mab22

Pharmaceuticals are not in the constitution are they? Should the cell phones taking video of the teens going wild in the streets fall under the same rules? What about facebook, X, Instagram, etc. they are facilitating the YUTES organizing the meetups and it comes with a "social cost" and often violence and damage, so why don't they go after them as well. Hmm maybe they are expecting to loose some of the major gun cases pretty soon, and the democrat Marxist Socialist "overlords" don't like that?

They will go for the toy guns next, they want to dissuade the youth from using them.

Was the amicus written on parchment paper with a quill and an ink well, and delivered via a messenger on a horse? modern technology like phones and chat also is dangerous to children when they bully each other and can be done on a large scale. I can appreciate them not wanting people shooting each other like the gangs do, but there is also an evil that is behind a lot of that, I think. I would love to give them a tour of my area in the NW Cook county suburbs and they can see that there are more pot shops, gambling facilities, then there are any types of churches, synagogues, mosques, etc in the same radius, even by a 2x or 3x radius. Then it’s the poor ED U MUH CATION SYSTEM which probably isn’t helping either.

Doesn't this case parallel the Gardner v Maryland case, which the SCOTUS declined cert?

I really liked this this is awsome as well.

Looks like the case is gaining more attention, it made ZH and Epoch Times. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/federal-government-backs-supreme-court-challenge-to-ar-15-bans-6083943?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge

But will Illinoisistan overlords care what the ruling is?

Welcome to Illinoisistan and ChiRaq the 3rd world S holes of the midwest and the United States. Is this what Marxism and democrapic socialism look like?

Has anyone investigated these "anti gun groups", waiting to hear stories like the SPLC related to these groups. And I have to ask, if someone is violating the gun dealer rules/laws repeatedly wouldn't the ATF or FBI or some other agency have stepped in and shut these dealers down by now? Upon further inspection this data need to be combed through, example is someone FFL with warnings from the ATF upon an inspection. AND this org uses the statement on some places and I am surprised they are not sued for slander\libel\defamation in making those claims and statements. "Known High Crime Gun Dealer " And they define it here. https://gunstoretransparency.org/about-project#accordion-header-17

It's an interesting article, but they don't state how much money is actually spent by the state and local governments creating and then defending these laws. However, that is not to say it is NOT WORTH FINDING OUT. Who would we FOIA to see what PICA and the other lawsuits have cost the tax payers in the state of Illinoisistan thus far?

Surely exceptions like this have been brought up before or went to the courts already haven't they?

I think that's the disconnect, plenty of RED FLAGS being waived and warning signs being flashed, but it's "no no no it's all fine and good and a benefit" from the supporters. I suspect people seem to forgot years ago when Illinoisistan took aim at the FFL's and imposed all sorts of restrictions and there was a great gnashing of teeth as well as it's just the cost of doing business. If you look at the proposal and what's in it, strip out the shipping part, the "Istan" states and the democrats are licking their chops waiting to impose it at the state level and know it will be YEARS before it even makes it to the SCOTUS.

Umm pretty sure it was due to a waiting period. Which we have had in Illinoisistan for a while now....

All of my purchases have come back instantly, but I never get to leave with my purchase the same day. My point being is I’m tired of added waiting periods, additional hoops, for so called “conveniences”. Eventually the SCOTUS will come back and say you idiots keep giving them more and more of your rights so quit coming to us complaining.