. 

 

If IL gets away with the 5th amendment violation, they'll amend the FOID act to require us to waive our 4th amendment rights to privacy to obtain a FOID so that police can do random compliance searches. 

 

It is time for people to stop assuming this was done out of stupidity or ignorance.  Time for people to realize that this was all done because they have terrible intentions. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2023 at 12:22 PM, Tip said:

Never attribute to deliberate actions or intent that which is easily explained by ignorance or stupidity.

Methinks you are reading way more intent into this than is actually there. This law was drafted by those completely ignorant of the subject matter and it clearly shows.

If this law was written by Illinois’ leadership in a vacuum, I’d side with you as many of are truly “a special kind of stupid”.  However, it seems as if the law was built on a foundation carefully crafted by the gun ban groups and then somewhat obfuscated by the ignorant rulers in IL who choose to dictate to us.  
 

I cannot assume ignorance from the “control” groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything trying to make examples will just expedite the court's overthrow. As it stands the precedent is that the southern district HAS ruled this unconstitutional but Eastercrook just threw a wrench into the injunction while the state appeals.

 

 

Also remember the 11th Commandment "Thou shalt not ask gubmint employee to do more work". Best part about most of these modern communists is that they are lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GSL announced 

 

 

 

 

Quote

 We’re told that on or about December 5th, the governor will announce a 78% compliance rate to the gun registration scheme currently underway in the Land of Lincoln.  He’ll urge the remaining gun owners to go ahead and register their guns before the end of the year.

Folks, it’s all just be a bald-faced lie.  At that point it will all be about psychological operations to coax gun owners to register their guns, mags and accessories.  “Peer pressure” in simpler terms.

https://www.gunssavelife.com/2023/10/04/coming-on-or-about-december-5-gov-pritzker-78-compliance-rate-on-gun-registration/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ex Post Facto means nothing to these people. It's amazing that a congress at both levels, filled with lawyers, ignore the constitution as freely as they do. 

 

Things made illegal by the stroke of a pen, that were legal for decades. Meanwhile, criminals can't be forced to register, since it would make them bear witness against themselves. But regular, completely legal gun owners, line up and sign up, citizen. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2023 at 11:21 AM, Yas said:

 

Their "sources" in JB's inner circle? False flag operators maybe. I seriously doubt that the 2A side has a mole in JB's inner circle.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2023 at 10:22 AM, dukemason said:

Does anyone know what accessories they expect people to register? Flash hiders, stocks, grips, spare parts/barrels? The law offers no examples, from what I can tell.

 

All of the above, stripped lowers, uppers, charging handles - pretty much anything that can be used to build a rifle.  I'd even include backup iron sights in that. 

 

Some people are saying banned mags need to be registered, but the ISP website Q/A page for PICA states they do not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2023 at 12:16 PM, davel501 said:

We need to come up with a way to quickly reference the various laws within threads. It's so painful to go look them up every time.

 

For the "Misleading sheep into thinking Illinois is Protected" act? https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/102/PDF/102-1116.pdf

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/2/2023 at 1:26 PM, Dumak_from_arfcom said:

 

If IL gets away with the 5th amendment violation, they'll amend the FOID act to require us to waive our 4th amendment rights to privacy to obtain a FOID so that police can do random compliance searches. 

 

I am quite sure your prediction is correct.  Other possible enhancements to the IL Donks gun control regime could be an annual fine of $200 per registered banned gun.   And a transportation ban so banned guns cannot be taken to the range.  And simultaneous possession of ammo for the gun to be a felony.  They will likely amend and enhance the statute to say banned guns can no longer be passed by inheritance to anyone.  They will make it a felony to sell banned guns out of state.  They will certainly publish the names and addresses of everyone who registers.   They will make possession even in the home of mags over 10 rounds a felony like in California thus forcing people to modify and block existing mags.  They will make it a felony to attempt to purchase 5.56 

233 ammo unless you are law enforcement or retired Leo.  They will do civil asset forfeiture to take the home owned where they find an unregistered banned gun. They will change the criminal penalty for a first offense to a mandatory 3 year prison sentence.

 

They would enjoy total destruction of any person caught with an unregistered banned gun.  Really, the sky is the limit with the gun hating Donks in Springfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...