biggun 1 Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:41 AM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:41 AM i noticed in a reelection commercial fox stated that SHE TOOK ON THE NRA AND WON.i know this is a standard thing for democratic politicions .can anyone tell me how foxx took on the nra and won? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denny15 Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:03 AM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:03 AM Quick google search provides no info for her taking on the NRA. Sent from my SM-G892U using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:13 AM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:13 AM I'm not sure, but Lightfoot said the same thing 22 Nov 2019 when she endorsed Foxx for SA. On 27 November, she seemed to take credit for Wilson v. Cook County, asserting that it's an NRA-backed case, even though it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggun 1 Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:26 AM Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:26 AM so basically it,s just one more lie from foxx.makes me think if her lips are moving she is lying.funny thing is the cook county liberals will once again buy into her lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fife Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:49 AM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 05:49 AM Maybe NRA needs to come slap them upside the head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt guy Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:47 AM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:47 AM And not one single MSM outlet will actually look into it or even raise the question. Without a true adversarial media asking and exposing we are doomed to have liars and cheats ruling over us no matter how we vote against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted January 16, 2020 at 01:21 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 01:21 PM I seen the same commercial and wondered the same thing. How do you utilize that.... ask her opponents that same same question, when and how did she, Foxx, take on the NRA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted January 16, 2020 at 01:54 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 01:54 PM She's a democrat to begin with so she is full of you know what. Second of all, she is a democrat. She could go as far as using the democrats anti gun victories in VA and say that because they are all dems, they were a winning team. It doesn't necessarily need to mean she won a case locally. No one will second guess her in the local MSM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmagloo Posted January 16, 2020 at 02:43 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 02:43 PM Umm, I don't know what you guys are missing, but EVERY frigging Democrat makes the same claim. Where have you been? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yas Posted January 16, 2020 at 02:56 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 02:56 PM "Fought the NRA and won" seems to be a pretty common standard phrase added to democratic campaigns up here. Its probably a question that needs to be asked at a debate or town hall to those candidates coining the term. Last I checked We weren't added to the terrorist watch list. I'd rather hear a States atty candidate say something like "I took on Gangs or organized crime and won". But we seem to be easy targets for Dems as we tend to obey laws and don't shoot up streets randomly and for no reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggun 1 Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:19 PM Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:19 PM Umm, I don't know what you guys are missing, but EVERY frigging Democrat makes the same claim. Where have you been?yes they do as i eluded in my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bubbacs Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:27 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 04:27 PM Take a moment and think about that.......... “I stood up to/fought the NRA, and won” If all these candidates actually did this, and it’s rabid all across the US.Then the NRA as we know it wouldn’t even be in business!A former shell of themselves and with no pull in Washington, maybe half the members they have ever had! But then after a little research today, I can’t find more than a small handful of fights in which the NRA lost their position. Makes Ya Want To Go Hummmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmagloo Posted January 16, 2020 at 06:28 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 06:28 PM Umm, I don't know what you guys are missing, but EVERY frigging Democrat makes the same claim. Where have you been?yes they do as i eluded in my post. Wasn't responding specifically to you, but the word is, alluded . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggun 1 Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:26 PM Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:26 PM thanks,i admit i am really bad at spelling.never won a spelling b in my life and don,t care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defaultdotxbe Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:35 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:35 PM thanks,i admit i am really bad at spelling.never won a spelling b in my life and don,t care.The spelling of alluded eluded you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmagloo Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:52 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 07:52 PM LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggun 1 Posted January 16, 2020 at 11:00 PM Author Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 11:00 PM YEP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted January 16, 2020 at 11:39 PM Share Posted January 16, 2020 at 11:39 PM With apologies to Charles Dickens, this could be titled "Tale of Two Cities" (or maybe "Tale of Two Kims"). We can't say anything bad about them because they are both female.We can't say anything bad about them because they are both "African-American".We can't say anything bad about them because they are both Democrats.We can't say anything bad about them because they are both prosecutors.Maybe their problems stem from the fact they are both named "Kim" !And their last names are only one letter apart - Kim Foxx in Chicago and Kim Gardiner in St. Louis.Both are alleged to showing "favoritism". Both are accused of failing to do their jobs and prosecute arrestees. Both have trouble working with their police departments. I could go on but you get the gist of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanook Posted January 21, 2020 at 02:42 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 02:42 PM She claims to have grown up in Cabrini-Green. I don't know the truth of that, but if there was one single NRA member in that complex, I'd be stunned. NRA had NOTHING to do with the violence in CG and other housing projects. She needs to be voted out of office, but from the sound of it the guy running against her may be