Barnett v. Raoul (3:23-cv-00209) (S.D. Ill. 2023) - NSSF Gun/Mag Ban

[MrTriple]

On 6/29/2023 at 9:57 AM, davel501 said:

Did the state just argue that the police at Uvalde were too scared to confront the shooter?

Yes

[djmarkla]

This court has already decided for the state.

I hope I am wrong,

 

[MrTriple]

Easterbrook (?) is attempting to relitigate the common use test by asking where that test comes from, where in history that statement originates.

[Monty80]

This panel is a joke. They have already decided how they're going to rule. Hopefully SCOTUS takes this up in the next session or the following session. 

[Sweeper13]

Erin Murphy is doing good, not backing down. 

[starwatcher]

Wow, these judges are woefully ignorant on current regulations. "Grenades might become common"

 

Yea after everyone gets a tax stamp for every grenade they own, in the few states that don't currently outlaw them.

[starwatcher]

Congress didn't ban the machine gun in 1938

 

I'm afraid that these judges are so ignorant to the laws.

[djmarkla]

Judge Easterbrook dose not want to listen to the plaintiff. He only wants to preach.

 

[chislinger]

This lawyer is horrible, she's not citing Caetano and not pointing out that "in common use" is not the sole criteria. Common use is just an example of arms that can't be banned.

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:21 PM by chislinger

[Sweeper13]

Hes going to spit a lung up. 

[starwatcher]

How are these judges arguing a SCOTUS decision?

 

This judge reference a dissenting opinion as an actual ruling of SCOTUS?

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:24 PM by starwatcher

[Sweeper13]

These 2 judges dont want Bruen to be used, they cut her off asap.

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:24 PM by Sweeper13

[dollarbilme]

So I can't have a 22LR Pistol (threaded barrel) because grenades are illegal? 🤡

[starwatcher]

You can ACQUIRE a M-16

 

This is pathetic, how can judges rule on 2nd amendment issues if they don't even know current laws.

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:27 PM by starwatcher

[Sweeper13]

Wow. The judge  has no issue with the law and filling out a registration form.

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:29 PM by Sweeper13

[djmarkla]

The Judge is saying if you don't like the infringement. don't vote for people like her

[starwatcher]

the fix is in

 

It'll need to go to SCOTUS.

 

 

This new guy knows the actual laws

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM by starwatcher

[djmarkla]

Judge Easterbrook thinks he is Justice Easterbrook.

[starwatcher]

a "more dangerous" goes to an interest balancing argument

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:37 PM by starwatcher

[Sweeper13]

Easterbrook got slapped with a stinger. He finally shut up...ahh

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:40 PM by Sweeper13

[djmarkla]

Finally, a mention that lawful use such as self defense 

[djmarkla]

Right of the People. Not Militia!

 

[starwatcher]

Stingers, bumpstocks, grenades, oh my

[djmarkla]

These judges would be arrested for reckless use of a firearm.

[chislinger]

My God Easterbrook is a moron. He thinks an elderly person would shoot better with a fully automatic rifle?

[Sweeper13]

Easterbrook is one strange bird. What does this have to do with Herrera. 

[yurimodin]

On 6/29/2023 at 10:46 AM, djmarkla said:

These judges would be arrested for reckless use of a firearm.

(D)'s don't get arrested, its (D)ifferent

[starwatcher]

I'd love to see some arthritic guy taken to a range and asked to shoot an automatic firearm.

 

I just hope the camera man is in a concrete bunker.

 

Easterbrook is a clown.

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:48 PM by starwatcher

[chislinger]

He really just said a homeowner can hit an intruder with an automatic weapon without aiming?

[Sweeper13]

Our side should have just walked up and said...Go head judges,what's your question. This is embarrassing to see how our side is getting slapped around trying to protect our rights and use Scotus decisions. 

Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:50 PM by Sweeper13