A federal judge ruled has ruled that the Trump administration violated federal law when it allowed a Texas company to publish blueprints online for 3D-printed guns.
In his ruling, published Nov. 12, U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik granted a motion for summary judgment, ruling that the administrations decision to allow the unlimited distribution on the internet of data files for untraceable, undetectable 3D-printed guns was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful.
|
|
And now a liberal judge is going after Trump for 3D guns
Started by
steveTA84
, Nov 15 2019 09:37 AM
13 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Supporting Members Team
-
- 6,387 posts Joined: 14-December 15
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:37 AM
https://www.foxnews....WDe0UM5ZaEfiNYw
#2
-
- Supporting Members Team
-
- 4,696 posts Joined: 04-February 10
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 10:01 AM
IMPEACH !!
Stay Alert ... Stay Alive !!
#3
-
- Members
-
- 2,408 posts Joined: 20-August 18
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 11:46 AM
No shame, they are now openly attacking first right to get to attack the second rights...
Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
—Anonymous
#4
-
- Members
-
- 2,219 posts Joined: 26-February 18
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 01:12 PM
The case is about ITAR. The judge is ruling that 3D files for guns are themselves munitions and may not be exported, even though the Dept of Commerce (which governs ITAR) says it's okay.
The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.
- Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion, and Death, 1960.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 437 posts Joined: 12-November 13
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 03:05 PM
Judicial overreach.
"Senator if we figure out a way to make criminals obey the law, then you'll be my first call"
#6
-
- Members
-
- 8,107 posts Joined: 07-July 06
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 05:26 PM
Does anyone have a larger cork? I cant keep the genie in the bottle!
"We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1776
Life Member NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA, GOA, & SAF
#7
-
- Members
-
- 9,234 posts Joined: 24-February 13
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 06:58 PM
LWW's attacking the 2nd amendment by attacking the first amendment.
The Second Amendment of the Constitution protects the rest.
#8
-
- Supporting Members Team
-
- 6,387 posts Joined: 14-December 15
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 07:06 PM
LWW's attacking the 2nd amendment by attacking the first amendment.
I know plenty of liberals who I agree a lot with (and work with on my stuff). We have our differences, but we all agree that government should be limited and our rights are off limits for negotiation. They are also against many in the DNC and feel that they themselves no longer have a party. ANYONE who supports the politicians and judges just because they are Democrat really don’t know a damn thing other than “party first”. Classic liberalism is dead. New liberals are tyrannical commies (and even some dems agree with this).
#9
-
- Members
-
- 6,727 posts Joined: 21-November 13
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 08:04 PM
How on earth is defending the 1st and 2nd Amendments "arbitrary, capricious and unlawful"?
"I'm not worried about following the U.S. Constitution." - Washington County, Alabama Judge Nick Williams
#10
-
- Members
-
- 2,408 posts Joined: 20-August 18
Member
Posted 15 November 2019 - 08:24 PM
How on earth is defending the 1st and 2nd Amendments "arbitrary, capricious and unlawful"?
It goes along with their belief that these guns are "undetectable" words just spew out their mouths like diarrhea with not thought.
Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
—Anonymous
#11
-
- Members
-
- 1,278 posts Joined: 05-February 14
Member
Posted 16 November 2019 - 06:44 AM
So, the judge never said WHY he thinks it's unlawful.
Probably because it isn't and is protected by the 1A.
He needs to get over it.
#12
-
- Members
-
- 9,234 posts Joined: 24-February 13
Member
Posted 16 November 2019 - 11:49 AM
How on earth is defending the 1st and 2nd Amendments "arbitrary, capricious and unlawful"?
Because people use both to oppose LWW's totalitarianism.
The Second Amendment of the Constitution protects the rest.
#13
-
- Members
-
- 437 posts Joined: 12-November 13
Member
Posted 18 November 2019 - 11:19 AM
How on earth is defending the 1st and 2nd Amendments "arbitrary, capricious and unlawful"?
Projection. That's what's going to be said when his ruling is overturned.
"Senator if we figure out a way to make criminals obey the law, then you'll be my first call"
#14
-
- Members
-
- 1,067 posts Joined: 07-March 10
Member
Posted 24 November 2019 - 02:42 PM
IMPEACH !!
Constitutional Carry - Proponent
Open Carry - Proponent
Exercise your rights - Engage in civil disobedience against unconstitutional laws - IGNORE THE F.O.I.D.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
