bmyers Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:05 PM Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:05 PM If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it.
jmeyers Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:09 PM Author Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:09 PM Lucky for me I got time on my side, just turned 30 a week ago. They'll have to wait a while to stop dealing with me
EnCrypt Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:13 PM Posted June 10, 2016 at 03:13 PM If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it.lol dang dude, little morbid.
chislinger Posted June 10, 2016 at 06:40 PM Posted June 10, 2016 at 06:40 PM Lucky for me I got time on my side, just turned 30 a week ago. They'll have to wait a while to stop dealing with me If Lisa Madigan sends you a box of chocolate DO NOT EAT IT!!!!!!!!
lawman Posted June 10, 2016 at 08:07 PM Posted June 10, 2016 at 08:07 PM If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it. Then a motion to dismiss for lack of standing will be forthcoming along with a victory dance.
jmeyers Posted June 11, 2016 at 02:51 PM Author Posted June 11, 2016 at 02:51 PM We have some motions we'll be filing on this matter in the coming weeks to help speed the process along
jmeyers Posted June 21, 2016 at 11:20 AM Author Posted June 21, 2016 at 11:20 AM Just to keep everyone in the loop, June 8 we mailed them a courtesy letter asking to please follow the court order that THEY requested. As of now, no response to 3 emails nor the mailed letter...
kwc Posted June 21, 2016 at 02:21 PM Posted June 21, 2016 at 02:21 PM Just to keep everyone in the loop, June 8 we mailed them a courtesy letter asking to please follow the court order that THEY requested. As of now, no response to 3 emails nor the mailed letter... At this point, if they all of a sudden became responsive, I'd get suspicious...
jmeyers Posted June 21, 2016 at 03:25 PM Author Posted June 21, 2016 at 03:25 PM kwc - me to My thing is, they petition the court for remand for a hearing, get the court ordered remand, and now are failing to act on a court order. Im sure theres a law or 2 about acting on court orders... oh ya, its called contempt and sanctions
jmeyers Posted July 3, 2016 at 08:28 PM Author Posted July 3, 2016 at 08:28 PM A Petition for Rule to Show Cause has been filed and a Order signed for failure to act on a Court Order for REMAND from March 2016. Hearing date is scheduled for July 26. We shall see their reason for not honoring the court order they asked for, nor communicating with us about it.
Mr. Fife Posted July 3, 2016 at 08:41 PM Posted July 3, 2016 at 08:41 PM The Schmitz family had a tragedy recently. I hope they don't use that as an excuse to drag this on. Please just be righteous and do the right thing everyone. We are all real people with real issues, and not just pawns to play with.
jmeyers Posted July 3, 2016 at 11:35 PM Author Posted July 3, 2016 at 11:35 PM Mr. Fife,While Leo P Schmitz is named in the suit, he has yet to show up in court, nor is he the one responsible for providing the hearing. For record, they've had the Court Order for REMAND since March 24, 2016 with proposed hearing dates being sent at least 5 times with only 1 of those times being responded to that the AG would "get back to us"
Mr. Fife Posted July 3, 2016 at 11:45 PM Posted July 3, 2016 at 11:45 PM I wasn't implying any unrighteousness at you jmeyers. I want you to have your day in court, and win.
jmeyers Posted July 4, 2016 at 12:03 AM Author Posted July 4, 2016 at 12:03 AM Ah, I honestly can't wait to see what their excuse for ignoring court order and attempt after attempt at getting it scheduled is.
jmeyers Posted July 4, 2016 at 01:32 PM Author Posted July 4, 2016 at 01:32 PM · Hidden by mauserme, July 4, 2016 at 01:35 PM - Requested Hidden by mauserme, July 4, 2016 at 01:35 PM - Requested For record keeping, heres the Petition for Rule to Show cause that was filed.Petition-RuleToShowCause_Redacted.pdf
jmeyers Posted July 4, 2016 at 02:32 PM Author Posted July 4, 2016 at 02:32 PM Petition for Rule to Show cause Petition-RuleToShowCause_Redacted.pdf
jmeyers Posted July 25, 2016 at 01:38 PM Author Posted July 25, 2016 at 01:38 PM Our friends won't set a Administrative Hearing thats been court ordered but they have filed a Motion to Vacate the Order to Show Cause (invite to a hearing on contempt) We'll see how this holds up tomorrow at 10amPDF3376.PDF
Burger Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:16 AM Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:16 AM We'll see how this holds up tomorrow at 10am It is after 10am. Any update?
