davel501

There are quite a few towns where officers felt it prudent to spice up the drills by running around with air soft guns. They just did that for the faculty at the school my kids went to. The faculty made sure we heard their feelings about it on parent's night. It had been a few days and they were still all upset. I have heard of PDs doing it with kids in the building but don't know of any first-hand.

Well put. Here's a not too terribly long explanation of the Major Questions Doctrine: LSB10745 (congress.gov)

Sometimes mine scratch at the inside of the safe door, trying to get me to let them out. Mine are indoor guns though.

11/26: defendants request for extension due. There. Fixed it for you. 😁

Same.

Yep. They threw the book at him. Gave him 60 days in jail. Daley nephew Vanecko guilty in Koschman death, gets 60 days | The Killing of David Koschman (suntimes.com)

Can't believe it's finally here.

We all watch Mark Smith's videos. It's ok to directly answer a question.

If a weapon is in common use for self defense then the burden shifts to the state. It's the Bruen methodology. Sotomayor already conceded this point so I'm not sure why they're fighting it. Maybe to slow things down.

How would the court handle if 1000's filed at once?

I wish someone would raise these amicus briefs next time one of these states asks for an extension because they're too busy.

That's a great video. One of my favorites. This is great too

Technically, they could just say that to the arresting officer. Oh, you're taking the 5th? We can't try you. No point in arresting you.

"I had the right to remain silent but not the ability" - Tater Salad Here we're talking about your presence in court being incriminating. You can't invoke the 5th to avoid a trial.

I'm replying to Euler. I wasn't sure who you were replying to. Still not following the point you're trying to make.

Read it again lol. Rights prevent you from being compelled to do something.

If we keep going with this then the 5th Amendment prevents them from having to go to court since their presence would prove their guilt.

By height. The lawyer'n folk seem to prefer basing it on whether people are law abiding or not. You could argue that illegal aliens can still be crime victims that the law should protect. Even then, how do you know someone went missing that was never there?

No hyperbole. No moral outrage. It's just the fact of the matter. How do you separate good unknown unknowns from bad unknown unknowns?

They don't mention his age but allowing military age males that have snuck into your country to go about armed hasn't worked out any time it's been tried. From the Trojan Horse to Russia's little green men in Ukraine it's proven to be trouble.

It's a phrase that tends to be spoken by people who end up bankrupting their families and getting locked up with the very people they sought to protect themselves from.

Same.

This reminds me of when the marines tested ai. They had some sort of device that could detect humans and dared some marines to beat it. They got inside boxes to hide their human shape and went right up to the things. Suspect you'll see a lot of people getting robbed with McDonald's to go bags on the cta soon.

Weird. I carry one of these: