Yas Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:51 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:51 AM Heads up: Discovered this @ The war on guns is reporting this evening. Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, attorneys for the city and other stakeholders will brief the media on McDonald v. Chicago in advance of oral arguments before the Supreme Court early next month. They will be joined by others with a direct stake in the outcome of the case: mayors, prosecutors, law enforcement officials, medical professionals and the families of gun violence victims.The event will be held on Tuesday, February 23, at 3:00 p.m. in the Broadcast Center Main Studio on the fourth floor of the National Press Club. A conference line is available for those who wish to call in – NOTE NEW NUMBER: 1-888-438-5453, pass code 1048285.Much more @: My link
abolt243 Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:55 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:55 AM Heads up: Discovered this @ The war on guns is reporting this evening. Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, attorneys for the city and other stakeholders will brief the media on McDonald v. Chicago in advance of oral arguments before the Supreme Court early next month. They will be joined by others with a direct stake in the outcome of the case: mayors, prosecutors, law enforcement officials, medical professionals and the families of gun violence victims.The event will be held on Tuesday, February 23, at 3:00 p.m. in the Broadcast Center Main Studio on the fourth floor of the National Press Club. A conference line is available for those who wish to call in – NOTE NEW NUMBER: 1-888-438-5453, pass code 1048285.Much more @: http://www.earthtime...o-mayor-richard,1174217.shtml The link doesn't work. Anybody catch this or see any report on it?????
pyre400 Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:57 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:57 AM Sounds like a party worth crashing.
PPK Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:58 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 01:58 AM This case marks the first time the Supreme Court will consider a challenge to gun violence prevention laws since its ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)What gun violence prevention law are they talking about?
Yas Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:00 AM Author Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:00 AM Nuts its today.... I'm having a bad case of the mondays Tuesdays
PPK Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:05 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:05 AM The link worked for me on the second try. You get it yet?
Yas Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:07 AM Author Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:07 AM The link worked for me on the second try. You get it yet? Sorry I did reedit link to get it to work it should be Golden now
abolt243 Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:10 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:10 AM This case marks the first time the Supreme Court will consider a challenge to gun violence prevention laws since its ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)What gun violence prevention law are they talking about? Spin baby, Spin!!!!
Buzzard Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:50 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:50 AM This case marks the first time the Supreme Court will consider a challenge to gun violence prevention laws since its ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)What gun violence prevention law are they talking about? Spin baby, Spin!!!! Expecting somethin' else??
1957Human Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:50 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 02:50 AM Today's pop quiz Question: Which is a defendant accused of illegal conduct in a case accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court: A. prosecutorsB. law enforcement officialsC. medical professionalsD. crime victimsE. mayors of other cities Answer: The guy hiding behind the above contestants.
Howard Roark Posted February 24, 2010 at 03:25 AM Posted February 24, 2010 at 03:25 AM Today's pop quiz Question: Which is a defendant accused of illegal conduct in a case accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court: A. prosecutorsB. law enforcement officialsC. medical professionalsD. crime victimsE. mayors of other cities Answer: The guy hiding behind the above contestants. And who would that be (which case) ? And where can I find the audio/video/transcript hysterics and hand-wringing and apoplexy of Mayor wazzhisname and LCAV in the so-called press-conference of today?
1957Human Posted February 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM Posted February 24, 2010 at 12:47 PM Today's pop quiz Question: Which is a defendant accused of illegal conduct in a case accepted by the U.S. Supreme Court: A. prosecutorsB. law enforcement officialsC. medical professionalsD. crime victimsE. mayors of other cities Answer: The guy hiding behind the above contestants. And who would that be (which case) ?And where can I find the audio/video/transcript hysterics and hand-wringing and apoplexy of Mayor wazzhisname and LCAV in the so-called press-conference of today? See any of the other "stakeholders" listed here?
Lou Posted February 24, 2010 at 03:48 PM Posted February 24, 2010 at 03:48 PM Heads up: Discovered this @ The war on guns is reporting this evening. Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, attorneys for the city and other stakeholders will brief the media on McDonald v. Chicago in advance of oral arguments before the Supreme Court early next month. They will be joined by others with a direct stake in the outcome of the case: mayors, prosecutors, law enforcement officials, medical professionals and the families of gun violence victims.The event will be held on Tuesday, February 23, at 3:00 p.m. in the Broadcast Center Main Studio on the fourth floor of the National Press Club. A conference line is available for those who wish to call in – NOTE NEW NUMBER: 1-888-438-5453, pass code 1048285.Much more @: My link They covered it on the news last night. Mostly showed the mother of Blair Holt and I don't remember Daley getting on TV.
GarandFan Posted February 24, 2010 at 04:46 PM Posted February 24, 2010 at 04:46 PM They covered it on the news last night. Mostly showed the mother of Blair Holt and I don't remember Daley getting on TV. Seems that the parents of Blair Holt is the best that Daley can do. I'm certainly sad that Blair was killed ... but it sure as heck wasn't a gun's fault. It seems fewer and fewer people are willing to fall for that kind of bait-and-switch. But as long as Daley thinks it's effecive, more power to him. Perhaps the only thing better than a weak enemy is a stupid one.
Yas Posted February 24, 2010 at 07:30 PM Author Posted February 24, 2010 at 07:30 PM War on guns comment section Note details first comment @ the war on guns The author of this press release is "Legal Community Against Violence". Contacts at the bottom include cboesel@joycefdn.org -- that would be that ever-vigilant defender of citizen sovereignty, the Joyce Foundation, right? The other contact is mglaze@rabengroup.com. The Raben Group "combines 'inside the Beltway' experience, insight and access with outside-the-box thinking for clients in the corporate, public and governmental sectors." They appear to be a general purpose lobbying group, with clients ranging from the, yes, Mayors Against Illegal Guns Action Fund, to the ACLU, to General Electric, Time Warner Cable, and United Auto Workers. Ooh, look, they do astroturfing: "Whether you need an issue campaign, a coalition or a marketing strategy, a creative grassroots or grasstops campaign, political research and counsel or all of these, The Raben Group’s professionals provide innovative, outside-the-box counsel to achieve your goals."
drdoom Posted February 24, 2010 at 09:16 PM Posted February 24, 2010 at 09:16 PM Let the record show on this website, that in the year of our lord, two-thousand and ten on february the twenty-third, was Daley's last stand
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.