Vodoun da Vinci Posted December 12, 2023 at 09:21 PM Share Posted December 12, 2023 at 09:21 PM Seems to be that if they are Politicians they are all getting paid. VooDoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted March 14, 2024 at 04:34 AM Share Posted March 14, 2024 at 04:34 AM CNN said:→Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, will go on trial for gun-related charges on June 3, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. ... In Delaware, Hunter Biden has been charged with unlawfully purchasing a revolver while using illicit drugs, allegedly lying on federal forms about his drug use when he bought the weapon. Hunter Biden has been charged with unlawfully purchasing a revolver while using illicit drugs, allegedly lying on federal forms about his drug use when he bought the weapon. Prosecutors believe their case will last three to four days and Hunter Biden's attorneys expect their case to potentially go over two days. ... During a status conference Wednesday, Judge Maryellen Noreika told the parties she was "working through the motions" filed by Hunter Biden. "We're trying to get something out as soon as we can," the judge said. "I haven't completely figured out what I'm going to do with all of them." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted March 14, 2024 at 12:46 PM Share Posted March 14, 2024 at 12:46 PM Scotus nixed the 5th on Daniels late last year right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted March 14, 2024 at 09:07 PM Share Posted March 14, 2024 at 09:07 PM If you mean US v Daniels, the cert petition is on hold. It hasn't been denied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted March 16, 2024 at 10:13 PM Share Posted March 16, 2024 at 10:13 PM Euler, I fully expect the 6/3 start date for Hunter's trial to be pushed back so that it doesn't "interfere" with the November election. After all, they don't want to cause any embarrassment for "the Big guy". 🤮 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted April 13, 2024 at 10:48 PM Share Posted April 13, 2024 at 10:48 PM CNN said:→A federal judge has rejected several attempts by Hunter Biden to throw out his felony gun indictment in Delaware. The trial -- the first-ever against the child of a sitting US president -- is scheduled to begin in early June, as his father, President Joe Biden, campaigns for reelection. Federal Judge Maryellen Noreika issued the rulings Friday in the closely watched case. Hunter Biden has pleaded not guilty to charges of lying on federal firearm forms and owning a gun while using illicit drugs. On claims from Hunter Biden's attorneys that he was being selectively prosecuted because he is the son of President Joe Biden, the judge noted that the attorney general who appointed special counsel David Weiss -- who is overseeing the two cases against Hunter Biden -- was appointed by his father, who is in charge of the executive branch of the government. "The Executive Branch that charged Defendant is headed by that sitting President -- Defendant's father. The Attorney General heading the DOJ was appointed by and reports to Defendant's father. And that Attorney General appointed the Special Counsel who made the challenged charging decision in this case -- while Defendant's father was still the sitting President," the judge wrote. "Defendant's claim is effectively that his own father targeted him for being his son, a claim that is nonsensical under the facts here," she added. The judge also ruled that Hunter Biden's defunct 2023 deal with Weiss didn't give him immunity from the current prosecution and rejected his argument that the charges were politically motivated. The judge concluded that Hunter Biden "has failed to offer clear evidence" that Weiss abandoned last year's proposed deal to resolve the matter, and instead pursued an indictment, because of Hunter or Joe Biden's "political affiliations." In fact, "there appear to be legitimate considerations that support the decision to prosecute," she wrote. The docket doesn't show a ruling yet on a key motion from Hunter Biden challenging the constitutionality of the gun laws used to charge him. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted April 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM Share Posted April 16, 2024 at 08:23 PM Who's got the popcorn?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundguy Posted April 16, 2024 at 08:42 PM Share Posted April 16, 2024 at 08:42 PM On 4/13/2024 at 5:48 PM, Euler said: In fact, "there appear to be legitimate considerations that support the decision to prosecute," she wrote. The docket doesn't show a ruling yet on a key motion from Hunter Biden challenging the constitutionality of the gun laws used to charge him. If he was just some random guy, we'd be hoping all charges were dropped. Go Hunter? Cheers, Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted April 16, 2024 at 09:21 PM Share Posted April 16, 2024 at 09:21 PM On 4/16/2024 at 3:42 PM, soundguy said: If he was just some random guy, we'd be hoping all charges were dropped. Nope... Although I may not agree with the 4473 questions and current policy, I would also not be hoping charges were dropped against anyone and I mean anyone who chose to deliberately and intentionally lie on a 4473 to illegally obtain a firearm... I simply do not support perjury... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted April 16, 2024 at 10:43 PM Share Posted April 16, 2024 at 10:43 PM (edited) On April 16, 2024 at 03:42 PM CDT, soundguy said:→If he was just some random guy, we'd be hoping all charges were dropped. ... If he were just some random guy, we'd be hoping that a fair application of the law might let him go, since the law is unjust. But since he's a member of the ruling elites, we're hoping for a fair application of the law, which would be to do to him what the law usually does to random guys. Frequently the only way to get a bad law changed is to get the ruling class to realize that it can be used against them the same way they use it against everyone else. Unfortunately that doesn't happen very often. Edited April 16, 2024 at 10:52 PM by Euler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fxdpntc Posted April 16, 2024 at 10:54 PM Share Posted April 16, 2024 at 10:54 PM No man is above the law? 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobPistol Posted April 17, 2024 at 02:45 AM Share Posted April 17, 2024 at 02:45 AM He'll get $50 fine and time served, from Judge Harry Stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRussell Posted April 17, 2024 at 12:47 PM Share Posted April 17, 2024 at 12:47 PM On 4/16/2024 at 9:45 PM, BobPistol said: He'll get $50 fine and time served, from Judge Harry Stone And someone else will pay the $50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurimodin Posted April 22, 2024 at 02:27 PM Share Posted April 22, 2024 at 02:27 PM On 4/16/2024 at 4:21 PM, Flynn said: Nope... Although I may not agree with the 4473 questions and current policy, I would also not be hoping charges were dropped against anyone and I mean anyone who chose to deliberately and intentionally lie on a 4473 to illegally obtain a firearm... I simply do not support perjury... 4473 in unconstitutional bunk anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davel501 Posted April 22, 2024 at 03:35 PM Share Posted April 22, 2024 at 03:35 PM On 4/22/2024 at 9:27 AM, yurimodin said: 4473 in unconstitutional bunk anyway I have to admit that it's kind of nice to be in a win-win position when it comes to firearms and the legal system. I'm still pretty sure they'll find a way to cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurimodin Posted April 22, 2024 at 05:36 PM Share Posted April 22, 2024 at 05:36 PM On 4/22/2024 at 10:35 AM, davel501 said: I have to admit that it's kind of nice to be in a win-win position when it comes to firearms and the legal system. I'm still pretty sure they'll find a way to cheat. I will LMAO if Hunter is the guy that finally gets this stupid question off of the 4473 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now