mab22

All of my purchases have come back instantly, but I never get to leave with my purchase the same day. My point being is I’m tired of added waiting periods, additional hoops, for so called “conveniences”. Eventually the SCOTUS will come back and say you idiots keep giving them more and more of your rights so quit coming to us complaining.

And THEN there is the how long will they want the video of the transaction kept, what quality of video they demand 1080P or 4K? Then it's going to get stored and the government either feds, state or local will want it available 24x7x365 and they will want AI to be able to access it and then it will go so some company like FLOCK to track your image in some database that you the buyer didn't know about. ALL SO YOU CAN HAVE IT SHIPPED TO YOUR DOOR.... Yea! Lets give up more and more for a the ability to have it SHIPPED TO YOU like you could do 50 years ago from a catalog with FAR LESS intrusions then you had to back then. I will sit down now... 😠

How about I visit the FFL and do the paperwork and either I get it then, OR I can opt to have it shipped to me if it's something that needs to be ordered/shipped from somewhere. It would be "ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY" so I don't have to travel back to the FFL more then once which will save the planet. I prefer what I proposed as to waiting 7 freakin days just because some half wit politicians staffer or bureaucrat thinks it will make a difference, when not considering someone may need for a pending harm or immediate threat. We really need to stop accepting or doing "TRADE EZ" for an assumed benefit that can be made worse on a democrat whim. If you wait 7, 9, 10 days you can have it shipped to you if your local MDA group, police chief, fire chief, local PTA group, and mayor thinks it's okay. Just like the IL PICA Compliant rifle, the CA Compliant pistol, and on and on just so you can try and have the thing they banned.

Did any of the lawyers even bring up the Ceatano decision, not all attorneys know all the cases, you would think they would but they don't always know? Don't expect the judge or his staff to be on your side either.

That exactly why the states do it, drag it out as long as possible in the hopes the other side gets bored, tired of it, or runs out of money for attorneys.

What is the law under the ACT in question? If the signature is considered part of a Business transaction, I am not going to think to hard on this, the state law says it's legitimate. For reference, 815 ILCS 333/1

I have to ask, is this strictly limited to bring the case\suite as a 2A case, or can it be another constitutional protection that effects 2A, possibly indirectly but it is correlated to 2A?

FIFY.

Washington Gun Law had some interesting takeaways from Wilford V Lopez. Lots of clarifications for thing like Rahimi, Bruen, historical analogs, etc. Plus he uses a 1st amendment analog, suppose someone wearing a head scarf is not allowed into a place because of head scarf prohibitions....

And let us not forget the contortionist Roberts can always find a way to **** us in the end...

💯 As Sun Tsu said, To know your enemy, you must become your enemy. Personally I really don't think of them as an enemy, in America you have the right to be a dumb @55, unless your annoying me with it then I care.

Except the commie hoard has unethical lawyers on its side.

That which government gives permission by legislation, government may taketh away permission via legislation. Wasn't parts of the gun control act supposed to provide protections for citizens from state action but then the states didn't like that so the "congress fixed it for them" and screwed the citizens? ...Thank you sir may I have another!

totally legit because some party members are butt hurt over not getting reelected and wont do squat, and seek revenge on the people who told them to retire.. (cough!! CORNYN).