Upholder Posted August 14, 2023 at 08:00 PM Posted August 14, 2023 at 08:00 PM The case was filed in the Federal District Court of Southern Illinois on August 14, 2023. (docket) NSSF is the National Shooting Sports Foundation, representing the various manufacturers.
Upholder Posted August 14, 2023 at 08:10 PM Author Posted August 14, 2023 at 08:10 PM The complaint: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723.1.0.pdf Quote Although the statute purports to be aimed at preventing firearms from being used in such a way that endangers public safety or health, HB 218 does not regulate the use (or misuse) of firearms. Nor does it impose liability on individuals who misuse firearms to the detriment of themselves or others. Instead, HB 218 regulates selling, manufacturing, and advertising lawful (and constitutionally protected) firearms and related products. In other words, HB 218 regulates commerce in and speech relating to arms—even when that commerce and speech takes place entirely outside of Illinois, as will often be the case. HB 218 also removes traditional elements of tort law that ensure that judges and juries do not impose liability on private parties for constitutionally protected conduct. Making matters worse, the statute jettisons traditional proximate cause in favor of allowing state courts to impose liability on licensed industry members for the actions of third-party criminals with whom the industry members never dealt.
Upholder Posted August 15, 2023 at 07:12 PM Author Posted August 15, 2023 at 07:12 PM Tuesday, United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty was randomly assigned to the case in the Southern Illinois federal court district. Beatty was appointed to the position in 2019 during the presidency of Donald Trump.
steveTA84 Posted August 16, 2023 at 10:27 PM Posted August 16, 2023 at 10:27 PM (edited) Reassigned to McGlynn LOFL!!!!!! Oh boy fat man ain’t gonna be happy https://x.com/bishoponair/status/1691922302349246573?s=46&t=ZJIYNr-TwO9eZdQE_UykAg Edited August 16, 2023 at 10:28 PM by steveTA84
Euler Posted August 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM Posted August 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM Most district cases are assigned to magistrates. They get assigned to judges when at least one party (or the judge) wants a judge instead of a magistrate. That part is no big deal. That the judge is McGlynn is more interesting.
Tvandermyde Posted August 16, 2023 at 11:32 PM Posted August 16, 2023 at 11:32 PM Euler -- can you post the pacer link to the case so we can track the docket? please. . .
Euler Posted August 17, 2023 at 12:13 AM Posted August 17, 2023 at 12:13 AM Upholder posted the CourtListener link above. On August 14, 2023 at 03:00 PM, Upholder said:→The case was filed in the Federal District Court of Southern Illinois on August 14, 2023. (docket) ... But if you really do mean the PACER link, that's here (requires login).
yurimodin Posted August 17, 2023 at 04:13 PM Posted August 17, 2023 at 04:13 PM Don't worry Eastercrook will inject himself into this case so he can blatantly break his oath again.
Tvandermyde Posted August 18, 2023 at 02:00 AM Posted August 18, 2023 at 02:00 AM I love the Eastercrook reference but withhold that until he rules against us in the current case, he has a chance to redeem and check his ego
JTHunter Posted August 19, 2023 at 03:14 AM Posted August 19, 2023 at 03:14 AM On 8/17/2023 at 9:00 PM, Tvandermyde said: I love the Eastercrook reference but withhold that until he rules against us in the current case, he has a chance to redeem and check his ego With the amount of arrogance and pompousness he shows, do you realistically think that is possible? 🙄
davel501 Posted August 19, 2023 at 05:25 AM Posted August 19, 2023 at 05:25 AM On 8/18/2023 at 10:14 PM, JTHunter said: With the amount of arrogance and pompousness he shows, do you realistically think that is possible? 🙄 I've actually seen guys like that do a similar thing. The logic is that if someone is going to undo their work it's going to be them.
Upholder Posted August 19, 2023 at 02:26 PM Author Posted August 19, 2023 at 02:26 PM (edited) Quote NSSF v. Raoul (S.D. IL): Illinois is mad that the NSSF's lawsuit against the state's gun industry liability bill was assigned to the same judge that issued a preliminary injunction against its "assault weapon" and magazine bans, and has asked for a reassignment. Here is the filing: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723.13.0.pdf Edited August 19, 2023 at 02:27 PM by Upholder
crufflesmuth Posted August 19, 2023 at 05:01 PM Posted August 19, 2023 at 05:01 PM On 8/18/2023 at 10:14 PM, JTHunter said: With the amount of arrogance and pompousness he shows, do you realistically think that is possible? 🙄 They're judges. They can be arrogant, but they have to work within a framework. They can't ignore Bruen.
