Steve51 Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:54 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:54 AM Only a complete moron would deny that this does not have an appearance of conflict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:58 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 01:58 AM On 3/16/2023 at 8:54 PM, Steve51 said: Only a complete moron would deny that this does not have an appearance of conflict. Like this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve51 Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:03 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:03 AM Yes! Illinois' top and biggest moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:48 AM Share Posted March 17, 2023 at 02:48 AM On 3/16/2023 at 9:03 PM, Steve51 said: Yes! Illinois' top and biggest moron. IL-ANNOY's version of POTUS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesW Posted March 31, 2023 at 06:46 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 06:46 PM (edited) Asking for recusal: https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_9e17d63a-cff2-11ed-a7bc-7b96223555b7.html?fbclid=IwAR2Ow1W42IrY61Z-Rdia84pWX1KKLZZV7Vu_V5cSo_xex1YJValadVHcx1w Edited March 31, 2023 at 06:47 PM by JamesW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 07:17 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 07:17 PM On 3/31/2023 at 1:46 PM, JamesW said: Asking for recusal: https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_9e17d63a-cff2-11ed-a7bc-7b96223555b7.html?fbclid=IwAR2Ow1W42IrY61Z-Rdia84pWX1KKLZZV7Vu_V5cSo_xex1YJValadVHcx1w You’re welcome, everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:01 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:01 PM That's a request, we will have to see what happens. The Judge may not recuse themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RECarry Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:14 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:14 PM Would submitting a pile of these for JB and the Judges be helpful? Request_for_Investigation_Fillable blank.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:17 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:17 PM On 3/31/2023 at 3:01 PM, mab22 said: That's a request, we will have to see what happens. The Judge may not recuse themselves. I hope they don’t LOL. Muddies the waters even more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:52 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:52 PM https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_9e17d63a-cff2-11ed-a7bc-7b96223555b7.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:59 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 08:59 PM Hey GPAC nice job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 09:04 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 09:04 PM Ok new article on it all 🤷♂️ https://www.mom-at-arms.com/post/copy-of-mom-at-arms-research-does-it-again-changes-the-course-of-gun-control-related-events Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted March 31, 2023 at 11:12 PM Share Posted March 31, 2023 at 11:12 PM On 3/31/2023 at 4:04 PM, steveTA84 said: Ok new article on it all 🤷♂️ https://www.mom-at-arms.com/post/copy-of-mom-at-arms-research-does-it-again-changes-the-course-of-gun-control-related-events Added into link. Checkmate, Judge Rochford. Your own words regarding “appearance of bias” as a judge, which is clearly an issue here with all this stuff IMG_8983.MOV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RECarry Posted April 1, 2023 at 02:22 AM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 02:22 AM Well done. Shared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 1, 2023 at 03:08 AM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 03:08 AM Uh oh! Added in! https://patch.com/illinois/lakeforest/elizabeth-rochford-illinois-supreme-court-candidate-2nd-district What other issues do you intend to address during your campaign? Inclusion of all people is a priority in my work and personal life every day. I am a past Chair of the LCBA Community Outreach & Diversity Committee and I continue to be an active member. Addressing bias in the courthouse and the community is a lifelong journey of self-examination and improvement. My experience includes co-chairing an Illinois Judges Association initiative called “Building Confidence in the Legal System,” an educational series focusing on racial and other inequities in and around the courthouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RECarry Posted April 1, 2023 at 01:02 PM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 01:02 PM On 3/31/2023 at 9:22 PM, RECarry said: Well done. Shared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 1, 2023 at 05:44 PM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 05:44 PM (edited) LOL omg I need to stop digging. This should seal the deal. Judge Rochford (and O’Brien) knows better and needs to recuse herself now. Added into MAA link as referenced earlier Edited April 1, 2023 at 05:54 PM by steveTA84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted April 1, 2023 at 08:10 PM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 08:10 PM On 3/31/2023 at 6:12 PM, steveTA84 said: Added into link. Checkmate, Judge Rochford. Your own words regarding “appearance of bias” as a judge, which is clearly an issue here with all this stuff IMG_8983.MOV 135.9 MB · 6 downloads No working video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 1, 2023 at 08:49 PM Share Posted April 1, 2023 at 08:49 PM It’s in the link at the bottom https://www.mom-at-arms.com/post/copy-of-mom-at-arms-research-does-it-again-changes-the-course-of-gun-control-related-events Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted April 2, 2023 at 01:39 AM Share Posted April 2, 2023 at 01:39 AM On 4/1/2023 at 3:49 PM, steveTA84 said: It’s in the link at the bottom https://www.mom-at-arms.com/post/copy-of-mom-at-arms-research-does-it-again-changes-the-course-of-gun-control-related-events On 4/1/2023 at 3:10 PM, JTHunter said: No working video. Instead of the monster 136 MB bandwidth killer video file, here is a downsized much smaller video (about 1/10 the size) that should suffice. 