12 replies to this topic

[mikew]

https://apnews.com/d...36ec96dc6156aa2

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday blocked a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, issuing a sharply worded rebuke of “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.

“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,” Benitez wrote in a 120-page opinion granting the group’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July.

 

---more---

[Euler]

The case is Rhode v Becerra.
showtopic=72590

IN ?

Edited by Euler, 24 April 2020 - 12:42 AM.

[springfield shooter]

Judge Roger T. Benitez:

 

https://en.wikipedia...oger_T._Benitez

[DarkLord]

He will change his mind  next week, like he did when he ruled on the magazine ban..

[Raw Power]

Good news.

[Johnnybgood]

"Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July." Meaning the lefties used the dead, the illegals, and the fake votes to get it passed.

[mikew]

Judge Roger T. Benitez:

 

https://en.wikipedia...oger_T._Benitez

Born to escape communism, not promote it.

[steveTA84]

"Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July." Meaning the lefties used the dead, the illegals, and the fake votes to get it passed.

No, meaning that just because it’s popular and supported by a bunch of brain dead sheeple doesn’t make it lawful or right

[once0217]

He just denied the states stay request.

[press1280]

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.

[Talonap]

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.

Have a link to that info? Just so we can read it...

Edited by Talonap, 25 April 2020 - 02:06 PM.

[Talonap]

 

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.

Have a link to that info? Just so we can read it...

 

Never mind, here's one:

 

https://www.nraila.o...mo-restrictions
 

[mab22]

That was out of Comifornia ? HOLY ---- Batman!