45superman Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:00 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:00 AM Hadn't noticed this before: ICHV Comment: It is problematic to have some gun sales that are subject to background checks and some that are not subject to background checks. This issue is most prevalent in relation to gun shows, where there is a mixture of both licensed and non-licensed gun sellers. The non-licensed sellers are not required to perform criminal background checks on gun purchasers, and are therefore much more attractive to criminals and ex-felons seeking an easy way to buy firearms and accessories while skirting a background check. That has not been the case since SB 1333 went into effect in 2005.
Lou Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:02 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:02 AM Hadn't noticed this before: ICHV Comment: It is problematic to have some gun sales that are subject to background checks and some that are not subject to background checks. This issue is most prevalent in relation to gun shows, where there is a mixture of both licensed and non-licensed gun sellers. The non-licensed sellers are not required to perform criminal background checks on gun purchasers, and are therefore much more attractive to criminals and ex-felons seeking an easy way to buy firearms and accessories while skirting a background check. That has not been the case since SB 1333 went into effect in 2005. They never get called on it by the media so they can get away with being the lying scum that they are. :Angry!:
Drylok Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:04 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:04 AM Once again letting their emotion get in the way of their facts....I have never been to a gun show, DU banquet what have you where there isn't a waiting period and background check on any guns bought or won.
ilphil Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:25 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:25 AM Those losers at ICHV wouldn't recognize the truth if it jumped up right in front of them.
45superman Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:30 AM Author Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:30 AM Those losers at ICHV wouldn't recognize the truth if it jumped up right in front of them. I'm not so sure--are they unaware of the truth, or have they consciously concluded that the truth doesn't serve their purposes as well as prevarication does?
ilphil Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:39 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:39 AM Those losers at ICHV wouldn't recognize the truth if it jumped up right in front of them. I'm not so sure--are they unaware of the truth, or have they consciously concluded that the truth doesn't serve their purposes as well as prevarication does? In this age of relativism, I think they feel that the truth is whatever they perceive it to be.
Ocellairs Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:49 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:49 AM Hadn't noticed this before: ICHV Comment: It is problematic to have some gun sales that are subject to background checks and some that are not subject to background checks. This issue is most prevalent in relation to gun shows, where there is a mixture of both licensed and non-licensed gun sellers. The non-licensed sellers are not required to perform criminal background checks on gun purchasers, and are therefore much more attractive to criminals and ex-felons seeking an easy way to buy firearms and accessories while skirting a background check. That has not been the case since SB 1333 went into effect in 2005. The last time they modifed that page was on...... Friday, January 18, 2008 4:42:21 PM
ishmo Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:53 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 12:53 AM Those losers at ICHV wouldn't recognize the truth if it jumped up right in front of them. I'm not so sure--are they unaware of the truth, or have they consciously concluded that the truth doesn't serve their purposes as well as prevarication does?A lie is still a lie 45 whether we call it prevarication or equivocation. They know the truth and I think it's starting to dawn on them that the tide may be turning. What we need to keep working on is getting our side of the story out.
SmershAgent Posted April 15, 2008 at 02:03 AM Posted April 15, 2008 at 02:03 AM They're too busy soliciting money to bother updating their website to reflect reality.
papabear47 Posted April 15, 2008 at 10:45 PM Posted April 15, 2008 at 10:45 PM "Accessories"? you have to perform a background check for a set of grips or a rifle sling????
45superman Posted April 15, 2008 at 10:46 PM Author Posted April 15, 2008 at 10:46 PM "Accessories"? you have to perform a background check for a set of grips or a rifle sling????Good Lord--I hadn't even noticed that--these people are LOONS.
dorvinion Posted April 16, 2008 at 02:36 AM Posted April 16, 2008 at 02:36 AM That has not been the case since SB 1333 went into effect in 2005. I'd say technically, that hasn't been the case since the FOID.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.