Jump to content

THE KING

Members
  • Posts

    3,336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by THE KING

  1. I think this is another overreach by the ISP. Just like when they attempted to make the "hits on target " on the B27 silhouette inside the 7 ring. The way I read and interpret (a-25) is that the ISP is supposed to be compiling a list of serial numbers in a database for US to search. Not us inputting serial numbers for them to establish a database. Another reason I think the EPA ruling should apply to the ISP.
  2. Color me silly but if they're asking for that much information then why does the seller have to keep their documentation for 10 years and why does the buyer have to find an FFL to keep theirs for 20 years. This is so stupid .
  3. 👍 I sure hope there's alot of suits being drawn up in Illinois. Thanks for the update
  4. Do you have a link to those opinions. I can see people's heads exploding now.🤣🤣🤣🤣
  5. If I may ask, what is the purpose of posting all of these amici briefs
  6. I'm curious about the "substantially similar " language and the lack of reciprocity amongst the states. Crossing a state line voids your second amendment right if there's no reciprocity. I think and hope this gets challenged.
  7. Hey Todd V After you have had time to read and digest this opinion. Would you be willing to share your thoughts with us on where you think area's of Illinois law could be challenged and overturned. KING
  8. I am not making any assumptions. I clarified your statement as being incorrect, which it is. I'm also not going to get into the "what if" discussion. I suggest you read that law and then do whatever you want to do.
  9. You are completely wrong about this. You need to read HB4383 which was signed into law on 5/18/22. As of that date it is illegal to offer for sale or sell an unserialized receiver. Doesn't matter whether it's an 80% or finished receiver. The penalty is a class 4 felony.
  10. I see that as handguns and long guns could be carried also. Which questions conceal carry vs open carry.
  11. I was thinking this same thing. But a screen like this will just make people look behind it. Then I thought, go to an appliance store and see if you can get a couple of refrigerator boxes. Slide them over the top and voila. Covered.😁
  12. Exactly We also need to vote Tom Devore in as Illinois Attorney General. I saw him on the news this morning and his stance is that the FOID ACT is unconstitutional. He also said that as AG he would not oppose any lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of the FOID.
  13. Yep, same thoughts I have. Their analysis of the legislative intent actually raises more questions than answers. What about your own land. How about your legal dwelling. Or your fixed place of business. Where is the line going to be drawn. Why did they limit it to the home. When you start thinking about 24-1, the UUW statute. How does this precedent affect that or does it. 🤬🤬
  14. I see the problem being with paragraph 6 of this written opinion. The circuit Court dismissed the case based on their analysis of legislative intent of the FOID act. They believe that the intent was that a FOID card is not required in the home. Therefore Ms Brown apparently didn't have to challenge the constitutionally of the FOID act as her case was dismissed. To me I disagree with the circuit courts opinion on the legislative intent. The FOID act is pretty clear on the requirement of having a FOID card in this State. Plus the home is not listed in the exemption section of 65-2 of the FOID act. IANAL nor a constitutional scholar. Just my humble opinion on what I read.
  15. Read the dissenting opinion from Justice Michael Burke. I think he's spot on when he writes about the errors of the majority and the appeals process. The majority stated that their ruling was final and can not be challenged, but then say that the appellate court has the ability to review the case.???
  16. Yep and we won't hear a damn thing about this on the MSM. 🤬
  17. Yeah, I saw that too. What an idiot. Unfortunately there are some who will believe him. 🙄
×
×
  • Create New...