EdDinIL

Distributed for conference on 11/21/2025.

Unless the GOP wants to nuke the filibuster, Smallbore is right, we don't have the Senate, majority vote or not. There's no way the 45 Dems let a pro-2A vote through.

Cert granted. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/102025zor_19m2.pdf

Cert granted EDIT: in Hemani. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/102025zor_19m2.pdf

Can somebody explain to me what the heck happened in this case? I saw an explosion of tweets yesterday about this case, a mix of "We won!" and "This is horrible!", because somehow the judge ordered 2AF and FPC to release their member lists.

A vampire law would turn "you can't carry if it's posted" to "you can't carry unless it's posted", right? Cool, new Browning stickers!

What's the general rule of thumb, SCOTUS will only hear 2-3 2A cases per term or some arbitrary nonsense? Well, if that's true, PICA better hurry up and get in line before it gets punted to 2027 now that SCOTUS granted cert to Wolford v Lopez-Hawaii.

I'm sure there are lots of different sources for this info, but this video from Guns & Gadgets does a good summary without being too lengthy. The short story is that Gov. Walz wants to ram a bunch of anti-2A things down Minnesota's throat in one giant push.

The state's game plan: PICA loss Freedom week(s) begin RIFL is passed and becomes law, shutting down sales again Legal slog begins anew while more FFLs wither and die Close enough?

Washington Gun Law (William Kirk) gave a breakdown of the hearing and his thoughts. He said we should know "in a couple of weeks". Is that based on some rule the court follows for issuing a ruling, or is he just assuming that because other cases take a similar amount of time?

Can we end up stuck in an endless loop between the 7CA and Judge McGlynn until he "gets it right" (in 7CA's opinion), basically delaying things for as long as the powers-that-be deem necessary?

I didn't listen to any of the live stream, so I appreciated the tweets I was reading, even if they were infuriating at times. I didn't see anything about "what's next". Did the panel indicate what it thought its timeline would be, or are we back to playing a waiting game for some undefined number of months?

Assuming SCOTUS doesn't chicken out and turn it down because there's still no circuit split.

Thank you both.

They GVPC is probably going to have a watch party complete with snacks and drinks.