mab22

Democrats unable to come up with their own original thoughts, unless it’s party line clap trap, appear to be enacting the Illinoisistan modern firearms ban. I don’t think they went full Retardant and called for a gun registry, yet. https://www.ammoland.com/2026/03/virginia-assault-firearms-ban-sb749-passes-legislature/ the bill. https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/SB749 https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2026/03/10/virginia-democrats-approve-assault-firearm-ban-n1231816 (where have we heard this before…. Kinda like “If you like firearms, you can keep your firearms.)

Scary to think that is WHY they fight tooth and nail to keep FOID around, makes it easier to keep citizens in line.

Maybe a better move would be to chip away at FOID. Example, attack FOID requirement for possession “in the home”, firearm, ammo, and accoutrements. I think there is some in LITH that recently got a personal SWAT demonstration over some ammo. Don’t know if there was anything else involved.

Equal protections clause?

Of 2027 or 2028? 😁

What country did this occur in?

I agree! After taking a defensive pistol course, part 1, it changed my perspective A TON! It’s one thing to pickup your firearm off the table at the range, use both hands, aim, fire, repeat. It’s a whole new ball of wax getting your hand on the firearm, drawing it from the holster, while defending with other hand, and quickly in a simulated “real” scenario. Then there is the don’t STAND there, move so YOUR a harder target to hit AND hit the target. It made me a proponent of open carry.

Wonder if it was similar to this SWAT scene form the Blues Brothers documentary? For a handful of random target ammo...

What exactly is a "wildlife" rifle and why can it only have 3 rounds of ammo with magazine and chamber combined? The "language" seems to be evolving...

Gotta get some use outta those SWAT outfits and an excuse to break out the gear!

I don't think you would have to move. WV could sell or transfer it to you, without being a resident. The language high lighted doesn't appear to limit it to "state residents", just like selling used state equipment at an auction.

This is an interesting concept. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/west-virginia-introduces-bill-sell-machine-guns-american-citizens We need more states making antis throw themselves on the floor and throwing tantrums.. Well, we at Gun Owners of America had a thought. What if the States wanted to sell machineguns to their citizens—that is, what if they were to engage in a “transfer ... by ... a State”? That certainly would comport with the historical tradition in the United States, where governments have sold military arms to the civilian populace since the Founding. And, of course, arming civilians with machineguns aligns with the prefatory clause of the Second Amendment, which reads: What could be a better and more of a “well regulated Militia” than a citizenry armed with machineguns? According to 922(o), a state government may lawfully “transfer”—that is, sell, give, loan, etc.—machineguns to ordinary citizens. And after the transfer is complete, those citizens may lawfully possess them, so long as the transfer was made by the State government.

Gun and owner registry? And we just thought Illinoisistan was violating that law. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/congress-suspects-atf-has-gun-registry-11-billion-records

Same way you forced into commerce with Obama care.

Has a question been presented or what IS the question?