Jump to content

2A4Cook

Members
  • Posts

    5,260
  • Joined

Recent Profile Visitors

1,431 profile views

2A4Cook's Achievements

Member

Member (24/24)

  1. What a scummy move. The attorneys know darned well that they will be consolidated, but apparently are trying to increase the work and legal costs for S&W to have to multiply everything x12 until they get this accomplished. Scumbaggery with a capital "D." Same goes for having them filed in Lake County ... c'mon already. If Democrats can't illegalize gun ownership, they'll go after the manufacturers. If they can't legislate them out of existence, they'll try to sue them out of existence. Immunity acts be damned. The fact that the product worked as intended be damned. Much easier than trying to correct the societal, mental health and criminal problems that their idiotic policies have caused over the past 50-60 years. If they're looking for someone to blame, they need only look in the mirror. On a related note ... where's the attention/outrage/lawsuits over Waukesha??? 68 freaking people killed or maimed, but it doesn't fit any of their multiple political/societal agendas. There should be 68 separate lawsuits filed against the DNC in Waukesha County, WI. And those would actually be directed against the proper cause ...
  2. They don't care. Flip the SCOTUS the bird because they don't control it anymore, stomp on our rights, unlawfully prosecute us when we resist, tax us to defend the lawsuits brought against them for violating our rights, do this for years and wait for SCOTUS while they continue prosecuting gun owners as criminals when they, themselves, are the criminals. And stupid sheep just cheer them on.
  3. SCOTUS rulings only apply to Democrats when they have a majority of their libby activists in robes.
  4. There are guys on this board with a lot more guns than that "arsenal." Hundreds of rounds of ammo ... SLACKER! Seriously, the bond is ridiculous for someone being grabbed out of his car based solely on a phone call from a family member in an estate dispute with him. If only he wore a black hoodie and torched a couple of police cars, he'd have been out on an I-Bond in an hour or two.
  5. Knock on wood ... but judges sometimes play devil's advocate during oral argument and decide the opposite of where they appeared to be going. Not saying it's the case here, just suggesting that a win for the P shouldn't be taken for granted just yet.
  6. Mark Fairchild, IIRC (that was my first election after hitting voting age). They made sure Lyndon LaRouche could never threaten their system again by locking him up on credit card fraud charges. They threatened Ross Perot's daughter by sending him photos of dead bodies with his daughter's head superimposed on them, then tried to claim he was crazy and it never happened when he went public with it. For the love of God, they just won't leave Trump alone until he's no longer deemed a threat. Some freakin' "democracy."
  7. Face it: You could take a roadkill opossum, put a "D" on its picture, and Democrats will vote for it. I give you, John Fetterman.
  8. These criminals need to be held accountable for flipping the bird at the Constitution and the SCOTUS and illegally stomping on our rights.
  9. If you can't even get the "rational" people to vote, do you seriously believe they're going to do anything risky and strenuous???
  10. Can't go to AZ now, freakin' LA transplants who fled CA because the Democrats made the state unlivable have decided to destroy AZ, too. What's left? Arkansas?
  11. The majority of the people in this state are complete idiots. I need to find a way out of here. Even Pekau lost to a clown whose platform was climate change, abortion and gun control. Yet, the morons will have the gall to cry when they pay for gas, pay for food, pay for utilities and get taxed out of their homes. What do you do with people who enjoy getting repeatedly kicked in the nads?
  12. Their including single family or multi-family "structures" implies dwellings. A shed is a shed and a garage is a garage. Agreed, it's poorly written and ambiguous -- and probably by intent. If you have proper berms, walls or whatever, it's not likely to endanger anyone. "Likely," though, is a subjective term. The more I think about it, yes, I agree it is probably aimed at people who have private ranges on their property. That being the case, the dingalings should just pass an ordinance with safety requirements for private ranges. That's reasonable, if done in good faith. (Do Democrats ever act in good faith?)
×
×
  • Create New...