Jump to content

mab22

Members
  • Posts

    6,354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,931 profile views

mab22's Achievements

Member

Member (24/24)

  1. The Republican Super Majority is not like a Deamonrat super majority, the republicans are too chicken **** to upset democrats. Trump isn't, but the congress critters... 😞
  2. Thanks for sharing that. The part that concerns me is that congress REDUCED the tax to $0, they didn't eliminate the law. Just like with Barry Care, they reduced the tax to $0 for not buying insurance, but here we are still with Barry Care. Does this also mean that the bureaucrats in DC can figure out how to make it work by invoking the "constitutional commerce power" later on? This just seems to kick the can down the road for a future Iron Fisted Prez to tell the agency to figure it out and then it's back to court.
  3. This is what I was wondering, if the ATF stops enforcement the items then flood the market and become common, unless you live in a S hole state filled Marxist/socialist/America haters then they will ignore the court rules they don’t like.
  4. Never fails does it... Make up some hamburger and throw it out there.
  5. I think you need to verify your 143 Number for accuracy sake, you know how we require facts here….
  6. Poor kids will never get to play wind instruments under the California genuses. There go the wind chimes as well. Just wait until judge dread and his SWAT team go door to door demanding permits for wind chimes, plumbing components, etc. It use to be simple crack pipe, NOW it’s a barrel without a permit!
  7. But you still have IL PICA to contend with on the possession and registration aspect rite?
  8. But will the states comply or do they just get to make their own rules? (Also a coincidence that Illinois is trying to go after the firearm manufacturers just about the time this is coming out? ) (NAH!!!! It wasn't leaked to the 2A haters... ) https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/appeals-court-rules-federal-ban-on-interstate-handgun-sales-unconstitutional-6090944?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
  9. Pharmaceuticals are not in the constitution are they? Should the cell phones taking video of the teens going wild in the streets fall under the same rules? What about facebook, X, Instagram, etc. they are facilitating the YUTES organizing the meetups and it comes with a "social cost" and often violence and damage, so why don't they go after them as well. Hmm maybe they are expecting to loose some of the major gun cases pretty soon, and the democrat Marxist Socialist "overlords" don't like that?
  10. They will go for the toy guns next, they want to dissuade the youth from using them.
  11. Was the amicus written on parchment paper with a quill and an ink well, and delivered via a messenger on a horse? modern technology like phones and chat also is dangerous to children when they bully each other and can be done on a large scale. I can appreciate them not wanting people shooting each other like the gangs do, but there is also an evil that is behind a lot of that, I think. I would love to give them a tour of my area in the NW Cook county suburbs and they can see that there are more pot shops, gambling facilities, then there are any types of churches, synagogues, mosques, etc in the same radius, even by a 2x or 3x radius. Then it’s the poor ED U MUH CATION SYSTEM which probably isn’t helping either.
  12. Doesn't this case parallel the Gardner v Maryland case, which the SCOTUS declined cert?
  13. I really liked this this is awsome as well.
×
×
  • Create New...