Plinkermostly

Shall not infringe -- vbg!!! (very big grin)

so much for infringe

so much for infringe

Ya do kind of get that idea -- they ain't just going to roll over, not a surprise since they never understood: shall not infringe.

How long, O Lord. Shall not be infringed.

OR just tell them: shall not infringe.

'On the road again . . . .'

Just a silly thought: they ban guns, guns are only held by outlaws, outlaws get out jail free, and . . . violence ends. That about it?

IMHO they are well past wrong enough.

AND remember that we pay for BOTH sides of this lawfare! Got to love Illanoy.

From: https://reason.com/volokh/2023/04/27/a-judge-who-understands-firearms/ "Ms. Murphy had a few minutes left for rebuttal, but she summed it up best in one sentence: "The State seems to want to litigate this case as if Bruen never happened." I do believe that pretty much sums it up for -- NY, NJ, CA, OR, WA, . . . and IL!

well said

It's like they totally missed . . . everything (Bruen et al) but it's all they got (which is good) -- "FEELINGS, nothing more than feelings . . . "

More background/update:

remember: don't blame the messenger.