2smartby1/2

I'd like to know as well. So is there a chance of a PI soon?

Happy Friday! Happy Father's day weekend! What great news (especially with the brace ban news as well!)

It is a twisted story. AR-10 -> AR-15 ->XM-16 The Air Force fielded the AR-15 (eventually GAU's) while everyone else went XM-16. The Air Force (and Stoner) didn't think Forward Assist was necessary, hence the split. That is the "major" difference between the original (slick side) AR-15 and the XM-16 (there were a few other smaller updates like gates and stuff). If you look at some of the weapons our "advisors" used early on in Vietnam, along with the original Colt Sporter, you will see that they are slick-sides. https://thecoltar15resource.com/2020/12/20/december-1964-shooting-times-article-on-the-colt-sporter/ There are even original military lowers out there stamped both AR-15 AND XM-16, but that was all during the early transitions. However, the early AR-15 mentioned above is not the same as the "civilian" AR-15's, with the big difference being the lowers are cut differently to accommodate full auto capability. The semi-only cuts (high shelf vs low shelf vs full cut) were never used by the military as they cannot accommodate the parts needed for select fire function. Edit, I should add. If one looks, the different cuts are available. But the point was that the "civilian' AR-15's were mostly semi-auto only. However, there were full-auto AR-15's available to the public. While "legal" at the time, I'm not sure if that was Colt's intention or not, being that they were also selling their Semi-auto only Sporter. It is a fascinating history. \ LOL, look at those EARLY charging handles on the original AR's.

Caulkins should leave Illinois. Or maybe just move to Crook County.

The good news is this nonsense makes it that much easier to get rid of the FOID.

🙏

That is a little high. I'm gonna guess 0.8005882300

PICA update - Number of Individuals Completing a Disclosure: 8,143 Total Disclosures: 24,381 Firearms Disclosures: 15,877 Accessory Disclosures: 8,335 Ammunition Disclosures: 169 Up to a whopping 1/3rd of a percent. Stay strong.

That sucks

I thought denial of a Constitutional right is always irreparable harm?

Yeah, seems like that just helped speed things up.

If the Naperville AWB gets struck down as unconstitutional, what happens to the city next door? The city of Aurora has had an AWB on the books for decades. I don't think it is enforced, but I assume it goes bye-bye. Same with Crook County and a few others.

I was half-way listening to it. It sounds like +$7M in indirect contributions from a specific source. I wasn't fully clear on that source, but I think it was someone who leads up anti-gun fundraising. Maybe someone else can chime in with a clearer picture.

I am feeling, dare I say, optimistic about how things are going.

They got a big win (injunction) on Forced Reset Triggers, so that is a good way to get on the map (again?). I heard they had a bit of a spotty past.