vito Posted November 7, 2017 at 11:41 PM Share Posted November 7, 2017 at 11:41 PM If this passes, it would be prudent to stop attending church. God hears your prayers just as well even if offered from a shooting range rather than a house of worship. And stop financially supporting the church. That might get some minds changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicagoRonin70 Posted November 8, 2017 at 07:43 AM Share Posted November 8, 2017 at 07:43 AM Someone should send Morrison's office 10,000 separate photos of Mary Shepard and copies of the lawsuit that she filed, each in individual envelopes. That would be an an impossible to ignore message. As someone who pasted 500 first class stamps on each of the monthly newsletters of the DuPage County Grassroots (ISRA) organization last century, YIKES!!!! Maybe we could get a bulk rate? That's gonna be a chunk of change. I think there are professional businesses that do things like that. Or, you could put her office address on the return address and the Springfield statehouse on the mailing address, without stamps, then dump them in random mailboxes around the city, they would all find their way back to her office with "insufficient postage" endorsements. You know they would open them to see what is in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C0untZer0 Posted November 8, 2017 at 12:39 PM Share Posted November 8, 2017 at 12:39 PM The bill obviously does not make people safer, it makes them vulnerable and Morrison knows that. It is just an attempt to return Illinois to its former status where carrying a firearm outside of the home was illegal. She and her cohorts are trying to do it incrementally - one location category at a time. If someone proposed a bill that mandated the death penalty for anyone who murdered a person in a church or synagogue, Morrison would be the first to say that a bill like that wouldn't work because someone with murderous intent, heck bent on destruction doesn't care about the consequences since they plan to go out in a "blaze of glory" and take as many people as they can with them. Or she'd say that criminals don't even think far enough ahead to consider the consequences, they just impulsively act out their murderous rage. The anti-gunners are always the same politicians who are soft on real crime. They're always spouting "You can't just arrest your way out of this problem" when it pertains to street thugs, car jackers, burglars, robbers and rapists But she thinks she can convince voters that a few signs on a church door are going to protect people. She's really despicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plinkermostly Posted November 8, 2017 at 01:46 PM Share Posted November 8, 2017 at 01:46 PM What (in the name of logic) do 'those people' think that sign protects them from??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soylentgreen Posted November 8, 2017 at 01:54 PM Share Posted November 8, 2017 at 01:54 PM Those signs are bulletproof. No, seriously. They're magical talismans that deflect gunfire away from the building and anyone inside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANDY Posted November 8, 2017 at 03:48 PM Share Posted November 8, 2017 at 03:48 PM The only thing that would get their attention would be if we could sue our elected terrorist for passing laws that endanger the live of innocent people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neumann Posted November 9, 2017 at 03:16 PM Share Posted November 9, 2017 at 03:16 PM Churches as gun-free zones have certainly worked out well - Chicago, Milwaukee, Charleston, now Texas. You can't even bait deer for hunting, much less pen them in. I guess deer are more important than people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.