starwatcher

Who knew the government would require you to invoke your 5th amendment rights during a doctors visit. Even before this the medical industry has been weaponized against the population.

Its still going on, but it gets REALLY good when it's Notz turn to speak.

Should have put something in there about other jurisdictions might have gotten it wrong and those are separate cases with separate facts that have no relevance to this case.

Jesus, the first sentence is interest balancing.

Case starts at 2hr 00min

You can have your rights back, after you spend a wealthy sum to an attorney of your choice.

Just ignore him. If all he does is reaction videos, which is basically content theft. He's on the lowest spectrum of youtubers.

"...there was no threat to the community." That's a pretty bold statement when a gunman on the lose randomly killed 4 people.

I wish right wing states/courts would pass and challenge laws such as awbs. Have Texas make an awb that goes into effect in 100years, give a weak defense for challenges then keep appealing until it gets to SCOTUS.

Anyone else think these cases with very poor facts are being rammed through to attempt to chip away at Bruen.

Sounds like a 4th amendment case that will allow SCOTUS from having to rule on 2nd issues

I doubt any meaningful red flag law challenge will make it to SCOTUS within the lifetime of any of the current judges(or mine). If any sympathetic red flag recipient makes it to a significant legal challenge point the state will just moot the case by granting their rights back. The only way a challenge will make it's way up is if the plaintiff is a Rahimi type character. That Rahimi 2 character will have a hard time finding a champion.

Anyone smart enough reading the decision can tell how this will impact the legally gray FRT, Binary's, and Super Safety's?

If I'm understanding this correctly, bump stocks can be banned at the state level. Those bans then could only be challenged on 2nd amendment grounds. I anticipate more blue states passing bans. Anyone know which states already have bans on the books?

I'll giggle when I read McGlynn's decision using a quote from Sotomayor.