jmeyers Posted July 28, 2016 at 02:44 AM Author Posted July 28, 2016 at 02:44 AM The Motion of Contempt was vacated unfortunately. The judge has said he has the power to Order a REMAND but not to ORDER a REMAND by a certain date. The state says due to budget constraints they have not had a ALJ but as of the July 22 do have a ALJ And Im near the top for a hearing
GTX63 Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:47 PM Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:47 PM I can draw a line in the sand but I can't do anything if you cross it. OMG. Would it make any difference if you told the IRS and the court you haven't responded to their summons and court dates because you were a little tight on money? The "rigged system" mantra Trump keeps harping is not going to go away. It's ugly, frightening, intimidating and it's been here for a long time; now we are looking at it in the eye.
jmeyers Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:57 PM Author Posted July 28, 2016 at 12:57 PM Coincidently I was told but the Judge that I need to stop traveling, save my money, Im not required to be at the hearings With that said, I am stepping up my game and WILL BE present at every filing whether its a court appearance or a hearing from this point forward There is a Rule to Show cause for the contempt set for Sept 21 if they haven't gotten a ALJ hearing scheduled.
jmeyers Posted August 19, 2016 at 04:15 PM Author Posted August 19, 2016 at 04:15 PM This is moving forward. Notice of Hearing has been filed before the court as well as served on myself that I have a hearing regarding the appeal on September 7, 2016 in front of the ALJ under the procedures/guideane of the Administrative Procedure Act (5ILCS 100/10 et.seq), The FCCA Procedures (20 Ill. Adm. Code 1210.10) and the IL FCCA (430 ILSC 66/1)
Gamma Posted August 19, 2016 at 07:38 PM Posted August 19, 2016 at 07:38 PM are administrative hearings open to the public?
jmeyers Posted August 19, 2016 at 08:09 PM Author Posted August 19, 2016 at 08:09 PM Based on the location, it is my impression that its not but I'm trying to find out
kwc Posted September 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM Posted September 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM Best wishes tomorrow in the hearing!
jmeyers Posted September 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM Author Posted September 6, 2016 at 11:24 AM Preparations today, hearing tomorrow. Do i expect anything? Not at all, but it will be a interesting day to hopefully get a glimpse into the process for other users since I am the first to obtain a ALJ hearing.
jmeyers Posted September 7, 2016 at 03:41 PM Author Posted September 7, 2016 at 03:41 PM Preparations are done. I am proud to be the first person to go before the Administrative Law judge to contest the actions of the Illinois State Police. Hearing starts in about 20 minutes and is expected to be 1-2 hours. Will post my experience of this journey once we are done. See y'all on the other side!
EnCrypt Posted September 7, 2016 at 03:44 PM Posted September 7, 2016 at 03:44 PM Preparations are done. I am proud to be the first person to go before the Administrative Law judge to contest the actions of the Illinois State Police. Hearing starts in about 20 minutes and is expected to be 1-2 hours. Will post my experience of this journey once we are done. See y'all on the other side!good luck! can't wait to hear the details.
jmeyers Posted September 7, 2016 at 06:10 PM Author Posted September 7, 2016 at 06:10 PM So the cliff notes: Hearing was approximately an hour and 30 minutes and we were in a conference room. Present were myself, my attorney, an attorney for ISP (not AG) and the Administrative Law Judge It was conducted mostly like a trial, swearing of witness, Direct and Cross Examination. ALJ asked some questions for clarification to myself as well as the attorneys. Biggest thing I learned was the state is really reaching. They attempted to not get "substantially similar" admitted citing it has nothing to do. Also admitted that My Cancellation was really a revocation and they through the AG under the bus saying the term cancellation in circuit court was not meant to be said, and it should have been stated as revocation. Once a transcript is available, it will be posted. We now wait for the ALJ decision/recommendation.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.