THE KING

Todd is the former NRA lobbyist that worked in the Illinois General Assembly. He's heavily involved with the litigation of the lawsuits in Illinois on the 2nd Amendment cases. Great guy to have on your side.

And now the 5th circuit withdraws their previous opinion. 👍 I see this as a big win for us.

What a bunch of BS

Any updates on these cases ?

https://youtu.be/3-3a1owEWj8?si=drCZ0FAlhmw7njwL

Good question. I have referred alot of my students to District 5 for help with their applications and/or renewals. Most if not all of them have either called or went to District 5 for help and nobody has ever been there in the office or even answered the phone. If you find out would you please let the rest of us know. Thanks

Looks like his shawl says something about "black history " 🤔

Any updates on this case. Has the state asked for a stay or are they just going to ignore the judges opinion.

Very well written. I guess we'll see how fast the state moves to get a judge to put a stay on this order

Yep 👍

Yep, but it's Chiraq. I'm surprised anyone got charged. 😳

Just filled mine out. In the mail tomorrow. Good luck bro.

Just saw this. https://youtu.be/qOLhqGL_QbE?si=6GzRhJsdUfoZlaOW

I really want to see CA4 opinion in this case. CA5 just released their opinion in Reese v ATF on the prohibition of 18 to 20 year olds and they found that the prohibition violates the 2nd Amendment and is unconstitutional.

https://youtu.be/OcuROFfbgcA?si=sRfIGY4OIzN3qcwE

🤣🤣 state filed their appeal before 5:00 yesterday just after the ruling came out. Amazing they have time to file an appeal that quick but always need more time to delay a case.

🤣🤣🤣

👍 that's awesome

The standards and specifications for use of guns and bow and arrow for deer hunting shall be established by administrative rule. No person may have in his or her possession any firearm not authorized by administrative rule for a specific hunting season when taking deer unless in accordance with the Firearm Concealed Carry Act. The above is from 520 ILCS 5/2.26 This seems vague, but they talk about guns and bows and go on to call out "a specific hunting season ". My impression is that a specific hunting season would include either gun or bow. I'd be curious what the "legislative intent " is from the legislative discussions when this was changed.

It shall be unlawful to take wild turkey except by use of a bow and arrow or a shotgun of not larger than 10 nor smaller than 20 gauge with shot size not larger than No. 4, and no person while attempting to so take wild turkey may have in his possession any other gun unless in accordance with the Firearm Concealed Carry Act. The above is from 520 ILCS 5/2.11 and my interpretation is that you can have your EDC whether you are hunting with bow or shotgun.

I resemble that remark. 🤣

I hear ya John Q. Sounds like the DNR officers need to be educated on the law and they need to update their website. Let us know what you find out. Thanks

Read my response to the OP. The DNR website is not law. I did quote the actual wildlife statute which is state law. 👍