bmyers

When did it become law that you must have an email address to sell a firearm?

Also, for those of you looking for ways to donate to SAF, you can do that via Amazon Smile and a percentage of your purchases is donated to SAF. It isn't a large amount, but pennies add up.

I think the SAf, GOA, and our own Illinois Carry Forum are all good places to look at donating to support the 2nd.

My understanding is that directly, none of these cases will affect Illinois since none of them are in our District. Yet, indirectly, they will affect all districts because SCOTUS has told them their decisions were wrong and do over. This puts ever district on notice of what the expectations are from SCOTUS. Now, as we know some judges feel that they are above the law/are the law and will make decisions based on what they want and then will have to be smacked down by a higher court. All theses cases will be citable to my understanding since SCOTUS passed judgement on them, so they do affect our circuit. Maybe someone way smarter than me can come along and explain it better.

Texasgrillchef posted a link to the decision https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-1639.html

Thank you! Learned something new today.

20-1507 ASSN. OF NJ RIFLE, ET AL. V. BRUCK, ATT'Y GEN. OF NJ, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. ___ (2022). 21-1194 DUNCAN, VIRGINIA, ET AL. V. BONTA, ATT'Y GEN. OF CA The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. ___ (2022). 21-902 BIANCHI, DOMINIC, ET AL. V. FROSH, ATT'Y GEN. OF MD, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. ___ (2022). I didn't se anything listed for Young 20-1639 YOUNG, GEORGE K. V. HAWAII, ET AL.

This may be what you are looking for https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/063022zor_5he6.pdf

Thanks for the update.

I've looked, but not seen any updates, yet those with more skills in legal matters may know where to find them better than I.

It will be interesting to see how they try to get around it.

Thank you!

What were the four cases? I have seen a list, but can't find it right now and was hoping you could point me in the right direction. Thanks

I will be curious to see how citizens from one State are denied their Constitutional Right in another State and that stands up in Federal Court. Your right to free speech or to attend whatever church you would like, doesn't change when you cross a State border, so why does your Right to bear arms change?

NY Governor already been on tv, she is calling a special session so they can declare what are sensitive zones. I think she listed everywhere, but your home.

I like Alito's response to the dissent In light of what we have actually held, it is hard to see what legitimate purpose can possibly be served by most of the dissent’s lengthy introductory section. See post, at 1–8 (opinion of BREYER, J.). Why, for example, does the dissent think it is relevant to recount the mass shootings that have occurred in recent years? Post, at 4–5. Does the dissent think that laws like New York’s prevent or deter such atrocities? Will a person bent on carrying out a mass shooting be stopped if he knows that it is illegal to carry a handgun outside the home? And how does the dissent account for the fact that one of the mass shootings near the top of its list took place in Buffalo? The New York law at issue in this case obviously did not stop that perpetrator. What is the relevance of statistics about the use of guns to commit suicide? See post, at 5–6. Does the dissent think that a lot of people who possess guns in their homes will be stopped or deterred from shooting themselves if they cannot lawfully take them outside? (Pg 71 of the PDF)

I wonder if a challenge will be brought for a State limiting the ability of a person to carry in another State?

So does this have any effect on IL carry? Does the current State law set an unreasonable high standard since you have to go through 16 hours of training (which cost) and pay $150 license fee?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-shoots-down-ny-rule-set-high-bar-concealed-handgun-licenses An article on Foxnews if you don't want to read the full 135 pages of the opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

My guess is that all the Justices are already out of town or heading that away. It may not even be the Justices' own idea, but the security staff may be telling them that they need to go on a vacation for a week or two with their family. Yet, I have no great insight, just my thoughts.

You beat me to it. I was just checking the calendar and seen that they had updated it.

+1

If they follow their calendar, then it will be the 23rd, which is the last day they have scheduled to release opinions. Looking through the rest of the year, they follow the traditional pattern and don't start back up till October and that is when the next items are on the calendar after the order list of the 27th.

Correct, that was what I was looking at when I posted that it wasn't released today.