Thomas Paine Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:01 PM Share Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:01 PM From schools to theaters to waffle houses, the lunacy has to stop. Every journey starts with a first step. Why not give this one a chance to go viral on the whitehouse.gov website? https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/repeal-or-amend-gun-free-school-zones-act-light-otis-mcdonald-decision-cost-benefit-analysis It can't go viral until it reaches the 150 signatures needed for it to be seen by the general public. If you're reading this and not doing what you can to push the solution, you're part of the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mic6010 Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:13 PM Share Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:13 PM You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ? They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always. It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America. And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it. Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Paine Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:46 PM Author Share Posted June 23, 2018 at 11:46 PM If Obama invented the hammer, would you refuse to use it? Trump will sign legislation like this if we put the pressure on Congress to pass it. But, we'll never know what will happen until it breaks through the 150 barrier with legitimate email addresses so the votes can be confirmed. It's a miracle that we haven't yet had a terrorist attack on a school here. They can see the red carpet. I signed the petition because I don't want blood on may hands the next time a kid is killed in a school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamma Posted June 24, 2018 at 12:08 AM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 12:08 AM "Gun Free Zone" = designated victims zone. Good luck getting Congress to figure that out. They can't even allow carry in wilderness areas where hunting is allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Paine Posted June 24, 2018 at 04:05 AM Author Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 04:05 AM They don't have to figure anything out. A common sense solution will be staring them in the face if we make them look at it. If you have a better idea, let's have it. Otherwise, don't throw a monkey wrench into this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallbore Posted June 24, 2018 at 01:09 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 01:09 PM I signed it. We have few vocal anti2nd negative people on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLOCK22 Posted June 24, 2018 at 01:27 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 01:27 PM Signed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted June 24, 2018 at 03:06 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 03:06 PM · Hidden by Molly B., December 12, 2018 at 04:25 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., December 12, 2018 at 04:25 PM - No reason given You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ? They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always. It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America. And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it. Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill.This. Ignore these White House petitions. They where only for the Obama administration. Trump’s team isn’t doing anything with them Link to comment
TomKoz Posted June 24, 2018 at 03:45 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 03:45 PM Signed and posted on the Facebook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plinkermostly Posted June 24, 2018 at 08:26 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 08:26 PM I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ. signed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicagoresident Posted June 24, 2018 at 11:26 PM Share Posted June 24, 2018 at 11:26 PM They don't have to figure anything out. A common sense solution will be staring them in the face if we make them look at it. If you have a better idea, let's have it. Otherwise, don't throw a monkey wrench into this one.[/size] I would be happy if some victims won a few lawsuits against Pulse, MGM, and Marjorie Stoneman. The aurora theater lawsuit was a travesty http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-batman-shooting-lawsuit-20160822-snap-story.html It's rediculous the leftist logic that believes its bad legal precedence to sue a facility that provides inadequate securityhttp://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/audience/george-diaz/os-pulse-lawsuit-shooting-victims-20180611-story.html But suing gun manufacturers for misuse is good legal precedence https://www.revealnews.org/article/3-lawsuits-attempt-to-hold-gun-makers-sellers-liable-for-shootings/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted June 25, 2018 at 03:04 PM Share Posted June 25, 2018 at 03:04 PM I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ. signedIt's all based on the nonsensical reasoning that mass shootings are spur-of-the-moment decisions (rather than planned) or tragic accidents. Not that any ever were, but that's the only logical conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted June 25, 2018 at 06:36 PM Share Posted June 25, 2018 at 06:36 PM But suing gun manufacturers for misuse is good legal precedencehttps://www.revealnews.org/article/3-lawsuits-attempt-to-hold-gun-makers-sellers-liable-for-shootings/ To be fair, two of the 3 suits referenced are suing stores, alleging illegal sale of a firearm, then used in murder. Those, are not too dangerous. They actually, IF proven are allowed by law. The other against Bushmaster is very dangerous, since it hasn't been struck down as against The Lawful Commerce in Arms Act already. AMong other things it is trying to make it a public record that AR-15s are "military weapon, “engineered to deliver maximum carnage with extreme efficiency,” and that its design features “exceptional muzzle velocity, the ability to accommodate large-capacity magazines, and effective rapid fire.”" and that "gun maker and seller should have known that people unfit to operate the weapons would gain access to them. In particular, the families say, Bushmaster should have known of the “unreasonably high risk” that the rifle would be used in a mass shooting.". I have no idea how it isn't being struck down because of the afore mentioned law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted June 25, 2018 at 09:21 PM Share Posted June 25, 2018 at 09:21 PM I will NEVER understand the logic of a GFZ. signed That's because there IS no logic in the basic premise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plinkermostly Posted June 26, 2018 at 06:28 PM Share Posted June 26, 2018 at 06:28 PM Try to tell that to 'them,' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.