🤣 480p size 14 MB IMG_8983_480P.mov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 3, 2023 at 11:49 AM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 11:49 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2smartby1/2 Posted April 3, 2023 at 06:02 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 06:02 PM On 4/1/2023 at 12:44 PM, steveTA84 said: LOL omg I need to stop digging. This should seal the deal. Judge Rochford (and O’Brien) knows better and needs to recuse herself now. Added into MAA link as referenced earlier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 3, 2023 at 07:31 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 07:31 PM (edited) So I just got word that this whole thing caused other folks to start digging and they’re finding things that were missed and are passing it on to the appropriate people. The fact these judges took photos holding anti-gun lobbying group’s stuff while campaigning (instead of just posing for pics) probably adds fuel to the fire Grassroots guerrilla activism FTW Edited April 3, 2023 at 07:31 PM by steveTA84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted April 3, 2023 at 07:47 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 07:47 PM On 4/3/2023 at 2:31 PM, steveTA84 said: So I just got word that this whole thing caused other folks to start digging and they’re finding things that were missed and are passing it on to the appropriate people. The fact these judges took photos holding anti-gun lobbying group’s stuff while campaigning (instead of just posing for pics) probably adds fuel to the fire Grassroots guerrilla activism FTW Is this all part of that social justice I keep hearing about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:03 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:03 PM On 4/3/2023 at 2:31 PM, steveTA84 said: So I just got word that this whole thing caused other folks to start digging and they’re finding things that were missed and are passing it on to the appropriate people. The fact these judges took photos holding anti-gun lobbying group’s stuff while campaigning (instead of just posing for pics) probably adds fuel to the fire Grassroots guerrilla activism FTW Can you elaborate on “things that were missed”, and what it means in the bigger picture? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:19 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:19 PM Oh Rich LOL. There’s one major difference here. This is revolving around a law that was enacted in which it’s almost impossible to see how it’s not a conflict of interest, which considering it’s not only Pritzker, but Welch and lobbying groups involved, it’s way different than your examples. But please, continue to complain https://capitolfax.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:20 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:20 PM On 4/3/2023 at 4:03 PM, mab22 said: Can you elaborate on “things that were missed”, and what it means in the bigger picture? Proof that not only does Moms Demand action support the judges, but one in particular openly supports and by her actions, endorses and promotes Moms Demand Action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:32 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:32 PM Rich Miller also overlooked this little problem. They can’t claim to be impartial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurimodin Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:43 PM Share Posted April 3, 2023 at 09:43 PM On 4/3/2023 at 4:19 PM, steveTA84 said: Oh Rich LOL. There’s one major difference here. This is revolving around a law that was enacted in which it’s almost impossible to see how it’s not a conflict of interest, which considering it’s not only Pritzker, but Welch and lobbying groups involved, it’s way different than your examples. But please, continue to complain https://capitolfax.com After they passed this unconstitutional "law" Rich went on a tirade about how since the Bill of Rights were Amendments then they were "afterthoughts" and not that important........its just communists showing their true colors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted April 4, 2023 at 03:43 AM Share Posted April 4, 2023 at 03:43 AM When it comes to the Justices receiving $500,000 in excess contributions. If I read the law correctly. Did/Do/ Have they/ the Justices have to turn anything in excess of $500,000 over to the state treasure. From Public Act 102-0909 HB0716 Enrolled LRB102 10068 RJF 15388 b (b-5) Judicial elections. (1) In addition to any other provision of this section, a candidate political committee established to spport or oppose a candidate seeking nomination to the supreme Court, Appellate Court, or Circuit Court may not: (A) accept contributions from any entity that does not disclose the identity of those who make contributions to the entity, except for contributions that are not required to be itemized by this Code; or (B) accept contributions from any out-of-state person, as defined in this Article. (1.1) In addition to any other provision of this Section, a political committee that is self-funding, as described in subsection (h) of this Section, and is established to support or oppose a candidate seeking nomination, election, or retention to the Supreme Court, the Appellate Court, or the Circuit Court may not accept contributions from any single person, other than the judicial candidate or the candidate's immediate family, in a cumulative amount that exceeds $500,000 in any election cycle. Any contribution in excess of the limits in this paragraph (1.1) shall escheat to the State of Illinois. Any political committee that receives such a contribution shall immediately forward the amount that exceeds $500,000 to the State Treasurer who shall deposit the funds into the State Treasury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts