257 replies to this topic

[bmyers]

If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it.

[EnCrypt]

If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it.

lol dang dude, little morbid.

[jmeyers]

Lucky for me I got time on my side, just turned 30 a week ago.  They'll have to wait a while to stop dealing with me

[chislinger]

Lucky for me I got time on my side, just turned 30 a week ago.  They'll have to wait a while to stop dealing with me

If Lisa Madigan sends you a box of chocolate DO NOT EAT IT!!!!!!!!

[lawman]

If they wait long enough, you will eventually die, then they don't have to deal with it.

 

Then a motion to dismiss for lack of standing will be forthcoming along with a victory dance.

[jmeyers]

We have some motions we'll be filing on this matter in the coming weeks to help speed the process along

[jmeyers]

Just to keep everyone in the loop, June 8 we mailed them a courtesy letter asking to please follow the court order that THEY requested.

 

As of now, no response to 3 emails nor the mailed letter...

[kwc]

Just to keep everyone in the loop, June 8 we mailed them a courtesy letter asking to please follow the court order that THEY requested.

 

As of now, no response to 3 emails nor the mailed letter...

 

At this point, if they all of a sudden became responsive, I'd get suspicious...

[jmeyers]

kwc - me to

 

My thing is, they petition the court for remand for a hearing, get the court ordered remand, and now are failing to act on a court order.

 

Im sure theres a law or 2 about acting on court orders... oh ya, its called contempt and sanctions

[jmeyers]

A Petition for Rule to Show Cause has been filed and a Order signed for failure to act on a Court Order for REMAND from March 2016.  Hearing date is scheduled for July 26.  

 

We shall see their reason for not honoring the court order they asked for, nor communicating with us about it.

[Mr. Fife]

The Schmitz family had a tragedy recently. I hope they don't use that as an excuse to drag this on. Please just be righteous and do the right thing everyone. We are all real people with real issues, and not just pawns to play with.

[jmeyers]

Mr. Fife,

While Leo P Schmitz is named in the suit, he has yet to show up in court, nor is he the one responsible for providing the hearing.  For record, they've had the Court Order for REMAND since March 24, 2016 with proposed hearing dates being sent  at least 5 times with only 1 of those times being responded to that the AG would "get back to us"

[Mr. Fife]

I wasn't implying any unrighteousness at you jmeyers. I want you to have your day in court, and win.

[jmeyers]

Ah, I honestly can't wait to see what their excuse for ignoring court order and attempt after attempt at getting it scheduled is.

[jmeyers]

Petition for Rule to Show cause

 

 

Attached Files

•  Petition-RuleToShowCause_Redacted.pdf   660.5KB   571 downloads

[jmeyers]

Our friends won't set a Administrative Hearing thats been court ordered but they have filed a Motion to Vacate the Order to Show Cause (invite to a hearing on contempt)

 

We'll see how this holds up tomorrow at 10am

Attached Files

•  PDF3376.PDF   182.21KB   272 downloads

[Burger]

We'll see how this holds up tomorrow at 10am

 

It is after 10am. Any update?

[jmeyers]

The Motion of Contempt was vacated unfortunately.  The judge has said he has the power to Order a REMAND but not to ORDER a REMAND by a certain date.  The state says due to budget constraints they have not had a ALJ but as of the July 22 do have a ALJ And Im near the top for a hearing

[kwc]

[GTX63]

I can draw a line in the sand but I can't do anything if you cross it. OMG.

 

Would it make any difference if you told the IRS and the court you haven't responded to their summons and court dates because you were a little tight on money?

 

The "rigged system"  mantra Trump keeps harping is not going to go away. It's ugly, frightening, intimidating and it's been here for a long time; now we are looking at it in the eye.

[jmeyers]

Coincidently I was told but the Judge that I need to stop traveling, save my money, Im not required to be at the hearings

 

With that said, I am stepping up my game and WILL BE present at every filing whether its a court appearance or a hearing from this point forward

 

There is a Rule to Show cause for the contempt set for Sept 21 if they haven't gotten a ALJ hearing scheduled.

[jmeyers]

This is moving forward.  Notice of Hearing has been filed before the court as well as served on myself that I have a hearing regarding the appeal on September 7, 2016 in front of the ALJ under the procedures/guideane of the Administrative Procedure Act (5ILCS 100/10 et.seq), The FCCA Procedures (20 Ill. Adm. Code 1210.10) and the IL FCCA (430 ILSC 66/1)

[Gamma]

are administrative hearings open to the public?

[jmeyers]

Based on the location, it is my impression that its not but I'm trying to find out

[kwc]

Best wishes tomorrow in the hearing!

[jmeyers]

Preparations today, hearing tomorrow.  Do i expect anything? Not at all, but it will be a interesting day to hopefully get a glimpse into the process for other users since I am the first to obtain a ALJ hearing.

[jmeyers]

Preparations are done. I am proud to be the first person to go before the Administrative Law judge to contest the actions of the Illinois State Police. Hearing starts in about 20 minutes and is expected to be 1-2 hours. Will post my experience of this journey once we are done.

See y'all on the other side!

[EnCrypt]

Preparations are done. I am proud to be the first person to go before the Administrative Law judge to contest the actions of the Illinois State Police. Hearing starts in about 20 minutes and is expected to be 1-2 hours. Will post my experience of this journey once we are done.

See y'all on the other side!

good luck! can't wait to hear the details.

[jmeyers]

So the cliff notes:

 

Hearing was approximately an hour and 30 minutes and we were in a conference room.  

Present were myself, my attorney, an attorney for ISP (not AG) and the Administrative Law Judge

 

It was conducted mostly like a trial, swearing of witness, Direct and Cross Examination.  ALJ asked some questions for clarification to myself as well as the attorneys.

 

Biggest thing I learned was the state is really reaching.  They attempted to not get "substantially similar" admitted citing it has nothing to do.  Also admitted that My Cancellation was really a revocation and they through the AG under the bus saying the term cancellation in circuit court was not meant to be said, and it should have been stated as revocation.

 

Once a transcript is available, it will be posted.  We now wait for the ALJ decision/recommendation.

[Gamma]

Why does this not surprise me that they came up with a story for the court previously, and now they have a whole new set of contradictory claims before the ALJ.

Biggest thing I learned was the state is really reaching. They attempted to not get "substantially similar" admitted citing it has nothing to do.

So what was their rationale then for revoking the license, or any of their treatment of non-residents based on?!?

Edited by Gamma, 07 September 2016 - 09:45 PM.