Tip Posted August 19, 2023 at 08:37 PM Posted August 19, 2023 at 08:37 PM On 8/19/2023 at 12:01 PM, crufflesmuth said: They can't ignore Bruen. Of late quite a few of them seem to be doing a pretty good job of it…..
ragsbo Posted August 19, 2023 at 11:13 PM Posted August 19, 2023 at 11:13 PM On 8/19/2023 at 3:37 PM, Tip said: Of late quite a few of them seem to be doing a pretty good job of it….. On 8/19/2023 at 3:37 PM, Tip said: Of late quite a few of them seem to be doing a pretty good job of it….. Because they are not being held accountable for doing so
crufflesmuth Posted August 20, 2023 at 12:21 AM Posted August 20, 2023 at 12:21 AM In an ideal world, presuming I could read Easterbrook correctly: AR-15's are legal to own in Chicago and Cook County. Standard magazines even. No restrictions. Maybe an SBR. Maybe a suppressor. But no machine-guns. What judges like Easterbrook are realizing is that Bruen could be brought up against FOPA and challenge the registry ban. Perhaps even more. The progressives really are short-sighted. Most people are happy with just semi-auto rifles and machine-guns banned. That's been status quo for sometime.
JTHunter Posted August 20, 2023 at 01:45 AM Posted August 20, 2023 at 01:45 AM (edited) On 8/19/2023 at 12:25 AM, davel501 said: I've actually seen guys like that do a similar thing. The logic is that if someone is going to undo their work it's going to be them. Really? Edited August 20, 2023 at 01:46 AM by JTHunter
JTHunter Posted August 20, 2023 at 01:47 AM Posted August 20, 2023 at 01:47 AM On 8/19/2023 at 3:37 PM, Tip said: Of late quite a few of them seem to be doing a pretty good job of it….. Agreed !!
davel501 Posted August 20, 2023 at 02:22 AM Posted August 20, 2023 at 02:22 AM On 8/19/2023 at 8:45 PM, JTHunter said: Really? People that want to be right more than anything. He's late in career so legacy matters here too.
Upholder Posted August 23, 2023 at 03:54 PM Author Posted August 23, 2023 at 03:54 PM Motion to reconsider the assignment of judge was granted: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723/gov.uscourts.ilsd.97723.18.0.pdf Reassigned back to Judge Mark Beatty.
Molly B. Posted August 23, 2023 at 11:28 PM Posted August 23, 2023 at 11:28 PM https://youtu.be/HffPh8_sIKU?si=wp_pSkcZm2ctY3bG
Euler Posted September 1, 2023 at 03:44 AM Posted September 1, 2023 at 03:44 AM (edited) On August 30, the case was assigned to Judge Staci Yandle. She is also the judge in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion > Meyer v Raoul - Carry ban under-21. Edited September 1, 2023 at 03:48 AM by Euler
steveTA84 Posted September 4, 2023 at 12:50 PM Posted September 4, 2023 at 12:50 PM She’s an Obama judge that sides with the government in gun cases. Don’t expect much https://madisonrecord.com/stories/635323245-u-s-court-of-appeals-affirms-summary-judgment-in-bump-stock-class-action
Euler Posted September 19, 2023 at 02:07 AM Posted September 19, 2023 at 02:07 AM On September 15, NSSF filed a motion for a preliminary injunction.
Upholder Posted September 21, 2023 at 01:50 PM Author Posted September 21, 2023 at 01:50 PM On September 20, Defendant's motion for an extension (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed no later than October 19, 2023.
Euler Posted June 8, 2024 at 12:19 AM Posted June 8, 2024 at 12:19 AM On June 7, the judge ordered the parties into mediation. I've heard this song before in other cases. It isn't going to happen. One side wants the law enjoined. The other side wants to enforce it. There is no middle ground.
Euler Posted June 29, 2024 at 02:38 AM Posted June 29, 2024 at 02:38 AM (edited) On June 24, Raoul asked to file the Rahimi decision as an authority in support of the defendants in this case. On June 25, the judge granted permission, subject to her review of its applicability. Edited June 29, 2024 at 02:41 AM by Euler
Euler Posted July 9, 2024 at 02:27 AM Posted July 9, 2024 at 02:27 AM On July 8, based on a joint status report (which is not on the docket) all pending deadlines are stayed until the judge rules on outstanding motions, including a motion for a preliminary injunction.
yurimodin Posted July 9, 2024 at 05:21 PM Posted July 9, 2024 at 05:21 PM On 7/8/2024 at 9:27 PM, Euler said: On July 8, based on a joint status report (which is not on the docket) all pending deadlines are stayed until the judge rules on outstanding motions, including a motion for a preliminary injunction. in English please?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now