Snope v Brown fka Bianchi v Frosh - MD AWB

[EdDinIL]

On 8/6/2024 at 5:15 PM, yurimodin said:

Well at least SCOTUS can finally take this one if they want.

 

It is good to know that we basically have to run every parking ticket up to SCOTUS because every power tripping DA and judge can't comprehend the constitution.

I assume the plaintiffs will appeal to SCOTUS immediately.  Does that start a clock on SCOTUS to take it?

[Upholder]

SCOTUS has no obligation to take any case nor any defined timeline to do decide if they will take a case or not.

[yurimodin]

On 8/7/2024 at 11:03 AM, Upholder said:

SCOTUS has no obligation to take any case nor any defined timeline to do decide if they will take a case or not.

 

Texas v PA proves this all too well

[ragsbo]

On 8/7/2024 at 11:03 AM, Upholder said:

SCOTUS has no obligation to take any case nor any defined timeline to do decide if they will take a case or not.

They do have an OBLIGATION to up hold the constitution and throw out any laws that violate it; but will they fulfill this obligation and do so in a hastily manner, that is the question. Very doubtful

[Euler]

The US Supreme Court gets a thousand or so petitions per year. They can only take 50 or so. Lately it's been pushing 80, though.

[davel501]

On 8/7/2024 at 4:54 PM, Euler said:

The US Supreme Court gets a thousand or so petitions per year. They can only take 50 or so. Lately it's been pushing 80, though.

 

How great would it be if they handled it on the shadow docket to make the point that this was so wrong and the shadow docket still has a place?

[yurimodin]

On 8/7/2024 at 6:59 PM, davel501 said:

 

How great would it be if they handled it on the shadow docket to make the point that this was so wrong and the shadow docket still has a place?

HAHAHAHAHA that would mean they actually care about the rights of us mere peasants.

[davel501]

On 8/8/2024 at 7:52 AM, yurimodin said:

HAHAHAHAHA that would mean they actually care about the rights of us mere peasants.

Lol... They don't actually have to care about our rights to do that. They could just be angry at the shenanigans. 

[Howard Roark]

On 8/7/2024 at 4:54 PM, Euler said:

The US Supreme Court gets a thousand or so petitions per year. They can only take 50 or so. Lately it's been pushing 80, though.

But, but, but Rep. Jamie Raskin (Communist) recently informed us that SCOTUS isn't working hard enough and needs to be reformed (but just the non-communist justices).

[Upholder]

Quote

FPC has filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court in Snope v. Brown (formerly Bianchi v. Frosh), its lawsuit challenging Maryland's ban on so-called ""assault weapons"," requesting review of the Fourth Circuit's highly flawed en banc decision.

 

[Euler]

FYI, from reading the petition, the reason the caption is no longer Bianchi is because Bianchi GTFOOM. (docket)

[Euler]

On September 11, MD asked for an extension to file its response to the petition.

On September 12, the court granted an extension until October 23.