Sigma Posted April 10, 2023 at 12:51 PM Posted April 10, 2023 at 12:51 PM Can a person store their firearms in state and be "not in possesion" or does he have to take it out of state
Lou Posted April 10, 2023 at 01:38 PM Posted April 10, 2023 at 01:38 PM On 4/9/2023 at 10:02 PM, JTHunter said: I have posted Todd's videos in three other forums I frequent. It has definitely raised the ire of some in those forums, both for the stupidity of the ILGA and the vague broadness of the language in the law. A part of me thinks that it is not the stupidity of the ILGA writing the laws in such a vague manner. I think it is on purpose to get things interpreted by the ISP in a way that they could not get passed if it were spelled out in the bill.
Euler Posted April 10, 2023 at 04:10 PM Posted April 10, 2023 at 04:10 PM On 4/10/2023 at 8:51 AM, Sigma said: Can a person store their firearms in state and be "not in possesion" or does he have to take it out of state As long as you know where they are and have access to them, you possess them. The state's jurisdiction extends to its boundaries. If you want your firearms to escape Illinois law, they need to be outside Illinois.
Upholder Posted April 12, 2023 at 01:55 AM Author Posted April 12, 2023 at 01:55 AM I am stuck all tomorrow afternoon in meetings. Would someone please summarize as the proceedings um, proceed? 😃
Euler Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:00 AM Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:00 AM (edited) The defendants have filed the denial of a federal preliminary injunction in the Delaware case Delaware State Sportsmen's Association v Delaware (docket) as an advisory authority in this case. To grant a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs have to show that: it is possible for the case to succeed on its merits; the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm without an injunction; the "balance of equities" favors the plaintiff; and an injunction serves the public interest. The judge in the Delaware case asserted: that "assault weapons" are not used commonly for self-defense, but are used commonly for mass shootings, therefore they are not covered by the Second Amendment, and the case is not likely to succeed; and that suspension of Second Amendment civil liberties for limited periods does not cause irreparable harm; furthermore the Second Amendment does not protect a right to sell firearms. Since the first two conditions are recognized as the most important ones, and because (the judge ruled) the plaintiffs had not satisfied them, he denied the injunction. Edited April 12, 2023 at 02:02 AM by Euler
Euler Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:04 AM Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:04 AM On 4/11/2023 at 9:55 PM, Upholder said: I am stuck all tomorrow afternoon in meetings. Would someone please summarize as the proceedings um, proceed? I'll probably listen and summarize. Oral arguments tend to be short, so there isn't a need to post real-time updates.
springfield shooter Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:25 AM Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:25 AM On 4/11/2023 at 9:00 PM, Euler said: The defendants have filed the denial of a federal preliminary injunction in the Delaware case Delaware State Sportsmen's Association v Delaware (docket) as an advisory authority in this case. To grant a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs have to show that: it is possible for the case to succeed on its merits; the plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm without an injunction; the "balance of equities" favors the plaintiff; and an injunction serves the public interest. The judge in the Delaware case asserted: that "assault weapons" are not used commonly for self-defense, but are used commonly for mass shootings, therefore they are not covered by the Second Amendment, and the case is not likely to succeed; and that suspension of Second Amendment civil liberties for limited periods does not cause irreparable harm; furthermore the Second Amendment does not protect a right to sell firearms. Since the first two conditions are recognized as the most important ones, and because (the judge ruled) the plaintiffs had not satisfied them, he denied the injunction. The judge in the above case is an Obama appointee.
THE KING Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:31 AM Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:31 AM On 4/11/2023 at 9:25 PM, springfield shooter said: The judge in the above case is an Obama appointee. And an idiot.
JTHunter Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:38 AM Posted April 12, 2023 at 02:38 AM On 4/10/2023 at 8:38 AM, Lou said: A part of me thinks that it is not the stupidity of the ILGA writing the laws in such a vague manner. I think it is on purpose to get things interpreted by the ISP in a way that they could not get passed if it were spelled out in the bill. Oh, I agree with you. I just didn't want to put it out there like that.
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:07 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:07 PM I assume nobody else has audio beyond the elevator music?
