Guest YASLIFF Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:20 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:20 PM Chicago lawmaker: Downstate colleagues encourage crime Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:57 PM CDT By Kevin McDermottkevin.mcdermott@lee.net SPRINGFIELD -- The Illinois House erupted in an angry confrontation over regionalism and race Wednesday, after a legislator from Chicago accused downstate lawmakers of wanting to stoke urban crime to make sure rural prisons don’t close. “There are some people in the Illinois General Assembly who have prisons in their district, and their whole objective is to keep them filled,” Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago, alleged in a morning committee hearing. She was referring to several downstate lawmakers from prison districts who were opposing a bill that would make it easier for ex-convicts to get business loans. “‘We got to have those prisoners. They’ve got to come down here from Chicago,”‘ Davis said in the committee, summarizing what she alleged is the attitude of downstate legislators. “. . . ‘We no longer plant corn, we no longer have farms, we don’t raise cows and pigs, we keep prisoners.”’ She added: “They don’t want to stop crime because (that would stop) their livelihood. ... It is sad when your whole economy is based upon imprisonment of Americans.” The comments infuriated downstate lawmakers. “We want people to go to prisons because they committed crimes, not because we want to pump up the economy of Vandalia,” said Rep. Ron Stephens, R-Highland, whose district encompasses or is near state prisons at Hillsboro, Vandalia and Centralia. “That’s a criminal insult.” They also alleged Davis’ comments injected racial politics into the debate, something Davis vehemently denied. Davis is black, and Stephens and other downstate lawmakers from prison districts who debated her on the issue are white. Stephens and others angrily alleged that Davis brought “racial politics” into the committee hearing, and they demanded that House leaders review transcripts from the hearing and admonish her if the transcripts show what Stephens called “openly racial slurs” by Davis. Stephens claimed that Davis admonished downstate lawmakers for wanting to imprison “‘blacks from Chicago.”‘ Davis countered that she made absolutely no reference to race in the hearing. A Post-Dispatch review of an audiotape from the committee hearing found that neither account is entirely accurate. Davis didn’t reference the imprisonment of “blacks from Chicago,” according to the recording. She did mention race, however, saying: “African-Americans down here” meaning, in the Legislature “have got to fight harder” against what she alleged were downstate efforts to encourage inmate recidivism. A spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, said there would be a review of the transcript from the hearing. The bill that sparked the debate seeks to provide low-interest loans to ex-inmates so they can start businesses, funding the program with a new $15 monthly fee assessed on all paroled inmates. The program wouldn’t use tax money. The bill passed the committee on a 6-5 vote, and now goes to the full House. The bill is HB2746.article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappy353 Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:26 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:26 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBomb Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:28 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:28 PM As much as I would like to think the prisoners would do good things for a community after incarceration. My gut tells me their "busines loan" would fund a new meth lab. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol'Coach Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:28 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:28 PM Why, of course! That's the very reason we want gun control eliminated, isn't it? Get more guns in Chicago, more crimes committed, more convictions, more prison cells filled! Geez!!! :Angry!: :Angry!: :Angry!: :Angry!: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARKHOLSTRUM Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:53 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:53 PM thats a pretty low blow considering shicastro is the biggest grafter in the whole state Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneshot Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:56 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 02:56 PM talk about your tin foil hat theories (but hey, we've got to find some way to steal our revenue back from Chicago!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravyboy77 Posted July 17, 2008 at 03:30 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 03:30 PM I have a great idea. How about giving LAW ABIDING CITIZENS low interest loans instead of rewarding criminals? This is the same mentality these liberals have with the housing problems. Lets reward someone who bought a house they couldn't afford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hossua Posted July 17, 2008 at 05:23 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 05:23 PM As much as I would like to think the prisoners would do good things for a community after incarceration. My gut tells me their "busines loan" would fund a new meth lab.You are probably right unfortunately. But until they do that they don't deserve to go back to prison. If you can't make ends meet legitimately, you are gonna go right back to crime.It's a vicious cycle, once you are on the books you are screwed pretty much. I understand the reasoning behind all this, but it doesn't make much sense to me. I