Please note a new change in forum policy regarding "National Politics." In order to help keep the forum focused on its primary objective - advancing the Second Amendment in the United States and gaining legal recognition of the right-to-carry in Illinois, topics in "National Politics" should be dedicated to subject matter directly related to the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Discussion of other current events and national topics should take place in the Back Room.
The "National Politics" guidelines in the sticky thread titled "New Forum" have been adjusted to reflect this.
This decision is not the result of any particular individual or any breaches in the forum rules; it simply reflects the fact that the way "National Politics" was organized previously was inefficient and needlessly distracting.
|
|
READ THIS BEFORE POSTING NEW TOPIC: National Politics v. Back Room
Started by
SmershAgent
, Mar 23 2010 01:17 PM
8 replies to this topic
#1
-
- Members
-
- 4,376 posts Joined: 29-August 04
Member
Posted 23 March 2010 - 01:17 PM
My right to own a gun protects your right to tell me I can't
#2
-
- Members
-
- 9,434 posts Joined: 29-March 07
Member
Posted 23 March 2010 - 09:42 PM
Then I presume that discussions of current events and topics at the state level should also take place in the Back Room, rather than Illinois Politics, is that correct?
#3
-
- Members
-
- 6,809 posts Joined: 29-March 09
Member
Posted 24 March 2010 - 08:48 AM
have you guys thought about a dedicated forum to court cases?
While a 9 mm or .40 caliber bullet may or may not expand, it is an undeniable fact that a .45 caliber bullet will never shrink.
my posts are moderated due to some butthurt on the part of IC people not liking my comments at times
my posts are moderated due to some butthurt on the part of IC people not liking my comments at times
#4
-
- Members
-
- 1,902 posts Joined: 14-April 09
Member
Posted 24 March 2010 - 10:49 AM
Would it be possible or agreeable to rename "National Politics" to something like "National Firearm Politics"? or "National Second Amendment Politics" Same for the state level?
Maybe add to the "Backroom" - something like "Backroom:General Politics"
Just throwing ideas out there.
Maybe add to the "Backroom" - something like "Backroom:General Politics"
Just throwing ideas out there.
That an individual right exists requires that certain policy positions be removed from the table of debate.
I write, therefore I am.
"It's not your business model that sucks, it's you that sucks." - Andrew Breitbart referring to the Mainstream Media.
I write, therefore I am.
"It's not your business model that sucks, it's you that sucks." - Andrew Breitbart referring to the Mainstream Media.
#5
-
- Members
-
- 69 posts Joined: 07-August 11
Member
Posted 24 April 2013 - 07:37 AM
have you guys thought about a dedicated forum to court cases?
#6
-
- Members
-
- 69 posts Joined: 07-August 11
Member
Posted 24 April 2013 - 07:38 AM
Great idea. Would make searching details more efficient.
#7
-
- Members
-
- 1,189 posts Joined: 16-July 07
Member
Posted 24 April 2013 - 07:51 AM
Great idea. Would make searching details more efficient.
We have this already
http://illinoiscarry...hp?showforum=21
#8
-
- Admin
-
- 21,475 posts Joined: 20-February 09
Eliminating the element of surprise one bill at a time.
Posted 24 April 2013 - 08:04 AM
The thread was nicely bumped, though, and still relevant after all these years.
Link to ILGA House Audio/Video..........Link to ILGA Senate Audio/Video ..........Advanced Digital Media Link ..........Blue Room Stream Link
RFM 3/7 Kilo Co.
;IGY6
#9
-
- Members
-
- 9,346 posts Joined: 03-January 07
David Lawson
Posted 08 October 2013 - 11:21 AM
Seems like another bump is called for.
--George OrwellPeople sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men [and women] stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
-- Certified something-or-other by various organizations and governmental entities.
