URGENT Legislative 12/31/12
#1
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:04 AM
I just recieved word that Senate President John Cullerton will attempt to pass a Feinstein style Semi-auto ban and magazine ban When the Senate reconvenes for their lame duck session on the 2nd of January.
At this time we have no bill numbers, but anticipate them using house bills passed over for floor amendments which would only take a matter of hours to clear committee and be ready for a final vote.
Legislative offices are open today. You need to call your state senator and urge them to vote no on any gun bans or magazine bans.
Then call your state representative and urge them to vote no on any gun ban or magazine ban.
Call today, call Wednesday, call every day until this is defeated. More to follow as I get details.
#2
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:06 AM
#3
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:28 AM
Credit: Prairie Pucker via Bud...
NRA, ISRA, SAF... USAF Vet.. Former LEO...
#4
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:32 AM
Edited by ChiShooter, 31 December 2012 - 11:32 AM.
#5
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:32 AM
#6
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:38 AM
Handguns are about 50% semi autos...
#7
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:45 AM
armadroid, on 31 December 2012 - 11:38 AM, said:
Handguns are about 50% semi autos...
That allows them to keep "the moral high ground" and say see its the courts fault now ours.
Remember to contact your reps for the PAST legislative session not the new one, or just do both.
Edited by Patriots & Tyrants, 31 December 2012 - 11:47 AM.
#8
Posted 31 December 2012 - 11:47 AM
I am pretty sure he is anti-gun though.
edit: I was wrong after searching.
Maybe they went out for lunch! He is pro gun!
Edited by Molly B., 01 January 2013 - 11:35 PM.
Todd requested we not list names
#9
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:09 PM
Only criminals are safe in 'Gun Free Zones'
#10
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:12 PM
#11
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:14 PM
here office phone in DeKalb has been disconnected.
Her email bounces as "no such addressee"
I suspect a conspiracy
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#12
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:20 PM
In Todd We Trust!
"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual...as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded over, controlled, supervised, and taken care of." - Dr. Suzanne Gratia Hupp, Killeen Texas Luby's massacre survivor
"Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion... in private self-defense." - John Adams
"Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell 'Fire!' in a crowded theater." - Peter Venetoklis
#13
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:21 PM
#14
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:29 PM
#15
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:31 PM
Bud, on 31 December 2012 - 12:14 PM, said:
here office phone in DeKalb has been disconnected.
Her email bounces as "no such addressee"
I suspect a conspiracy
I called both, left one message (Johnson), and talked to on secretary (Pritchard).
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#16
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:33 PM
#17
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:35 PM
Only criminals are safe in 'Gun Free Zones'
#18
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:36 PM
ISRA Member
GOA Member
All around great guy
Original HB997 or FOID carry. No more compromise.
#19
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:38 PM
#20
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:38 PM
#21
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:41 PM
"…Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor."
"…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully …
[When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission."
~Gandhi~
#22
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:42 PM
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 2
#23
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:43 PM
#24
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:43 PM
#25
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:46 PM
Capt_Destro, on 31 December 2012 - 12:41 PM, said:
Those are your Federal reps you need to call your State Senator. If you don't know who he or she is, go here, enter your info and it will tell you
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#26
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:47 PM
#27
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:48 PM
Spoke to my one rep who also opposes a semi auto ban and favors concealed carry. Everyone else I had to talk to a machine
#28
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:51 PM
KarlJ, on 31 December 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:
Spoke to my one rep who also opposes a semi auto ban and favors concealed carry. Everyone else I had to talk to a machine
Call your "state" legislators, not the federal legislators at this time.
#29
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:52 PM
Bud, on 31 December 2012 - 12:46 PM, said:
Capt_Destro, on 31 December 2012 - 12:41 PM, said:
Those are your Federal reps you need to call your State Senator. If you don't know who he or she is, go here, enter your info and it will tell you
Wrote my Senators already, Kirk and Durbin.. D:
Just dying to see what views he has on the issue since I can't find anything.
Edit: Doing what you said with that link. need a few.
Steve Landek is mine.
Edited by Capt_Destro, 31 December 2012 - 12:55 PM.
"…Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor."
"…He who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully …
[When violence] is offered in self-defence or for the defence of the defenceless, it is an act of bravery far better than cowardly submission."
~Gandhi~
#30
Posted 31 December 2012 - 12:57 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


This topic is locked








