Jump to content

Snope v Brown fka Bianchi v Frosh - MD AWB

Euler

By Euler
in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

EdDinIL Member

EdDinIL

Posted
Posted
On 8/6/2024 at 5:15 PM, yurimodin said:

Well at least SCOTUS can finally take this one if they want.

 

It is good to know that we basically have to run every parking ticket up to SCOTUS because every power tripping DA and judge can't comprehend the constitution.

I assume the plaintiffs will appeal to SCOTUS immediately.  Does that start a clock on SCOTUS to take it?

ragsbo Member

ragsbo

Posted
Posted
On 8/7/2024 at 11:03 AM, Upholder said:

SCOTUS has no obligation to take any case nor any defined timeline to do decide if they will take a case or not.

They do have an OBLIGATION to up hold the constitution and throw out any laws that violate it; but will they fulfill this obligation and do so in a hastily manner, that is the question. Very doubtful

davel501 Member

davel501

Posted
Posted
On 8/7/2024 at 4:54 PM, Euler said:

The US Supreme Court gets a thousand or so petitions per year. They can only take 50 or so. Lately it's been pushing 80, though.

 

How great would it be if they handled it on the shadow docket to make the point that this was so wrong and the shadow docket still has a place?

yurimodin Member

yurimodin

Posted
Posted
On 8/7/2024 at 6:59 PM, davel501 said:

 

How great would it be if they handled it on the shadow docket to make the point that this was so wrong and the shadow docket still has a place?

HAHAHAHAHA that would mean they actually care about the rights of us mere peasants.

davel501 Member

davel501

Posted
Posted
On 8/8/2024 at 7:52 AM, yurimodin said:

HAHAHAHAHA that would mean they actually care about the rights of us mere peasants.

Lol... They don't actually have to care about our rights to do that. They could just be angry at the shenanigans. 

Howard Roark Member

Howard Roark

Posted
Posted
On 8/7/2024 at 4:54 PM, Euler said:

The US Supreme Court gets a thousand or so petitions per year. They can only take 50 or so. Lately it's been pushing 80, though.

But, but, but Rep. Jamie Raskin (Communist) recently informed us that SCOTUS isn't working hard enough and needs to be reformed (but just the non-communist justices).

  • 2 weeks later...
Upholder Member

Upholder

Posted
Posted
Quote

FPC has filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court in Snope v. Brown (formerly Bianchi v. Frosh), its lawsuit challenging Maryland's ban on so-called ""assault weapons"," requesting review of the Fourth Circuit's highly flawed en banc decision.

 

  • mauserme changed the title to Snope v Brown fka Bianchi v Frosh - MD AWB
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Vodoun da Vinci Member

Vodoun da Vinci

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/6/2024 at 9:00 PM, Dumak_from_arfcom said:

 

They are going to wait until the other cases catch up.  

 So, it's likely to be years yet before we could potentially see these rulings struck down? I'll be surprised if we don't see at least an attempt at a Federal Ban on "assault weapons" and high cap mags in the next 4 years. 

 

VooDoo

Edited by Vodoun da Vinci
ragsbo Member

ragsbo

Posted
Posted

And the courts still let this crap drag out longer and longer while we sit here having our rights DENIED! So much for "justice". AND IF  ever does get over turned, they will have another one ready to vote on and get lard butt to sign and here we go again- because they will NOT have been held accountable for their illegal and unconstitutional acts. This whole mess should have been STAID the moment it hit the courts and kept that way until it was settled, that way at least the state would want to hurry up. 

 

Yes I am p*****, and I am feeling like NO ONE gives a rats patute about it. AND looking at what is going one, I am right!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
lilguy Member

lilguy

Posted
Posted

Like the FOID card, the AWB is here to stay. No last highest court is going to order states with bans to open the floodgates to all the listed weapons. Not gonna happen.

Besides, what’s to keep governors from issuing emergency orders keeping them in place? 

springfield shooter Member

springfield shooter

Posted
Posted
On 10/22/2024 at 5:12 AM, lilguy said:

Like the FOID card, the AWB is here to stay. No last highest court is going to order states with bans to open the floodgates to all the listed weapons. Not gonna happen.

Besides, what’s to keep governors from issuing emergency orders keeping them in place? 

 

With all due respect, why wouldn't they if that's what the Constitution requires? Take for example the sacred cow known as Roe v. Wade.

 

Regarding governors issuing emergency orders (at least in this state)...The vast majority of counties are refusing to enforce PICA now. They surely wouldn't enforce any "emergency orders" after a favorable ruling by SCOTUS.

ragsbo Member

ragsbo

Posted
Posted
On 10/22/2024 at 4:12 AM, lilguy said:

Like the FOID card, the AWB is here to stay. No last highest court is going to order states with bans to open the floodgates to all the listed weapons. Not gonna happen.

Besides, what’s to keep governors from issuing emergency orders keeping them in place? 

I don't agree. I think IF the supreme court gets the right case and follows the constitution that it will be thrown out. NOW you are correct that the powers that wanna be will do EVERYTHING they can to keep it or reinstate it. This will continue until those violating the constitution are held accountable PERSONALLY and I mean jail time! I don't see the court doing that so their crap will continue.

davel501 Member

davel501

Posted
Posted
On 10/22/2024 at 4:12 AM, lilguy said:

Like the FOID card, the AWB is here to stay. No last highest court is going to order states with bans to open the floodgates to all the listed weapons. Not gonna happen.

Besides, what’s to keep governors from issuing emergency orders keeping them in place? 

Just like we'll never get concealed carry, right? 

EdDinIL Member

EdDinIL

Posted
Posted
On 10/22/2024 at 9:41 AM, davel501 said:

Just like we'll never get concealed carry, right? 

The State of Illinois:  So every other state has to have its AWB lifted first?  Challenge accepted.

  • 4 weeks later...
Euler Member

Euler

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On October 9, the state asked to extend the deadline to file its response.

On October 11, the Court extended the state's deadline from October 23 to November 12.

On November 12, the state met the deadline.
  • 2 weeks later...
Upholder Member

Upholder

Posted
Posted
On 11/25/2024 at 11:55 PM, TomKoz said:

So what does this mean?    Simpliy!

 

If you start at the link, it's a thread where Kostas Moros, a lawyer from California with Michel and Associates, who specializes in 2nd amendment cases, analyzes the filing and provides his thoughts on it.

 

His summary at the end is:

Quote

Great reply by @ppatterson85 and co. I'm hoping for a cert grant, and will be very bummed if the Supreme Court cowers from its duty.

If granted, CRPA (and I'm sure tons of others) will do amicus briefs in support.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...