Winnebago county online Petition
#2
Posted 06 June 2008 - 01:51 PM
#3
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:01 PM
#4
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:02 PM
abolt243
#5
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:15 PM
#6
Posted 06 June 2008 - 02:30 PM
http://www.themonroe...910&TM=55539.79
Please send Tere a THANK YOU after you read the editorial. She will also be attending the meeting on June 10th.
Fred Wescott
#7
Posted 06 June 2008 - 03:31 PM
abolt243
#8
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:02 PM
#9
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:32 PM
#10
Posted 06 June 2008 - 05:12 PM
If some of our replies (I'm guessing im not the only one to reply) get posted, then we can stop talking to that idiot and get back to the positive pro-rights view
Here's my reply:
Quote
"Regulated" as used at the time of the Bill of Rights meant "disciplined" or "trained." So "well regulated" means "well disciplined" or "well trained." Regulated did not mean restricted as we use the term today.
Most importantly, even if the Second Amendment was entirely absent from the Constitution, it doesn't matter at all. The Ninth (9th) Amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." I will explain this, since you probably do not understand. This means that the LISTING of rights should never been used to suggest or argue that other rights do not exist. You see, our inherent, inate, God-given, unalienable rights are so many that they may not be listed at all. The founding fathers only sought to protect some of those rights which they felt were some of the most basic, fundamental, and necessary rights. Anytime you or other ignoramouses try to argue that the Second Amendment doesn't mean what it says, you are also ignoring the Ninth Amendment entirely.
Originally, it was required that a natural human being file a complaint against another for their to be an alleged crime. Nowadays the "state" has taken the place of the plaintiff, and seeks damages itself. We have endless lists of victimless crimes -- that is prohibited actions (prohibition...just like early 20th century), which punish behavior that does not injur others.
We already have laws that outlaw crime. Murder, rape, robbery, and everything else. Unfortunately, no matter how "strict" we make these laws, or how "harsh" the punishment, criminals still disobey the laws. No matter how high the stack of laws gets, criminals still disregard each and every one. Criminals, who by definition are those who violate the rights of others and cause injury, are willing to break the moral laws of humanity -- laws which none of us argue over. Do you honestly think they pay attention at all to administrative laws prohibiting carrying guns or any other type of weapon? Should we create a new law to make it illegal to press a trigger and shoot someone? Perhaps it should be illegal to stare at a woman's purse because, afterall, you may be planning on grabbing it?
Stop it with the nonsense, ignorance, and foolishness. We have decades of imperical data to prove that restrictive gun laws actually serve to encourage crime, while non-restrictive gun laws reduce crime.
Countries like Great Britain have much higher violent crime rates and all types of crime rates than the United States. Even Canada is catching up. Countries like Australia who have banned the ownership of guns have seen remarkable increases in burglary, robbery, rape, and, ironically, "gun crime." More murders and lawlessly is committed with guns by the same sector of the population (criminals) as ever! Now the criminals know that only police can stop them!
Either sign your name to your post, or go away. No one is buying what you're selling. You would do yourself well to educate yourself too. www.gunfacts.info is a good start. But you can find the FACTS of this matter all over the place.
#11
Posted 06 June 2008 - 10:33 PM
#12
Posted 07 June 2008 - 06:35 AM
#13
Posted 07 June 2008 - 11:32 AM
I replied. We'll see if it gets posted or not.
If some of our replies (I'm guessing im not the only one to reply) get posted, then we can stop talking to that idiot and get back to the positive pro-rights view
Oh, for cripes sake, that "Wondering" bozoid is ranting again. Some people just won't learn, because they're just too damn stupid to face facts and deny those facts when presented to them.
#14
Posted 07 June 2008 - 12:22 PM
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
#15
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:07 PM
ewellnitz, on Jun 7 2008, 01:22 PM, said:
Remember the 1991 Luby Cafeteria Massacre of the Unarmed (Kileen, Texas before Texas Concealed Carry) Do we need 23 people to die in a similar incident before we're allowed effective self defense?
