Jump to content

Lou

Supporting Team I
  • Posts

    14,971
  • Joined

Everything posted by Lou

  1. As they say in the IT world; that isn't a bug, it’s a feature.
  2. A bit more on the new too-cute-by-half NY law. Anyone wanna guess how long it will take to get an appointment with a “licensing officer”? And three years worth of social media to verify just what exactly? Creates a permitting process for concealed carry. Applicants for a concealed-carry permit must meet in-person with a licensing officer for an interview to determine character and trustworthiness to handle a firearm. During the interview, an applicant must disclose the names of any partners, minors, or cohabitants who share a residence, they must provide at least four character references, certify completion of required training, certify that they have no convictions for disqualifying offenses, and provide a list of all social media accounts for the last three years to be reviewed by licensing authorities for verification purposes.
  3. (Hopefully the ISP isn’t reading this ) BUT the initial page asks if you want to verify a FOID for a firearms sale or an ammunition sale. If you use the ammunition sale page you just put in the buyers FOID info. iANAL and I am not encouraging anyone to break the law but if the requirement is to check the FOID validity you have done that by running it through the Ammo section. Then again, I am not willing to be a test subject.
  4. Oohhh. I certainly don’t like that. I’ve got a S& W up for sale but now I’m considering taking it down.
  5. In the past when I shipped parts UPS I would usually answer “motorcycle parts” if asked what was inside. Not always honest but it saved a lot of unnecessary conflict.
  6. Which gave us President Obama. And we can thank the Chicago Libune for suing to release the divorce records for Jack Ryan.
  7. The Illinois red flag law that went into effect in 2019 is especially egregious. PA 100-0607 Here is an example of a law that is clearly unconstitutional This passage in section 45 is the worst in my opinion: (1) The respondent shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent does not pose a danger of causing personal injury to himself, herself, or another in the near future by having in his or her custody or control, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm. 1. How do you prove a negative, that you are NOT a danger? 2. Presumed guilty until you can prove you innocence.
  8. Illinois has had a (terrible) red flag law since 2019. It is about an unconstitutional as they could make it. Look at how well it has worked in Chicago. /Sarcasm off\.
  9. I had an interesting conversation with a left leaning friend last week. His comment was he couldn’t vote for some farmer that “talks like that.” I mentioned that that farmer is a millionaire if you count the value of his land. A modern day farmer is also a businessman who has to buy combines and other equipment that cost 100s of thousands of dollars. I reminded him that his is also a state Senator. The kicker was when I reminded him that probably 1/3 of the country “talks like that” and that if I told him I could never vote for a Black because of how they talk he would brand me a bigot and a racist. I’m sure he will vote for Pritzker anyway but at least he shut up.
  10. I’ll just leave this right here: 3. Baiting/Flaming/Trolling - To bait someone in a general sense is to make a comment with a purposeful intent to coerce some form of response from the individual. In some cases this device can be a useful tool of debate, eliciting responses to highlight a point or reveal an underlying truth concerning someone’s argument. However, in other cases the intent of the bait is less focused on debating. “Flamebaiting” is making statements intended to cause an angry or emotional response/flame from the person. Another form of baiting is known as “derailing” or “thread-jacking”. This is deliberate act of making statements with an aim of diverting the topic of a thread significantly from its main focus. These negative forms of baiting constitute a rules violation that can potentially lead to a suspension of posting privileges. "Originally, flame meant to carry forth in a passionate manner in the spirit of honorable debate. Flames most often involved the use of flowery language and flaming well was an art form. More recently flame has come to refer to "any kind of derogatory comment no matter how witless or crude."[google] In a forum with sensitive topics such as this, derogatory flaming is bound to happen. Common sense will prevail, yet this is not an invitation to flame. e.g. "You stupid *****ing moron," is completely unacceptable and could lead to a suspension of posting privileges. Trolling is a diversionary tactic of those who “deliberately exploit tendencies of human nature or of an online community to upset people” or those “who post inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages” to disrupt normal on-topic discussions. [Wikipedia]. Ignorance, bias, and genuine dissent are not trolling, though at times they may appear similar due to the disingenuous nature of some trolls. Trolling is not allowed and can potentially lead to the suspension of posting privileges.
  11. I’m not sure if this was posted before but this place claims to provide the service:
  12. It has been a long time coming! Thank goodness for a SCOTUS that understands the Constitution!
  13. Safe space? Where have I seen that before?
  14. I’ve got a printed copy of this list in sun visor of my car. I’ve had to refer to it a few time.
  15. I was carrying a G26 for a long time and switched to a G43 two years ago. My main concern is having it concealed and the 43 works best for me. I don’t have a problem with the 6+1 and carry a spare 6 rd mag. Whenever I’m at the range maintaining my skills I also practice reloading so I can have 13 rounds available. One odd thing I noticed with my particular G43 is that it shoots 2- 3 inches low with JHP but is pretty much spot on with practice FMJ.
  16. Today’s Chicago Tribune devoted a full page to the “estimated 1000” people to turned out to protest the “scourge of gun (gang) violence with photos. I would personally contact the editor of the Tribune before each IGOLD where we had easily 5-7 times the amount of protesters. I even supplied them and other papers with photos once I did the same the SAFR rallies in downtown Chicago. I know they were aware of it because I spoke with one of the Tribune photographers in attendance who never took his camera out of his bag. We hardly got any mention much less a full page spread. Anti-gun bias in full display. The legacy media is more an arm of the Democrat Party. A sea of gold thanks to Markthesignguy. Nothing newsworthy here 🤬
  17. The rabid anti-gun zealots want to pass laws to make things that are already illegal even more so illegal. Here is a concept for you, if criminals by definition do not follow the existing laws why would a rational person think that the solution is to pass even more laws?
  18. I remember when Sams Club sold soft body armor. I don’t know how popular it was but I remember them having it on display
  19. Here’s an concept for you; criminals by definition do not obey the law. Passing heat another law that criminals will also disobey is an exercise in futility. Pass a useless law, get your photo op and move on but don’t pretend you actually addressed a problem.
×
×
  • Create New...