Jump to content

cybermgk

Members
  • Posts

    445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by cybermgk

  1. But that is the point. Under our Constitution, we have the freedom to, or not to buy products made wherever. THAT is exactly the point. I personally CHOOSE to not buy products made in China, and certainly by Chinese (CCP) owned companies. It is sometimes impossible, but I do what I can. THAT is my choice.. Your whole stance seems to be that Biden making royal Fiats, is ok, because the country involved is bad.
  2. Yes. And although, technically this hurts Russia, it is really a minor degree. But, it was done, under that auspice. But, any objective person can see it was aimed at hurting gun owning Americans. Does anyone REALLY believe this was done to hurt Russia as stated? Particularly, after this Administration, for all intent and purpose greenlighted their oil pipeline?
  3. According to Larry Keane of the NSSF, this likely won't impact us, for 2 years, because it only affects NEW applications from Sep 7 on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTeae6A8PL8
  4. Well, hopefully, he will shortly have a whole lot less funds paying him to destroy our rights.
  5. If they had the votes it would have been called to vote weeks ago. Even Durbin, says his nomination is problematic.
  6. Colorado was the first exodus end point for ex Californians. Kind of expected this eventually. One big pop area, flood of idiots from California, only a matter of time.
  7. The Principle of Psychological Acceptability: When it's easier to circumvent a security control than to comply with it, people will circumvent it. It applies to any security control. There was an aerial photograph I saw once of one faculty parking lot at (I think) University of Michigan (might have been Michigan State). The lot used to be open. The University changed that by putting a gate with a crossing arm at the entrance and exit. Faculty needed to swipe a card to get in and out through the gate. However, there was no curb. The aerial photo showed tire tracks driving through the grass around the gate. Yes it has been turned into a pro 2A meme I believe
  8. "(430 ILCS 65/3) (from Ch. 38, par. 83-3) Private transfer of firearms: a. Any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer and who desires to transfer or sell a firearm or firearms to any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer shall, before selling or transferring the firearms, contact a federal firearm license dealer under paragraph (1) of subsection (a-15) of this Section to conduct the transfer or the Illinois State Police with the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card number to determine the validity of the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card under State and federal law including the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Effective date January 1, 2024." I still read that as Private Seller CAN have FFL do sale, OR can do the same as now essentially, check with ISP that FOID is good. Or am I wrong, Because, that is NOT what news outlets are reporting, they are reporting "Universal Background checks". Even other Pro-2A activists are believing the same from said outlets. https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/02/politics/illinois-background-checks-gun-sales/index.html
  9. Essentially nothing. Private sellers can, if they want, go to an FFL to check the buyers' FOIDs, or continue to use the web site, same as today. It just sounds good to JB's voters, now that he's announced he's running for re-election. Not entirely true. Buyer in a private sale has 10 days to file the sale with an FFL.
  10. So what is their argument, I wonder. Any argument they use, and get a favorable ruling, can then be used against Immigration Sanctuary Cities. Guess the County Commissioners don't plan on being reelected.
  11. That, right there is enough to invalidate him for the post.
  12. Well, if there was a plan like that, they should have gone neutral on HB1091, instead of HB592. Don't attribute to cleverness what you can to ineptness. or malice
  13. Surprisingly, the anti's haven't been harping that the increase is the cause (not in any great concert). Studies like this getting in front of that, nips it in the bud, if we are lucky.
  14. http://wordpress.bidennoms.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Chipman-Research-Report.pdf https://youtu.be/WBfXwq1LNV0
  15. That, was my first thought. Could also be using lesser quality primers, due to lack there of/scarcity. Might behoove the OP to weigh them, compare them to a known good round. might even pull a bullet from one of the cartridges and check if it actually has real powder
  16. Does anyone know, how inherited 'transfers; are covered by this? Does the person inheriting the gun have to file with an FFL, within 10 days?
  17. So, in the section on what the buyer of a private sale must do, am I wrong, or do I see NOWHERE where it states an Effective date, a demarcation line. Am I just being obtuse, to think, because of that, this could be abused on past sales?
  18. But, I thought anyone with a handgun was massively outgunned, and couldn't stop a person with the all powerful war machine AR-15?
  19. ATF and State preemption dismantling, this is the Antis strategic direction.
  20. I stand corrected, and appologize, I saw the same quoted letter I replied to but didn't see my reply, didn't realize the letter was quoted in both threads. Yes, not everyone checks every thread, wanted everyone to see their 'response'.
  21. What should they have done? Objected to both, strenuously, and immediately prepared suit to challenge the provisions of 1091 and to end the FOID card. As it is they capitulated to the “lesser” 582 and, in doing so, seriously weakened their case towards ending the FOID card. If you don’t believe you have a winnable case get outta the way and let somebody who does believe they do pursue it. As it is you took actions that increased the odds that litigation might be unsuccessful by actively accepting a “less onerous” infringement. SOme of exactly what I replied with.
  22. Got this answer to my email to ISRA on HB562. This is the most verbosity I have seen
  23. Got this answer to my email to ISRA on HB562. This is the most verbosity I have seen
×
×
  • Create New...