Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Beecher City
  • Interests
    Hunting, fishing, Working on lawnmowers

Recent Profile Visitors

523 profile views

RANDY's Achievements


Member (17/24)

  1. My gut feeling is they will remand to give the feds a chance to come up with a better argument. But if they come back with the same BS there goose is cooked.
  2. Sounds like the Government has already been told you loose and the plaintiff wins.
  3. From my time on active duty I can say with authority it is both. Some are flat out liars. and met more than one person that had a lower IQ than a box of BA1100
  4. I have come across several lawyers that say Bruen requires strict scrutiny. And if you bring up the THT, and mention Bruen disallows interest balancing they will argue THT is the same as strict scrutiny.
  5. I can't wait for most of the mental gymnastics they try to use to justify almost all of their claims to back up their gun control claims. And the funny thing is they will about be limited to the same defense in almost all court cases against them. Because public safety, legislative deferment, and judicial discretion are no longer on the table.
  6. I can see some per curium decisions coming down the pike. Basically instead of GVR and telling the lower courts to try again, and then end up with the same result. They just issue a per curium saying you are wrong and here is the right decision.
  7. True, but that was pre-Bruen.. So for all practical purposed that case is now debunk.
  8. Maryland's HQL is already being challenged, so it they win, that case starts laying the groundwork for other states licenses.
  9. It was GVR'ed 20-1507 ASSN. OF NJ RIFLE, ET AL. V. BRUCK, ATT'Y GEN. OF NJ, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
  10. Hearing rumors that West Virginia is asking Maryland for reciprocity and if they don't respond they will be filing against Maryland which will go straight to SCOTUS
  11. The whole thing read like a 5 year denying getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar. I think their strategy was to ride on the coat tail of prior rulings in Wilson and Friedman, but both of those cases were used intermediate scrutiny which basically gets invalided by Bruen,
  12. I am seeing hints that text, history, tradition is strict scrutiny, so they are thinking that narrowly tailored to obtain a certain goal is on the table. But the ruling reads like if it wasn't regulated in 1791 then you can't regulate it now.
  13. I agree with you @Flynn, SCOTUS is going to either grant cert, or basically tell the lower courts that is you send us a 2A case were are going to GVR it back for reconsideration. They will need to stop denying those cases and actually fix them. If they done that to previous cases that got denied we wouldn't be in this mess now.
  14. Basically the varying levels of Scrutiny are not to be considered in 2A matters.. IE, ends mean scrutiny was rejected in the ruling. The SCOTUS claims they didn't use scrutiny in their ruling in Heller and the courts can't read because we said we didn't use scrutiny in Heller but you didn't listen so we had to spell it out for you.
  • Create New...