MrTriple Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:08 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:08 PM On 6/29/2023 at 9:57 AM, davel501 said: Did the state just argue that the police at Uvalde were too scared to confront the shooter? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:10 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:10 PM This court has already decided for the state. I hope I am wrong, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTriple Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:10 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:10 PM Easterbrook (?) is attempting to relitigate the common use test by asking where that test comes from, where in history that statement originates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty80 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:13 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:13 PM This panel is a joke. They have already decided how they're going to rule. Hopefully SCOTUS takes this up in the next session or the following session. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:16 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:16 PM Erin Murphy is doing good, not backing down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:17 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:17 PM Wow, these judges are woefully ignorant on current regulations. "Grenades might become common" Yea after everyone gets a tax stamp for every grenade they own, in the few states that don't currently outlaw them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:19 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:19 PM Congress didn't ban the machine gun in 1938 I'm afraid that these judges are so ignorant to the laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:20 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:20 PM Judge Easterbrook dose not want to listen to the plaintiff. He only wants to preach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:20 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:20 PM (edited) This lawyer is horrible, she's not citing Caetano and not pointing out that "in common use" is not the sole criteria. Common use is just an example of arms that can't be banned. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:21 PM by chislinger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:21 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:21 PM Hes going to spit a lung up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:22 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:22 PM (edited) How are these judges arguing a SCOTUS decision? This judge reference a dissenting opinion as an actual ruling of SCOTUS? Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:24 PM by starwatcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:22 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:22 PM (edited) These 2 judges dont want Bruen to be used, they cut her off asap. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:24 PM by Sweeper13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollarbilme Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:26 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:26 PM So I can't have a 22LR Pistol (threaded barrel) because grenades are illegal? 🤡 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:26 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:26 PM (edited) You can ACQUIRE a M-16 This is pathetic, how can judges rule on 2nd amendment issues if they don't even know current laws. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:27 PM by starwatcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:27 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:27 PM (edited) Wow. The judge has no issue with the law and filling out a registration form. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:29 PM by Sweeper13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:32 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:32 PM The Judge is saying if you don't like the infringement. don't vote for people like her Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM (edited) the fix is in It'll need to go to SCOTUS. This new guy knows the actual laws Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM by starwatcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:34 PM Judge Easterbrook thinks he is Justice Easterbrook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:36 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:36 PM (edited) a "more dangerous" goes to an interest balancing argument Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:37 PM by starwatcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:38 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:38 PM (edited) Easterbrook got slapped with a stinger. He finally shut up...ahh Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:40 PM by Sweeper13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:41 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:41 PM Finally, a mention that lawful use such as self defense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:42 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:42 PM Right of the People. Not Militia! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:44 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:44 PM Stingers, bumpstocks, grenades, oh my Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djmarkla Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM These judges would be arrested for reckless use of a firearm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM My God Easterbrook is a moron. He thinks an elderly person would shoot better with a fully automatic rifle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM Easterbrook is one strange bird. What does this have to do with Herrera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yurimodin Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:46 PM On 6/29/2023 at 10:46 AM, djmarkla said: These judges would be arrested for reckless use of a firearm. (D)'s don't get arrested, its (D)ifferent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starwatcher Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:47 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:47 PM (edited) I'd love to see some arthritic guy taken to a range and asked to shoot an automatic firearm. I just hope the camera man is in a concrete bunker. Easterbrook is a clown. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:48 PM by starwatcher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:48 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:48 PM He really just said a homeowner can hit an intruder with an automatic weapon without aiming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeper13 Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:50 PM Share Posted June 29, 2023 at 03:50 PM (edited) Our side should have just walked up and said...Go head judges,what's your question. This is embarrassing to see how our side is getting slapped around trying to protect our rights and use Scotus decisions. Edited June 29, 2023 at 03:50 PM by Sweeper13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now