Jump to content

Come and Take It: Canadians Aren't Complying with New Gun Law


mauserme
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2021/12/31/come-and-take-it-canadians-arent-complying-with-new-gun-law-n2601237

 

Come and Take It: Canadians Aren't Complying with New Gun Law

 
Posted: Dec 31, 2021 12:35 PM
 

Well, good on ya, Canada. It seems the motto ‘come and take it’ isn’t unique to just Americans. Our neighbors to the north have a new gun law. It’s something that anti-gun liberals want here nationwide. All Canadians that owned firearms that have been included in the nation’s latest ban on so-called assault weapons must turn them over to authorities. The only problem is that they’re not doing it (via The Reload😞

 

Few gun owners are turning in weapons recently been made illegal by the Canadian government.

That’s according to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). They said Canadians had only turned in 160 of the recently-outlawed firearms for destruction since the announcement of the ban.

“The Canadian Firearms Program (CFP) can confirm that, as of December 9, 2021, 18 firearms (formerly classified as restricted) affected by the May 1, 2020 Order in Council (OIC) have been deactivated,” Sgt. Caroline Duval, an RCMP spokesperson, told iPolitics on Friday. “In addition, there have been 142 OIC-affected firearms recorded as surrendered to a public agency for destruction since May 1, 2020.”

The announcement comes as the April 2022 deadline for the “assault weapon” confiscation order rapidly approaches. The Canadian government’s plan to collect the affected weapons has been rife with problems since it was announced. Consulting fees and enforcement planning have resulted in a bloated budget before even a single weapon has been “bought back,” and a concrete plan for the buyback program is yet to be finalized. It now appears affected gun owners are hesitant to give up their guns.

The difficulties experienced by the Canadian effort and a similar gun confiscation effort in New Zealand may impact the debate over implementing a similar policy in the United States. While gun-control advocates have shunned confiscation policies in the past, some Democrats have warmed to the idea of taking AR-15s and similar guns in recent years. Congressman Eric Swalwell (D., Calif.) wrote an op-ed in favor of confiscation in 2018. Vice President Kamala Harris said she supports a mandatory buyback scheme similar to Canada’s policy during a 2020 presidential primary forum hosted by gun-control group March for Our Lives. Beto O’Rourke garnered much attention when he declared, “heck yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47” during the same campaign. He has stuck with the policy since entering the 2022 Texas gubernatorial race despite the idea polling poorly.

It seems the only people who have willingly turned over their firearms are the Australians. As the publication noted, buybacks are hardly a guarantee—they mostly fail as well. These are also commonly owned firearms in the United States. Millions own AR-15 rifles for hunting, target practice, and for self-defense. There are millions of so-called high-capacity magazines as well which makes laws against those items illogical as well. Liberals deem a 15-round magazine to be high-capacity. It’s commonplace. In a year where the credibility around government authority has been shattered by serial abuse due to the COVID pandemic, I don’t blame anyone who is just finished complying with mandates.   

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worked on a couple of consulting projects in Australia.  The estimate is that in the major cities maybe 50% of the banned firearms were turned in, and outside of those metro areas, maybe 10%.  I worked out of Canberra and once they found out I liked to shoot and hunt they took me rabbit hunting, which at that time was more like our prairie dog hunting.  Hundreds of rabbits running around in fields.  Plenty of those banned firearms in use.  In the rural areas no one seemed to care.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2022 at 7:01 PM, DoYouFeelLucky said:

Plenty of those banned firearms in use.

 

In the rural areas no one seemed to care.

 

 

Of those banned guns you saw there, what was probably the most common type? I suspect it would be some kind of semi-auto .22LR.

 

Being in a rural area there is much like here.  The authorities are too far away to be helpful or effective and the people have to be self-reliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2022 at 10:42 PM, JTHunter said:

 

Of those banned guns you saw there, what was probably the most common type? I suspect it would be some kind of semi-auto .22LR.

 

Being in a rural area there is much like here.  The authorities are too far away to be helpful or effective and the people have to be self-reliant.

Many Ruger 10/22 variants, however there seemed to be lots of WWII vintage M1, Garand, and other models of that era.  Browning A5's were also popular.  A couple people had more recent AR-15 rifles.  I am not an expert on vintage military weapons, so not sure what all was represented.  I used a borrowed Marlin 60 to plink away at the wascally wabbits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...