Jump to content

2A4Cook

Members
  • Posts

    5,165
  • Joined

Everything posted by 2A4Cook

  1. 2A4Cook

    Gun prices

    So, distributors give small retailers approximately the classic retail less 20% price on S&W?
  2. The FOID was ushered in at the behest of King Richard Daley I during the tumultuous 1960's, in an effort to dissuade Blacks from legally obtaining firearms. The FOID is racist at its core.
  3. My area was redistricted. Oh, what joy, to go from LWW idiot Marie Newman to this imbecile.
  4. "I think a better argument could be that outlawing their ability to sell an item in common use and protected under the 2nd infringes on their 2nd rights under the Bruen test, as mauserme outlined." Absolutely agreed, but I don't know if that would allow a gun shop to recoup its financial losses. If the right is an individual's 2A right to purchase these items, does that necessarily confer upon the commercial entity the right to recoup its losses due to its inability to sell them to those individuals?
  5. If it's solely an issue of commercial sale of semi-autos and "large capacity" magazines, I would think the ball is in Range USA's court to sue the crap out of them if HP refuses to "grandfather" (exempt) that business from the ban. You can't tell a gun shop that just opened that, "hey, now, we're not gonna let you sell semi-auto rifles or magazines over 10 rounds."
  6. Piss off an ex wife or ex girlfriend who knows you have guns? This is going to get the same abuse that orders of protection get from spouses looking to get an early advantage in divorce/custody proceedings.
  7. Ammo transfer generated a 5 digit approval number. This language is printed in a box at the bottom of the verification page it prints: 430 ILCS 65/3(a-10) Notwithstanding item (2) of subsection (a) of this Section, any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer and who desires to transfer or sell a firearm or firearms to any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer shall, before selling or transferring the firearms, contact a federal firearm license dealer under paragraph (1) of subsection (a-15) of this Section to conduct the transfer or the Illinois State Police with the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card number to determine the validity of the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card under State and federal law including the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. This subsection shall not be effective until January 1, 2024. Until that date the transferor shall contact the Illinois State Police with the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card number to determine the validity of the card. The Department of State Police may adopt rules concerning the implementation of this subsection. The Department of State Police shall provide the seller or transferor an approval number if the purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card is valid. Approvals issued by the Department for the purchase of a firearm pursuant to this subsection are valid for 30 days from the date of issue. So, it would appear that the law remains the same. You only need to "determine the validity of the card." They are trying to backdoor a registry by tricking sellers into this crapola. Registries are illegal under federal law. This is overreach at its finest.
  8. Typical, Democrat "I want I want I want! Gimme my way NOW!" childish crap. Screw your rights, they want something!
  9. The real "assault weapons" are Democrat ballots!
  10. Indoctrinated, spoiled, smart-mouthed little punk who knows nothing yet thinks he can get his way if he screams loud enough. That, and he loves attention and getting paid for getting that undue attention. He'd be a great ANTIFA member, except that he's thrust himself in front of so many cameras that he can't be an anonymous little punk like the rest of them. Maybe he can get a shot as Kamalamadingdong's new speech writer.
  11. All three felonies, and at least one involving unlawful use of a firearm. "Only Foxx can fix it." Freaking joke!
  12. These people just never stop. "If they can't buy them, they can't possess them." If they do this, I hope these shops sue the crap out of them for their losses, along with a CA by a resident class representative for violating their 2A rights by essentially prohibiting them from purchasing these weapons in common use. There really needs to be some kind of enforcement arm with respect to these decisions (outside of the years long struggle of going back to court) in light of these lawless Democrats who flip the bird at Federal and SCOTUS authority and do whatever the heck they want to do. They have no legal authority, for example, to declare "sanctuary states" and "sanctuary cities." So, why are these people not individually civilly and criminally liable for their lawlessness??? Sovereign immunity does not extend to acts which these "public servants" are not lawfully authorized to commit. Again, everyone just sits back and lets them get away with it.
  13. What's more important is who lives by it. Hillary? Check! DNC? Check! Pelosi, Biden and Co? Check! Alleged "Trump-Russian collusion" = Hillary, DNC, Biden collusion with Russians. Alleged Trump "quid pro quo" in Ukraine = Biden extortion of Ukrainian President/quid pro quo to protect Hunter & Bursima. Alleged January 6th "insurrection" = Dem soft coup in stealing 2020 POTUS election. I could go on ...
  14. Yep, they're just retuning the narrative in order to get their zombies to start crying about "semi-automatic rifles," so that they can pursue a more blanket ban. Anybody who trusts the AP to be "intellectually honest" must be intellectually challenged.
  15. He also couldn't define what an "assault weapon" is. Why should that stop Biden from nominating him? Can you name a single member of the Biden geriatric medicine cabinet who is actually qualified for his or her position???
  16. And, that's just it. Now, since they have lost control of SCOTUS for the first time in over half a century and the Court is rendering rulings they do not agree with, the Dems have gone (even further) rogue, and essentially proclaimed SCOTUS as illegitimate. Like NY, they will do whatever they damned well feel like doing, with the obvious internal reasoning being, "what can the Supreme Court actually DO to us if we flip them the bird?" And, with these totalitarians being in charge of every aspect of the federal government, the answer to that is, "absolutely nothing." NOBODY is enforcing any laws the Dems do not agree with, or they are selectively enforcing laws only against the Dems' political opponents. Let's face it: we're living in a pseudo-USSR at the moment.
  17. Easy. Democrat-appointed "judges" are corrupt idealogues who ignore the law and can be counted upon to rule in favor of the Democrat agenda, law and constitution be damned.
  18. The Second Amendment Foundation started all this hubbub. They need to follow up, and if they got catfished, own up to it!
  19. Still no update on this? If it's false, how long does it take to release a denial, especially where there is the potential for UPS, Brownell's and others to lose business???
  20. You have to possess a C&R license to own an SBR in Illinois. The recent SCOTUS decision (not to mention Heller), and the EPA decisiion would prohibit the AFT from going through with the new rule, I would think ... not that something as silly as a SCOTUS ruling would stop them.
  21. That didn't involve the use of a 9mm lung obliterator high-powered assault rifle AR-16 automatic high caliber phonograph cornpopper in ultra-leftist Highland Park.
×
×
  • Create New...