Three school masacres have been stopped by civilians with firearms. Two with handguns and the third by a guy with a shotgun. (Pearl, Ms; Appalacian School of Law; Edinboro,Pa)
#16
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:23 PM
Quote
Regardless of the statistics regarding concealed carry, gun control, and violent crime, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects an individual right to KEEP and BEAR arms. Arms means guns, keep means own, and bear means carry. Find me a dictionary that disagrees with those definitions. Even if there was no Second Amendment, people would still have the right to defend themselves, their families, their property, and their rights. No government or government agency has the power to tell people that they cannot defend themselves. In today's world, the only true guarantee for self-defense, is a gun is the hands of a citizen that knows how to use it. When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Doesn't matter what the press says. Doesn't matter what the politicians or the mobs say. Doesn't matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right. This nation was founded on one principle above all else: the requirement that we stand up for what we believe, no matter the odds or the consequences. When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the whole world - "No, you move." - Captain America
#17
Posted 08 June 2008 - 11:17 AM
CAP...Conceal And Protect
#18
Posted 08 June 2008 - 11:55 AM
Board9, on Jun 8 2008, 12:17 PM, said:
CAP...Conceal And Protect
Thank You and God bless you, Fred! I am sure the Founders would be proud of you. Lord knows there is little they would recognize in America today, but this is definately a step in the right direction!
"Though they plot evil against you and devise wicked schemes, they cannot succeed; for you will make them turn their backs when you aim at them with drawn bow." -- Book of Psalms, Ch. 21 Vs. 11 & 12
"Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
— Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857
#19
Posted 08 June 2008 - 12:12 PM
Ashdump, on Jun 8 2008, 12:55 PM, said:
Board9, on Jun 8 2008, 12:17 PM, said:
CAP...Conceal And Protect
Thank You and God bless you, Fred! I am sure the Founders would be proud of you. Lord knows there is little they would recognize in America today, but this is definately a step in the right direction!
I cannot be more honored and humbled. Together we can ALL accomplish great things.
#20
Posted 08 June 2008 - 04:22 PM
I've spent a lot of time on the net, and I've been involved in quite a few pro-rights vs. pro-hibition
Anyhow, so don't get too worried about these bafoons. They are either part of a very small minority of ignorant people (usually not too harmful) or paid lackies with no lives who post lies on the net
The only downside to using your name on the net is that if you run into enemies, they can impersonate you to try to hurt your reputation (character assassination). This happened to me before when unknown paid jerkoffs used my name and even registered a gmail account that was my name and used it to post bull**** having to do with "white supremacy" or other hate/bigotry related trash. Luckily even these types of attacks are only minimally effective, as it's easy for people to look at MY websites and read my REAL postings to see that that other stuff was not me. It still stings a bit, however, and can be a nuisance sometimes. Anyways, I'm going off on a tangent here, but I just wanted to reiterate that these people ARE really out there. Usually they won't do to you what they did to me (it happened to me because I associated myself with one of their favorite people to character assassinate), and the majority of them are harmless except of course for the lies they spew all over.
"Stick to your guns" and you'll be fine
#21
Posted 08 June 2008 - 04:26 PM
junglebob, on Jun 7 2008, 02:07 PM, said:
ewellnitz, on Jun 7 2008, 01:22 PM, said:
The areas around Madison are similar to those around Chicago - the anti-gun movement gets weaker the farther you get from there.
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
#22
Posted 08 June 2008 - 05:03 PM
#23
Posted 11 June 2008 - 07:44 AM
#25
Posted 14 June 2008 - 11:07 AM
#27
Posted 14 June 2008 - 03:23 PM
#28
Posted 14 June 2008 - 04:24 PM
HighHeeledGoddess, on Jun 14 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
I thought that was Milwaukee...
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
#30
Posted 14 June 2008 - 06:20 PM
polhms1, on Jun 14 2008, 07:20 PM, said:
You learn something new every day...
Illinoiscarry Document Repository
Thanks to everyone who has contributed! Lets keep em coming!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