wonder what would happen if when criminals get out of jail they are considered "free" men once again. I would think parole would have to go bye bye for that to happen. I don't know how good an idea that would be for violent criminals, but for non-violent offenders I wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTIN Posted July 17, 2008 at 06:36 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 06:36 PM Well as long as they are paying for it and not the tax payer,why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyT Posted July 17, 2008 at 07:03 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 07:03 PM I wouldn't have a problem charging current inmates to subsidize loans for those who've been released...so long as they've been out without criminal involvement for X amount of time. But then again, prisoners should have to earn their keep anyway. Guess that's a different issue. The race politics really takes the cake...how absurd is the idea that those mean ol' downstaters are so racist they'd rather bring blacks from Chicago all the way down state to where they live instead of leaving them a couple hundred miles away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago guy Posted July 17, 2008 at 08:22 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 08:22 PM It's So embarrassing to be from Chicago. What a wonderfu, intelligent comment from an official elected from here! (Sure wish I could move.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdoom Posted July 17, 2008 at 11:38 PM Share Posted July 17, 2008 at 11:38 PM It's Monique Davi's fault for lying to her own district about 'effective' ways to reduce crime. If I were Mayor of Chicago, I'd have citizen Militias patrol the streets, open carrying whatever gun they wanted giving them shoot to kill orders if they encountered gangs. Maybe every city besides Chicago should secede and become part of Kentucky and Wisconsin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Posted July 18, 2008 at 12:09 AM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 12:09 AM Hey, I would be all for that. Make a new city in Lake Michigan, and have Chicago's government go out there and govern. Turn Chicago back to the people that can run a city without raping the rest of the state. I truly hate it that there are so many good people that live in the Northeastern corner of the state yet they are governed by the biggest idiots in the world. Daley needs to get a clue as to what he is doing and tell the citizens to take control of their own neighborhoods. The Cops can't or won't do it, the citizens are the only chance of getting the streets safe again. Mac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou Posted July 18, 2008 at 03:27 AM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 03:27 AM Davis once again proves tthe simple fact that votes have consequences. You get what you vote for. Want proof?DaleyStroegerBlowhardovich.Emil Jones.Moniques Davisetc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junglebob Posted July 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM Well as long as they are paying for it and not the tax payer,why not?I think the taxpayer would probably end up paying for it anyway. How do you collect from paroled exconvicts if they don't have a job? Administration of the program of course would take about 80% of the money collected, so they would have to go to the legislature for a subsidy. Getting those who have served their time to start legitamate businesses would be good if they had changed their ways. My pastor likes to point out that their were no prisons in the Bible, if you stole from someone you made restitution. Exodus 22:1-3 gives some examples "If a man steals an ox or a sheep and slaughters it or sells it, he shall restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep. If a thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so he dies, their shall be no guilt for his bloodshed. If the sun has risen on him, their shall be guilt for his bloodshed. He shall make full restitution, if he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft. If the theft is certainly found alive in his hand, whether an ox, or donkey, or sheep, he shall restore double. Biblical restoration from the thief was 2 to 5 times what was stolen. You see warrant for "castle doctrine" in the passage as well. You got your property back and then some, you weren't taxed to keep him in prison. Of course some crimes were capital offenses, something we don't have in Illinois now. The thief if he couldn't pay was sold and he worked off the debt for someone. They do still have chain gangs some places don't they? A former church of mine had a computer stolen when someone burglarized the church. They recovered the computer but it was kept for evidence and never returned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyldejackyl Posted July 18, 2008 at 04:20 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 04:20 PM If our state was run like things were in the Bible..how would we justify a massive waste of money on administration like everything in Hellinois? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol'Coach Posted July 18, 2008 at 05:02 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 05:02 PM If our state was run like things were in the Bible..how would we justify a massive waste of money on administration like everything in Hellinois? There wouldn't be a massive waste of money, so nothing to justify...."If pigs had wings..