Jump to content

Culp vs Madigan - Lawsuit Filed On Behalf of Non-Residents


Molly B.

Recommended Posts

Posted
A big thanks to all the plaintiffs in giving their time to pursue such an endeavor. A lawsuit is no small task. Thanks all.
Posted

You make me feel...you make me feel...you make me feel like a natural person! (Sorry, this is where a musician's mind can go when reading "a natural person" several times!)

I find this an outstanding suit and hope it it resolved in the favor of the plaintiffs.

Posted

Anyone else having trouble with the PDF? Seems corrupted or something.

Nope - opened up for me...

 

Thanks Molly - Fix bayonets!!

Posted

 

Thanks Molly, for all you do.

 

 

 

You are quite welcome! We must keep moving forward and winning new ground!

 

Yep--I have no idea where you find the energy to keep up this demanding pace. THANK YOU!

Posted

Had to switch to IE11 after downloading it 3 times in my usual browser (Chrome). Each time the file was a different size.

Posted

Had to switch to IE11 after downloading it 3 times in my usual browser (Chrome). Each time the file was a different size.

Dang FF - ditch the Chrome. Maybe we need to get you a Mac!! Christmas is coming...

Posted

You make me feel...you make me feel...you make me feel like a natural person! (Sorry, this is where a musician's mind can go when reading "a natural person" several times!)

I find this an outstanding suit and hope it it resolved in the favor of the plaintiffs.

I will not be until the RIDICULOUS $300.00 price tag is reduced . That in itself is well placed road block and burden in bold flashing neon lights saying we do not want anyone concealed carrying especially Non Residents

But it is a start and a good one

Thanks MollyB and Federal Farmer Good Job

Posted

I will not be until the RIDICULOUS $300.00 price tag is reduced . That in itself is well placed road block and burden in bold flashing neon lights saying we do not want anyone concealed carrying especially Non Residents

But it is a start and a good one

Thanks MollyB and Federal Farmer Good Job

I was a bit disappointed that the suit didn't include the cost discrimination issue.

 

Also a bit curious about the emphasis on the non-residents all having carry permits from their states of residence. I don't see how it's relevant to Illinois issuing an Illinois license for carry in Illinois.

Posted

The price difference, imo, is very difficult to argue considering almost every state with a nonresident permit or license charges more. For example, Virginia also charges nonresidents double what they charge residents. Imo, that's not a winnable argument.

 

Thank you to everybody involved for this. I know I've been a major pain in the arse over this (and that's likely why I wasn't named in the suit). I'm sorry.

 

Posted

 

You make me feel...you make me feel...you make me feel like a natural person! (Sorry, this is where a musician's mind can go when reading "a natural person" several times!)

I find this an outstanding suit and hope it it resolved in the favor of the plaintiffs.

I will not be until the RIDICULOUS $300.00 price tag is reduced . That in itself is well placed road block and burden in bold flashing neon lights saying we do not want anyone concealed carrying especially Non Residents

But it is a start and a good one

Thanks MollyB and Federal Farmer Good Job

 

 

One thing at a time. Learn from the Kwong v. Bloomberg case. The 2nd Circuit ruled that $455 for a 3 year home possession permit was perfectly constitutional, because the plaintiffs supposedly did not prove how it effected them.

You best plaintiff is someone on a fixed income on SSDI with a physically disability where $300 would basically cost them medicine for a month....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...