Black Flag Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:09 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:09 PM On 4/11/2023 at 8:09 PM, Molly B. said: Nothing going on yet
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:11 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:11 PM (edited) Conferenced ended! Nothing happened. I rejoined. Edited April 12, 2023 at 06:12 PM by AlphaKoncepts aka CGS
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:16 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:16 PM It looks like it was changed to 1:30 on the calendar.
mauserme Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:49 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:49 PM I just joined the call and got a message saying the host has not yet arrived.
cbunt32 Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:51 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:51 PM On 4/12/2023 at 1:49 PM, mauserme said: I just joined the call and got a message saying the host has not yet arrived. Greg Bishop is live tweeting it. Not sure why we can't listen in
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:52 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:52 PM He is at the court house.
JamesW Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:53 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:53 PM On 4/12/2023 at 1:51 PM, cbunt32 said: Greg Bishop is live tweeting it. Not sure why we can't listen in Link?
bmyers Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:58 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:58 PM On 4/12/2023 at 1:57 PM, Black Flag said: Waste of an hour Why? What happened?
mauserme Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:58 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 06:58 PM I was just told the conference ended.
Euler Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:00 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:00 PM On 4/12/2023 at 2:51 PM, cbunt32 said: ... Not sure why we can't listen in Maybe McGlynn is one of those judges who doesn't like spectators. On 4/12/2023 at 2:58 PM, mauserme said: I was just told the conference ended. It does that every few minutes.
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:00 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:00 PM On 4/12/2023 at 1:58 PM, mauserme said: I was just told the conference ended. I signed in 5 to 1 and got "conference ended" message at least 3 times. I have not called back as the hearing has begun and is obvious it is not being broadcast. I wonder if it is not being broadcast because biden ended the covid restrictions.
Black Flag Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:02 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:02 PM On 4/12/2023 at 1:58 PM, bmyers said: Why? What happened? Nothing happened, on the conf line. Nothing happened for an hour. Therefore it was a wasted hour.
steveTA84 Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM (edited) If what is being reported play by play is accurate, I’m not to impressed with Murphy (plaintiff lawyer), as she seems to be making the case for the antis a bit. Argued “dangerous OR unusual” and made the case that large firearms (like .50’s?) are not in common use Edited April 12, 2023 at 07:06 PM by steveTA84
bmyers Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM (edited) On 4/12/2023 at 2:02 PM, Black Flag said: Nothing happened, on the conf line. Nothing happened for an hour. Therefore it was a wasted hour. Oh okay, I thought something happened in the case, but right now it is everyone dealing with the connection issues. Thanks for the clarification. Edited April 12, 2023 at 07:05 PM by bmyers
Dumak_from_arfcom Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:04 PM Bishop on Air live tweets...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:06 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:06 PM On 4/12/2023 at 2:04 PM, steveTA84 said: If what is being reported play by play is accurate, I’m not to impressed with Murphy (plaintiff lawyer), as she seems to be making the case for the antis a bit I agree but will reserve judgement until I see a transcript or video.
Dumak_from_arfcom Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:14 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:14 PM On 4/12/2023 at 2:04 PM, steveTA84 said: If what is being reported play by play is accurate, I’m not to impressed with Murphy (plaintiff lawyer), as she seems to be making the case for the antis a bit Murphy was getting dragged into a this or that argument. .50 cal, grenade launchers, machine guns. Judging by the questions being asked by the judge, it looks to me like the judge is looking for an opening to interest balance.
MRE Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:19 PM Posted April 12, 2023 at 07:19 PM (edited) On 4/12/2023 at 2:14 PM, Dumak_from_arfcom said: Murphy was getting dragged into a this or that argument. .50 cal, grenade launchers, machine guns. Judging by the questions being asked by the judge, it looks to me like the judge is looking for an opening to interest balance. I would caution against reading too much into questions a judge asks at hearing. I say this because many judges ask questions to play devils advocate, even of arguments they end up agreeing with. Some treat it as almost an academic exercise to test the knowledge of counsel and the veracity of their beliefs, similar to a law school class. Edited April 12, 2023 at 07:21 PM by MRE
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now