steveTA84

Awwww poor Everytown lol

GOA is going for it on their case too that got an injunction

https://secure.anedot.com/firearmspolicycoalition/march2023_joingaw?sc=joingaw

Member of FPC? You are exempt from the ATF ruling

Yes

Same on my end.

FPC requesting clarification. Might not be a bad time to join them for $30 if you’re not a member already

Filing a complaint is easy and just takes a few minutes.

No lol

Not finding a contact that deals with it, so unsure

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_244b63da-f68f-11ed-a8a0-d7ae25baa649.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share With the Illinois Supreme Court considering the constitutional challenge to the state’s gun and magazine ban, concerns around judicial integrity persist. Last year, two sitting Illinois’ Supreme Court justices were candidates for the bench when they each received $1 million to their campaign committees from Gov. J.B. Pritzker. After the election and now on the bench, Justices Elizabeth Rochford and Mary O’Brien denied a motion for their recusal in the gun ban challenge brought against Pritzker by state Rep. Dan Caulkins, R-Decatur. The court could rule on the gun ban challenge in the weeks ahead. “If we see how the ruling is and the ruling is adverse, we just have to measure and evaluate at that time,” Stocks said. He stood by his complaint in the recusal motion and suggested he could seek a challenge in the federal courts based on previous U.S. Supreme Court precedent. “And [the 2009 Caperton v. Massey U.S. Supreme Court case] says that a court of review must accord due process in the context of freedom of bias and prejudice in an issue, or appearance of it,” Stocks said.

GSL made it super easy to file complaints with the IL Judiciary Inquiry Board to get Rochford and O’Brien removed https://www.gunssavelife.com/take-bold-action-file-your-complaint-with-the-illinois-judicial-inquiry-board/

For now they did, I think this is all far from over

This opens yet another can of worms, and adds to the war chest if his judges do what we suspect they’ll do. This is SCOTUS bound if Caulkins and Stocks have balls, because remember, Pritzker did an underhand to give each justice double what was allowed just to benefit him