AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:21 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:21 PM Rep Wheeler is objecting to outstanding notes unanswered. 62-52 notes are considered inapplicable - just a formality. Willis is speaking to the bill stating loop holes tragedy blah blah Can I get a link to the video please? blue room link in Mauser's post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedbump Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:21 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:21 PM "Worked with both sides until we didn't want to anymore..." I may be paraphrasing.Translation: "Debate/ conversation" = dictating terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangerdeepv Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:22 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:22 PM When will the FOID case come up before the Ill Supreme Court to break it off in this person's...........never mind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:22 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:22 PM "A loophole that could be used, called a person to person transfer..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miztic Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:23 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:23 PM Someone please call her out on the lies!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:23 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:23 PM "they need to be safe if they need to do a revocation... so they need all the information they can get." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:24 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:24 PM Claims you have to have a fingerprinting to open a checking account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harley1955 Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:24 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:24 PM Nazi's....plain and simple.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILgunguy Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Is she seriously comparing mandatory fingerprinting to using your fingerprint to unlock your iPad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Claims that fingerprints are a one time thing, including CCL applications. "we are trying to make this as easy as possible." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt B Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM This is something special indeed Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harley1955 Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM When is the tattoo on my forearm coming??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:25 PM Claims that other states requires fingerprints, including Texas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Willis says finger prints are ok because Hawaiia says so. 5 minute timer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Rep Joyce Mason excused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:26 PM Mason is excused for the rest of the day, will be interested to see how she votes while not present.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:27 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:27 PM Wow. Willis actually tells the truth that this legislation predates the Aurora shooting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:28 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:28 PM Who is speaking? I didn't catch her name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:29 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:29 PM Rep Bryant is questioning Willis at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:30 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:30 PM Bryant states she was assured at the first meeting about this bill by Willis that Fingerprinting would not be a requirement. Willis backpedals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:31 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:31 PM The rep speaking is inferring that Willis broke verbal agreements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:31 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:31 PM Bryant states that at the 2nd meeting, gun-rights advocates and other opposition were excluded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangerdeepv Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:33 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:33 PM The rep speaking is inferring that Willis broke verbal agreements. An Illinois assembly person breaking verbal agreements on the dum0crap side? ...........that is the norm rather than the exception! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:33 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:33 PM Bryant claims that a phone call assured that Willis would not move the bill forward, speaking about HR0096... which was materially similar to this bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Bryant states that at the 2nd meeting, gun-rights advocates and other opposition were excluded.This is why you can not compromise with civilian disarmament advocates. They lie. We shouldn't be compromising. Sit in the meeting and say, "Anyone who votes in favor, we will work to unseat." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harley1955 Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM 400% increase...go get her.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Willis deflects the cost increases as "inflation adjustment since 1968 means today's card would be $38" and "math doesn't lie, I cannot argue with you about that." when confronted with the 400% increase. Is asked about any other consitutional rights that have costs associated with them. Willis compares to passports and "the right to travel". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:35 PM Willis says the Passprt is a right, and says "Right to Free Travel" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:36 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:36 PM Bryant states ISP has opposition about the 5 year change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upholder Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:36 PM Share Posted May 29, 2019 at 05:36 PM Willis claims the 5 year timeframe was chosen to line up with CCL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.