-
Posts
5,794 -
Joined
-
Last visited
mab22's Achievements

Member (24/24)
-
How about even simpler, what happens to the 7th if the get overruled by SCOTUS? Smaller paychecks? No. Loss of employment?No. Loose their “district”? No. Get a bad review that year and don’t get the bonus or guaranteed salary increase due to COLA? NO. Look at the 9th, or the NY Judge that fined President Donald J. Trump a half Billion. He was celebrated! The left celebrates and praises them for taking a bold stance and 💩!
-
Justice Department Considering Ban on Trans People Owning Firearms
mab22 replied to mauserme's topic in National Politics
States like IL, CA, NY, just won't enforce it, they nullify the constitution and who is in charge of the laws when they want. It will be called it bigoted and get all the phoebes. If they do enforce it I can only imagine the backlash that is coming and how else they will make EVERYONE a prohibited possessor. You have red blood? Prohibited! The D party and the DSA wing of it look to certain groups to be their new militant wing, just like they had 60 to 90 years ago. -
Watching the video from Washington Gun law I find it ironic the they put this in the ruling. "The virtue of our federal system is that citizens who find themselves on the losing end of legislative disputes in their state may vote with their feet and move to a jurisdiction where their views have prevailed. " At the same time our dumb slob of a GUV, who could NOT have came up with this on his own, let alone the D party in Illinois, also made the similar comment about leaving the state if you don't like it here. Did the ruling get leaked and give them some catchy slogan to use? NO WAY that is a coincidence in this crap-a-licious state!
-
That is some Genuine grade A B.S! I will attempt to translate how I see it. Notice no mention of the "Constitution" or rights. They are a FOID holder. (So what, pandering!!) Guns are bad and hurt peoples. People think they needs guns for offense! People think they needs guns for self defense! They can just use their words for self defense. (No sense of reality, but that is a given IMO.) Quite the "Motherly" suggestion... Only peoples who want to shoot targets and hunt tiny game should be allowed to have them. Oh and for farms.... I shudder to think how they think guns are used on "livestock". 🤦♂️ And there is something about forced classes in there for government issued permission slips for "ownership" of "weaponry".
-
Know the Law, because Cook County Sheriff's Office doesn't
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Illinois Right to Keep and Carry
Was the person in question a resident of Illinois or Wisconsin? How is LEO supposed to determine residency with a vehicle with unregistered (or expired) Illinois plates, suspended Illinois DL, but he claims to be a Wisconsin resident and has a WI DL and CCL? -
Know the Law, because Cook County Sheriff's Office doesn't
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Illinois Right to Keep and Carry
I am going to go against the grain after reading this several times, and kicking it into AI. FIRST vehicle bought In January Then I would want to read the arrest report because we don’t know where he is ACTUALLY a resident of, and even if they are a Wisconsin resident your driving a vehicle in ILLINOIS with ILLINOIS PLATES that are not registered, AND you have a suspended Illinois license. AND you have a loaded firearm. There are enough red flags to question what’s going on. If he goes to court and proves Wisconsin residency then it’s over. OR was something stupid said like “I’m on my way home I live a few blocks from here”. Yet we got this Wisconsin ID. I think the sheriff errored on the side of caution given the red flags all over the field, plus there were more than 1 officers present. I just think we need more info before throwing LEO under the bus here. -
Know the Law, because Cook County Sheriff's Office doesn't
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Illinois Right to Keep and Carry
Because most people can't afford the defense, and they get scared they will get a worse deal if they don't. -
Bevis v Naperville - AWB
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
That’s because it’s OPM, Other Peoples Money. If their paychecks depended upon efficiency, like a regular business entity, that would matter, until then….”Good enough for government work.” (Look! the money fairy just keeps delivering) -
Bevis v Naperville - AWB
mab22 replied to Euler's topic in Judicial Second Amendment Case Discussion
They will get more extensions as Christmas is 7 days later, and New Years Eve is 14 days later, they just won't have the time to prepare with all the holiday stuff going on. They won't be able to get together until after Valentines day at the soonest as they have to have time to recover from the holiday backlogs. Your tax money hard at work... -
Is it safe to say that there never was a registry in the history of 2A, nor was there a “tax” for certain weapons? But then it’s up to the panel to decide the fate instead of the DOJ?