steveTA84

Each side gets 40 or 45 minutes to present. So she obviously didn’t want to take much away from the 2A lawyers, just arguing in their favor for a few minutes. It’s massive and has never happened before and because of this, puts significant pressure on the 7th and signals they are also not ruling out getting involved at SCOTUS with this should the 7th be stupid and make an idiotic ruling

This. Harmeet Dhillon will be the one arguing, not some 2nd rate DOJ lawyer. This is nothing but positive news

Yes, it’s a very good thing. Harmeet arguing herself. She is RABIDLY pro-2A. This brings significant exposure (and pressure) to the case and the courts

HUGE!!!!

Oh look, and the corrupt and bought Justice Rochford issued the opinion. I’m SHOCKED

Yep. And once you know the names of these worms who are filing witness slips against what ILCarry send out, makes you really wish a red flag order would be filed against them lol, after all, they love that stuff. They don’t deserve to have these rights, they actively work against them. Anyone who thinks gun owners are all in one boat are delusional. That all said, the ends of both spectrums have more common ground in this than the worthless middle of the road team D and team R people who truly don’t believe in the right to be armed, but rather are just mere hobbyists that will do what their party tells them to do

Denied Snope and Ocean State Tactical and said “maybe in a term or two we’ll take it up”

We have members here who are FOID holders who actively work against ILCarry and gun owners just because they’re partisan hacks and worthless in the fight (not talking about some of the more vocal posters here). I loathe those worthless “people” more than the black robes who rule over us. Heck, a good portion of FOID holders LOVE the FOID and think it’s “common sense”, even though it’s completely irrelevant in the digital age

Ballot box gave us the politicians that legislate our rights away, jury box is useless to get them back, what’s the other box? Lol. just saying, there doesn’t seem to be a political solution in this state and circuit

Cool, now we get to see who blinks first: the ISP enforcing the law or the gun owner who did nothing wrong making a stand against the ISP

sigh. Father Mike. The memories we have together https://chicagocitywire.com/stories/511437418-armed-member-of-pfleger-s-security-arrested-outside-his-church https://catholiccitizens.org/news/79421/bodyguard-chicagos-famous-anti-gun-priest-caught-illegal-gun/

Oh, tried many times……myself and many others. She either hasn’t seen it yet or doesn’t care/ignoring it