Jump to content

mab22

Members
  • Posts

    4,568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

2,116 profile views

mab22's Achievements

Member

Member (24/24)

  1. So Democrats using he law to thier advantage? (Purple on) THAT’ll never happen (purple off)
  2. Case appears to be still kicking. 2023MR4 PRITZKER, JAY ROBERTLast Search | Information | Dispositions | History | Payments | Fines & Fees Date Entry Judge Entered Under: ACCURACY FIREARMS LLC ET AL 04/30/2024 Letter and Order entered by Appellate Court and filed. (Appellant's Motion For Extension Of Time To File Brief granted in Appellate Court Case# 5-24-0112) UNASSIGNED
  3. They don't want to actually fight it in court. So, as long as no one is charged the Marxists party gets to keep it's threat over the rest of us.
  4. Don't we already know all of this, we keep hearing the SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER. Heller, NYSRPA, Mcdonald, Caetano, modern arms are protected, handguns are protected, etc, etc, etc. There doesn't seem to be anything new! Yet here is everyone in Marxist state shouting " shall not be infringed!" Rant over for now.....
  5. Do you really think people come here to post “fake news”, and outrageous things about hard left wing judges and hard left wing politicians? I honestly didn’t doubt it, I would love to hear the judge make the statement on record, but I believed it.
  6. Never forget California and NewYork. East coast nuts, West coast nuts…. And _______ we are in the middle. 🤡
  7. According to the inter-webs, there should be a recording and transcript of everything said. I don’t know if things can be stricken from the audio or transcript. But you will want BOTH, and you should be able to request it.
  8. If there is any doubt, it “should” be in the transcript, or whatever they do these days with the court reporter. Shouldn’t it?
  9. Is it safe to say at this point that a Federal challenge to FOID could be brought, that’s in an infringement, now that this just changed to someone demanding their permission slip?
  10. Not trying to scare anyone. I don't think we have had any victories here, the law is still on the books and there are NO injunctions that I know of.
  11. You go first and see if they refuse or not. What’s to prevent State or Locals from using another county, OR the sheriff facing some obstruction charge or reduced funding for not complying and caving in? Look at the current federal REGIME, and how they use law enforcement and threats that oppose them. BTW - How do you think it will work out for those in Cook County or other hardcore Marxist areas?
  12. I don’t know about that. A Sheriff is not going to stop the State police or local police from enforcing PICA, nor or the going tell the judge handing your case that is unconstitutional.
  13. I could also be that people feel like it doesn't make a difference when they pull something like PICA.
×
×
  • Create New...