davel501

Like I said, I'm sure there was a reason that a guy from Lake County got punched in the face at 3am in front of a Chicago dive bar and I doubt it was that the other guy was crazy.

I'm sure there was a reason. The story isn't about a man going on a punching spree.

You can keep it. You'll find out as you practice more that it's easier to take a pic with your phone.

Seems like a real guy at least.

I have to admit that it's kind of nice to be in a win-win position when it comes to firearms and the legal system. I'm still pretty sure they'll find a way to cheat.

Go read about how sheriffs work. Next, look at the map of sherrifs that support this. You can tell based on your location how easy it would be to arrest someone under the statute. This whole conversation has already been had a year or more ago. Not sure why you're trying to scare people now.

They can refuse to house them in their jail on the pica charges. There's some wiggle room in there if there are other charges too.

Exactly. They'll leave the stay in place.

But then the left wins because this stays in court forever while they happily enforce it.

Just send it to Doug: ATEi – Turning good guns into combat weapons systems (ateiguns.com)

Supreme Court likely to discard Chevron - SCOTUSblog

Right now the question is whether you sold the firearm for more than you paid for it. If you make money on the deal then you are a gun dealer.

Most of the lawyers I knew in college were political science majors.

Didn't the ISP technically provide the firearm to him? The FFL released the firearm to him at their direction.

It's really odd. One tab shows this: and another browser tab shows this: It worries me that I may have stumbled into A/B testing for what we are about to see as Illinois residents. Can't really blame them. I don't know that I would sell firearms into Illinois either right now.