yurimodin

how about a lathe/mill combo

The last time America had all of its debt paid off too.

Its called not outing yourself to the registration NotC's

Its just one more thing to ignore if they screw us again. This entire government's legitimacy is hanging on by a single tattered thread anyway.

I will LMAO if Hunter is the guy that finally gets this stupid question off of the 4473

4473 in unconstitutional bunk anyway

I think its just institutionalism. Of the bureaucracy, by the bureaucracy, and for the bureaucracy shall not perish from this earth. Also remember these communist oath breakers don't actually believe in the constitution or bill of rights. (As seen by covid policy, treatment of J6 tourists, and the current Soviet show trial in NY). And for the few times they do care about the constitution its "living and breathing". Besides it was written by a bunch of rich white slave owners so we have to throw it all out for "muh equity". Who here remembers Capitol Fax Blog mental gymnastics after the passage of PICA because "The Bill of Rights were added later so this is OK". The next evolution of Rush's "Liberals are Liberals first" is "Communists are Communists first".

The way they are going SCOTUS will just be a ceremonial position like the British monarchy. Here I thought we had 4 branches of govt if you count agencies. Turns out we really only have 2 branches. The executive branch and the bureaucracy branch. Congress is the most worthless they have ever been and SCOTUS is the most nutless that they have ever been. Then again if you go back far enough SCOTUS let slavery, segregation, and even forced eugenics sterilizations stand so maybe infringing rights is just their jam.

Part of me thinks they just don't care. After 90+ years of unconstitutional infringements as long as they still get paid 200K+ and still live in their gated communities away from the problems of the peasant class (who can't be trusted with these weapons of war because we know better after all) then they are in absolutely no hurry.

They can technically do as much or as little as they want......it is called Supreme after all.

They don't even need a district split, they CAN butt in on an interlocutory basis but they seem to always decide not to for some unknown imaginary reasons?

It already has been found unconstitutional. If Bruen says you have the RIGHT to carry a handgun outside the home for self defense then it should go without saying that you have the RIGHT to own/carry one in your own home.

Total scum but the "law" is unconstitutional and she has the right to keep and bear.