-
Posts
5,882 -
Joined
-
Last visited
mab22's Achievements
Member (24/24)
-
This is disturbing! So someone at the state doesn't put the "information into LEADS" and you are going for a ride, processed, jailed, and facing felony charges despite valid FOID and CCL. The whole Illinois licensing thing appears broken, as you would expect in Illinoisistan and innocent people are getting charged with felonies. I would think the Democrat law makers in this state would be outraged at innocent people being jailed for following "the system", are they? What do Kim Jong Pritzker, Harmon, and Welch have to say "oops"? I wouldn't exactly call CBS a conservative outlet either... https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/black-gun-owners-chicago-felonies-foid-ccl/
-
10/13/2024 Mr.Mdigan goes to Prison! https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/mike-madigan-heads-to-prison-to-serve-sentence-on-corruption-charges-sources-say/3837678/
-
I think it’s going to be quiet until after the election. Gov Kim Jong Pritzker isn’t going to rock the boat much so he can get re-elected in 2026 and the state Marxist terrorists in charge will oblige because he wants to be the fattest POTUS. He has too many would be democrats p***** for all the support they are giving to illegals. Plus the more illegals that leave or get removed by ICE the less votes they have. Just one peasant’s thoughts….
-
This coming from a person, Fetterman (a Pensyl-tucky Ork), who chased down and held at gunpoint someone that was jogging in the neighborhood. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/fettermans-gun-incident-rattles-black-democrats-pa-senate-race-rcna25649
-
Minnesota Gov. Walz proposing special session focused on gun control
mab22 replied to EdDinIL's topic in National Politics
Why would he do it now, he's late to the party? -
Ruiz v Raoul - Non-resident 2A rights restoration
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
But that would be a permanent injunction to moot the case? -
Fooks v MD - Nonviolent misdemeanor prohibition
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
A person who runs a Red light or Stop sign is non law abiding person, but I don't think you loose your constitutional rights. Same can be said for speeding, not bringing up your garbage can by the specified time. So why not just strip a person of ALL of their constitutional rights, no right to court or jury just lock them up indefinitely? -
With a little bit more detail. https://www.foxnews.com/us/justice-department-sues-la-county-sheriff-over-concealed-carry-delays DOJ Statement. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/civil-rights-division-files-first-department-justice-affirmative-lawsuit-support-gun-owners Law suite PDF - https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1415706/dl
-
Illinois Considers Unusual Approach to Gun Regulations
mab22 replied to mauserme's topic in Illinois Politics
I would agree with that. It just furthers the argument that IL Democrats want a nullification of the federal constitution unless there is a clause they like, then it's "constitutional". My first concern is that the 2A groups will thrash it around as a 2A issue when there are other avenues which might be available. -
Illinois Considers Unusual Approach to Gun Regulations
mab22 replied to mauserme's topic in Illinois Politics
Pretty sure this would violate the commerce clause…. I suspect they feel a PICA loss coming. -
Nice so now they want to go after the “long guns”. I don’t think they are hiding anything, they think complete disarmament is the solution so the Marxists will have less actual resistance as they try to take over.
-
We have had 3 events recently and I am not hearing the gun control screeching like we normally do, or maybe I am missing it? We had the Church shooting in MN, Kirk assassination, detainees at a Dallas ICE facility. Yet I don’t hear the need for more gun control. Is it off the table now?
-
If the voice i hear is Easterbrook around 1:19 ish and at 1:45 ish there is a question about the 1 court making such a BROAD ruling, he is going to push to narrow the ruling to the named plaintiffs ONLY, Trump v Casa. So then what do the rest of us do, class action and start again and wait another year or two? Is Fatman and Kwama going to give up that easily or are they going to say the ruling ONLY applies to the named plaintiffs? My times are based off of this video.
-
How about even simpler, what happens to the 7th if the get overruled by SCOTUS? Smaller paychecks? No. Loss of employment?No. Loose their “district”? No. Get a bad review that year and don’t get the bonus or guaranteed salary increase due to COLA? NO. Look at the 9th, or the NY Judge that fined President Donald J. Trump a half Billion. He was celebrated! The left celebrates and praises them for taking a bold stance and 💩!
