DG53

Update … I’m no longer carrying my 43 with the shield arms mag. After testing, my 43’s slide would lock back with one round left in the magazine. I’m sending it back to shield arms for them to look at. I was hoping they would just exchange it for me but nope, they make it hard by insisting they test my mag and determine next steps. That’s annoying customer service. Especially for a return customer like me.

Rilo, If I didn’t already own 43, I would agree 100%. I don’t have the cash to go buy a 365, wish I did. I think there are lots of people in the same boat as me. Plus this is only when I need to carry something extra small. I usually can conceal a G19 and that’s what I prefer to have.

Agreed. Shield arms suggest you swap out the plastic mag release for a metal one. $60 gets you both the mag and mag release.

7/2/22: Update … I’m no longer carrying my 43 with the shield arms mag. After testing, my 43’s slide would lock back with one round left in the magazine. I’m sending it back to shield arms for them to look at. I was hoping they would just exchange it for me but nope, they make it hard by insisting they test my mag and determine next steps. That’s annoying customer service. Especially for a return customer like me. ********* Shield Arms, the same company that released 15 rounds magazines for the Glock 43x, just released a 9 round round magazine for the Glock 43. They achieve this with adding very little length to the group. My Glock 43 had been a safe queen since I was able carry my 43x with 15 rounds. But now with a 9+1 option I think my Glock 43 will be back in the rotation, especially in the summer. I ordered one of the magazines from shield arms and will run a couple 100 rounds before I start carrying it. The magazines I have bought from them for my Glock 43x have been flawless. Hopefully these will be too. https://shieldarms.com/z9-combo-pack-1

Deerfield decides to appeal the ruling. Wasting more of our tax payer $$. https://patch.com/illinois/deerfield/village-appeals-judges-ruling-striking-down-assault-weapons-ban?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_term=politics+%26+government&utm_campaign=autopost&utm_content=deerfield

So when are you going to march into the village hall and demand they return your AR? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk Residents did not have to surrender any weapons since there was an injunction before the law could take effect.

As a Deerfield resident I am so thankful to Daniel E., the ISRA, SAF, Guns Saves Lives and everyone else that led the fight. Think I will be opening my wallet a bit tonight to support those groups.

Really? YES!! Please share details.

It’s being reported by local news and other organizations. I believe it actually happened. Deerfield can appeal. http://www.isra.org/News/TabId/1068/ArtMID/4612/ArticleID/30463/Deerfield-Restraining-Order.aspx Just donated to SAF and ISRA. Thankful they are fighting for our rights. I know it is not permanent but still great news.

That’s good news if it is true! Who has a link to confirmation that this actually happened?

So you think the law will go into effect while it is battled out in court?

From the tribune: http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/deerfield/news/ct-dfr-gun-groups-seek-deerfield-restraining-order-tl-0607-story.html

"Looks like court events are synced among the 2 cases for restraining order? see status below..." I sure hope so. Guess we will know if a few days.

Has anyone heard any news about the lawsuits? I know there has been a ton of BS and gun grabbing going on in Springfield to pay attention to these past weeks. What is the chance that the implementation of the ban is delayed due to the lawsuits?

Looks like Deerfield has lined up the same attorneys that Highland Park used to defend their ban. Not shocking at all. Pro bono to boot. http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/deerfield/news/ct-dfr-assault-weapons-ban-legal-team-tl-0517-story.html