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashdump Posted July 18, 2008 at 06:22 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 06:22 PM Well as long as they are paying for it and not the tax payer,why not?. My pastor likes to point out that their were no prisons in the Bible I think I get the gist of what your minister is saying, but there were indeed prisons mentioned in the Bible, most notably in the New Testament. However, prisons at that time were used largely for persecution rather than prosecution. Having said that, even if you are not a Christian, IMHO, the Bible is an excelent source of wisdom and example of how societies should be! Lots of good stuff there! (The Founders knew this too) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWBH Posted July 18, 2008 at 07:01 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 07:01 PM Actually it's right on...There is a severe shortage of attorneys in S. Illinois. The plan is to fill the prisons to capacity, keeping them open so more criminals can get their law degree at OUR expense. This will re-staff all the counties down South with credible attorneys so more maniacs can get deferred or dismissed sentences... It's the heart of Daley's new "rehabilitation" program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len S Posted July 18, 2008 at 08:51 PM Share Posted July 18, 2008 at 08:51 PM Well guys you have to look at the positive side of all this. The more the race baiting chicago pols run off at the mouth the wider the division between chicago an d the rest of the state will be. Let them keep talking it helps us. Len Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBomb Posted July 19, 2008 at 05:44 AM Share Posted July 19, 2008 at 05:44 AM Let's not forget the last time religion and state intermixed, people were burned at the stake.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GarandFan Posted July 20, 2008 at 02:27 PM Share Posted July 20, 2008 at 02:27 PM Tsk tsk ... we are talking about statements from Monique Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTIN Posted July 21, 2008 at 12:15 AM Share Posted July 21, 2008 at 12:15 AM If our state was run like things were in the Bible..how would we justify a massive waste of money on administration like everything in Hellinois? Well I don't know about justifing things but as far as punishment is concerned,stoning comes to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdoom Posted July 24, 2008 at 12:16 AM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 12:16 AM The more society discourages personal belief, like praying silently at school for instance, the more violent society becomes. If one has nothing to believe in (be it atheism, Islam or Christianity) life becomes meaningless if one has nothing to believe in. This whole separation of Church of state argument liberals have is really an argument to abolish ALL beliefs from society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikew Posted July 24, 2008 at 04:35 AM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 04:35 AM [snip]This whole separation of Church of state argument liberals have is really an argument to abolish ALL beliefs from society.When I was kid, I had someone else's religious holidays shoved down my throat, in public school.Nice to feel like an outsider in your own country, when you're a child, no less. NOT. God speed the separation of Church and State. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted July 24, 2008 at 11:51 AM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 11:51 AM [snip]This whole separation of Church of state argument liberals have is really an argument to abolish ALL beliefs from society.When I was kid, I had someone else's religious holidays shoved down my throat, in public school.Nice to feel like an outsider in your own country, when you're a child, no less. NOT. God speed the separation of Church and State. Something funny that happened to me when I was in college was, I went to a Catholic college but a professor that I had a lot of classes with was Jewish so I'd get all the Jewish holidays off too because he would be at temple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashdump Posted July 24, 2008 at 03:34 PM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 03:34 PM [snip]This whole separation of Church of state argument liberals have is really an argument to abolish ALL beliefs from society.When I was kid, I had someone else's religious holidays shoved down my throat, in public school.Nice to feel like an outsider in your own country, when you're a child, no less. NOT. God speed the separation of Church and State. Sorry, Mike W. There's no such thing. This whole thing refers to a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a baptist convention. It basically states that the govt. has no business in the church. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ol'Coach Posted July 24, 2008 at 06:23 PM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 06:23 PM Back on topic?...if anyone can remember what it was??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len S Posted July 24, 2008 at 07:36 PM Share Posted July 24, 2008 at 07:36 PM Well Coach it was about some Chicago crat blaming the good people of southern Il for the ill behavior of her voters in order to keep prisons full. I would imagine she means GUNS. But since you cant have guns in the city I really do not know what she is talking about except for spewing forth a hate filled racist rant. If southern Il were to blame her constitutients for the sad state of the second amendment in Il then southern Il would be called red necked racists so I guess it should fit on her also. The more that the S--tcago pols keep spewing this hate filled and S--Tcgocentric rhetoric the bigger the divide between the SH-ty and the rest of the state will become. I look forward to the day when Soddom on the lake is isolated in the state legislature. Len Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.