worse. He's talking about releasing 'non-violent' criminals so they 'have a second chance'. How about their victims? Don't they deserve a second chance as well? Why even have laws in the first place? "Proud progressive" indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicagoresident Posted January 21, 2020 at 03:16 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 03:16 PM She needs to be voted out of office, but from the sound of it the guy running against her may be worse. He's talking about releasing 'non-violent' criminals so they 'have a second chance'. How about their victims? Don't they deserve a second chance as well? Why even have laws in the first place? "Proud progressive" indeed. The guy running against her is an ex Navy signals intelligence spook whos vowed to use all his prior skills to track gun owners down via paper trails and financial records. Think this is tinfoil? Its right there in his campaign promise. https://newdayconway.com/ Hes also a multi millionaires son that has nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking your guns, its a single issue platform for him. Like a mini Bloomberg. Id rather take an incompetent SA and keep myself safe than a shrewd prosecutorial SA that sees busting every gun offender as his legacy.New Tactics to Stop Illegal GunsFor years the approach in Afghanistan had been to target Taliban fighters, who would then be replaced by more militants with more weapons. Bills mission with Naval Intelligence was to employ new and innovative tactics to go after the drug money that financed the Talibans gun trafficking. He learned that if you follow the money, you can root out the cause of the problem. Here at home, the old way of keeping illegal guns off our streets isnt working. The police are getting the illegal guns, only to have perpetrators of gun violence back on the street with new and more deadly weapons. Bill wants to take the lessons he learned in the Navy to bring new, smart, and innovative strategies to cut off the funding that puts illegal guns on our streets. Working in our communities and with our neighboring counties and states, we can make us all safer by going after the gangs that profit by flooding our streets with illegal guns. And if you commit a crime with a gun while Conways in office, youre going to jail.Hes going after us, because rarely do illegal guns have extensive paper trails or electronic/bank transactions you can cut off. Ripped right from Bloombergs Everytown platform https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/24/mike-bloombergs-presidential-platform-and-industries-it-will-affect.html Everytown is also in favor of a bill introduced by Rep. Jennifer Wexton, D-Va., that would require banks to report suspicious or illegal financial activity relating to guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted January 21, 2020 at 04:54 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 04:54 PM Hes also a multi millionaires son that has nothing to lose and everything to gain by taking your guns, its a single issue platform for him. Like a mini Bloomberg. For the record, Conway Sr. is worth around $3.5B, not mere multimillions. He donated multimillions to his son's campaign. What happened to Donna More? Is she still running? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt guy Posted January 21, 2020 at 04:59 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 04:59 PM ^^^^ how you got that out of that campaign literature is a huge stretch of the imagination Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicagoresident Posted January 21, 2020 at 05:26 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 05:26 PM ^^^^ how you got that out of that campaign literature is a huge stretch of the imaginationBill Conway’s self admitted time spent with the Navy was working with (assuming) OFAC and FinCEN to track money going to the Taliban. He vows to use those skills/connections on gun transactions. After the appeal of Obama’s operation choke point https://townhall.com/columnists/andrewlanger/2018/09/15/the-ghosts-of-obamas-operation-choke-point-n2519008 the civilian disarmament complex has been looking to again put pressure back on banking/electronic transactions used in gun sales. Here’s Sean Casten talking about the same thing, using FinCEN regulations to put pressure on gun transactions. https://casten.house.gov/media/in-the-news/legislation-introduced-fight-gun-violence-examining-financial-information They’re talking points and press releases are all the same because they’re all from the same source playing the same strategy. All referenced back to D Jennifer Wexton out of Virginia, another one of Bloomberg/Everytown candidates he bought that election cycle. Think about this, who buys guns in untraceable cash many transactions away from a bank and who buys guns with money in the bank, on credit/debit cards, electronic payment, etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defaultdotxbe Posted January 21, 2020 at 05:32 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 05:32 PM I'm pretty sure the "drug money that financed the Talibans gun trafficking." wasn't a convenient credit card statement either, seems like he's specifically talking about following the cash that the gangs use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt guy Posted January 21, 2020 at 06:00 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 06:00 PM Working in our communities and with our neighboring counties and states, we can make us all safer by going after the gangs that profit by flooding our streets with illegal guns. And if you commit a crime with a gun while Conways in office, youre going to jail ^^^^^^ This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicagoresident Posted January 21, 2020 at 08:05 PM Share Posted January 21, 2020 at 08:05 PM I'm pretty sure the "drug money that financed the Talibans gun trafficking." wasn't a convenient credit card statement either, seems like he's specifically talking about following the cash that the gangs useSome of it was pretty easy to chase as it came from legitimate Saudi Banks and, although never proven, from Bill Conways father via the Carlyle group. Odd choice of profession in the armed services for his son considering how politically connected his father is. Sources (BTW Osama Bin Ladens brother was in meetings with the Carlyle group the morning of Sep 11. The Bin Ladens had millions invested before being cashed out due to the obvious conflict of interest)https://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/26/business/bin-laden-family-liquidates-holdings-with-carlyle-group.html https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/31/september11.usa4 Clinton state department having difficulty in curtailing Saudi terror financing via Saudi financial institutions https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/05/wikileaks-cables-saudi-terrorist-funding Also speaking of William Conway and the Carlyle group his partner is a host at Bloomberg TV https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/2016-10-17/the-carlyle-groups-david-rubenstein-to-host-bloomberg-tv-series-cg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.