20 replies to this topic

[chidiver]

So we're down to Madigan's bill and Raoul's bill in the Senate with Madigan making a pretty bold power play against Cullerton, Quinn and Rahm. What will the next couple of days bring (besides bigger holes in both my stomach and liquor cabinet)?  Because the powerplay aspect of this is pretty huge and I think the political theater is FAR from over.  

1. Madigan's play works as scripted..Raoul guts Madigan bill-fails, Senate passes Maddy's bill. Quinn weeps over the ruin of his career.

2. Here's a fun question..don't you think the political gun grabbers would prefer the original 997 (as is..no changes/"fixes") to the current bill?  They retain power, beat Madigan at his own game, keep silly homerule registration/tax laws (for now!) BUT make downstate happy with real, statewide shall-issue carry. Madigan's bill is interesting..it isn't a big CC victory for us, but it IS a crushing political defeat for the gun grabbers. I think this might be the politically brilliant countermove against Madigan and its the lesser of two evils from their power-wielding point of view.  Unfortunately, I don't think they can put their gun grabbiness and NRA hatred aside for this interesting play and would try to "fix" the bill..thereby dooming it (and Madigan knows this).

3. What's the wildcard play? Pensions? Casinos? Does Madigan screw us on carry somehow at the 11th hour? I don't think so since he played this pretty openly and any give on his part would=weakness, but who knows?

Should be interesting.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[03rev]

It will still have to pass a vote in the house. I think madigan has proven his that will go.

[Trevis]

I think this 'victory" wil; likely have a lot of hidden cost, politically and financially. That's the illinois way.

[chidiver]

Well maybe I should pose the hypothetical this way...If Raoul were to amend his bill to be the exact text of 997 with no edits, which would you support and why?

"It'll never happen" is correct, but no fun..so its not allowed as an answer. I have a feeling this will breakdown as Chicago residents preferring the current bill and everyone else preferring 997.

What would happen in the House? Divide and conquer indeed!

Now where's my Tums?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[KarlJ]

I don't know that I'd call it a power play.  I think it's just common sense.
Look at the numbers on may vs. shall. Madigan himself even pointed it out.  He even goes on to say that after the arm twisting they still had over 60 votes for shall issue.
It's simple math and madigan is just being realistic on a serious matter. There isn't enough votes for may issue.
So if we're going to have shall issue than it has to preempt home rule.  Again, that's just using common sense. Illinois can't pass a law for its citizens and expect us to have to potentially follow up to 220 variations of the law.
We're going to have shall issue with preemption or were not going to have a law.
The powers that be are not going to let concealed carry go with no law so it looks like they only have one choice.
Think about it.  
If madigan couldn't sway may issue do you think Quinn and Co. can?
Kwame bill is dead and the bill that passed in the house can't be amended by the senate.
It's checkmate

Edited by KarlJ, Today, 11:18 AM.

[WindyCityGuy]

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

[22cal]

This morning 780 a.m. radio had recording of Quinn saying that he's going to do everything in his power to stop this in the Senate. They say Monday but that's Memorial Day will they be working?

[handyflyer]

WindyCityGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 11:11 AM, said:

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

I think you hit the nail right on the head.

[KarlJ]

22cal, on 25 May 2013 - 11:15 AM, said:

This morning 780 a.m. radio had recording of Quinn saying that he's going to do everything in his power to stop this in the Senate. They say Monday but that's Memorial Day will they be working?

The senate is in session Monday.
Madiga, with all his power couldn't get may issue in the house and he openly admits it.
What could Quinn possibly accomplish?
He's just going through the motions.

[Phatty]

"The Cliff" is by far the most attractive option right now for Chicago.  They could keep all of their gun laws and pass their own no-carry bill.  Sure, it might be struck down by the courts in a few years, but that's still a lot of additional time they buy. And even if their own law gets tossed out, they keep home rule control over gun laws.

That's why the smartest play for them is to simply do everything they can to keep Madigan's bill from obtaining a super-majority in the Senate.  Even if it means no carry law at all gets passed, they still come out on top.

[KarlJ]

WindyCityGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 11:11 AM, said:

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

I think the bill will pass as is. It was a compromise to give Cook the restricted areas they wanted.  We had to make some sacrifices and so does cook.
The gun laws in the state are going to have to be universal for it to work.

[Rabble]

handyflyer, on 25 May 2013 - 11:18 AM, said:

WindyCityGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 11:11 AM, said:

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

I think you hit the nail right on the head.

That is exactly what is going to happen. Probably via the Raoul bill, freshly amended.  Madigan has proved he is boss, now he will dole out concessions as favors. So what is our position on that?

If all Dem factions unite on that, it's game set match.

[bigdiogi]

chidiver, on 25 May 2013 - 10:50 AM, said:

....If Raoul were to amend his bill to be the exact text of 997 with no edits, which would you support and why?

...

As much as I found to hate about this bill when I first perused it, I'll stick with 2193 (did get the number right, I hope.) It has grown on me, like that ugly little dog at the shelter.

Honestly, as a downstater, I'm not turning cartwheels about what the new bill gains me. But when you consider the national implications... This is a fight for our country's future, not just for where we can pack. Anything that punches a small hole in the statist balloon is cherries to me. Maybe Chicago will become the shining beacon for LA, Boston, and NY.

Hey, it could happen.

[03rev]

I'll add to the record I'm not from Chicago but I'll stick to 2193 also

[Chicago Guy 77]

handyflyer, on 25 May 2013 - 11:18 AM, said:

WindyCityGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 11:11 AM, said:

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

I think you hit the nail right on the head.

The Senate can't  even add a amendment to this bill, so how can they remove the AWB/CFP? They can't! Either the Senate wait to call it for a vote to see if Their bill pass or just vote on this bill!

[chidiver]

Chicago Guy 77, on 25 May 2013 - 12:57 PM, said:

handyflyer, on 25 May 2013 - 11:18 AM, said:

WindyCityGuy, on 25 May 2013 - 11:11 AM, said:

I am betting the Madigan included the elimination of Chicago/Cook county's AWB/CFP etc as something he can trade if he stalls in the Senate.  He has shown Chicago what he can do and they have already backed off their Demands that Chicago has a different carry law as a result.  

My prediction is the bill passes with preemption but they remove the provision that eliminates all home rule gun laws and Chicago keeps their AWB/ CFP crap.

I think you hit the nail right on the head.

The Senate can't  even add a amendment to this bill, so how can they remove the AWB/CFP? They can't! Either the Senate wait to call it for a vote to see if Their bill pass or just vote on this bill!

They can just strip and amend Raoul's bill.  Pass it (if they can). Then send it to the house. There's lots of sneaky tools available. Just not a lot of time.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[RoadyRunner]

We need to keep pressing the Senators to stop their may issue bill from being called for a vote. Technically, if they do that it would be sent to the house. However, they could amend it to match the new language - sending it back to the Senate for an up/down concurrence vote again. Two bills, same language.

It would be on Cullerton if we go over the cliff.

However, the Senate could gut any number of already approved House bills and replace with his language. That would arrive in the house for an up or down concurrence vote.

Then we have dueling bills - with the cliff approaching.

[vezpa]

Someone please tell Quinn that when you find yourself in a hole, quit digging.

.

[BackForward]

chidiver, on 25 May 2013 - 10:33 AM, said:

2. Here's a fun question..don't you think the political gun grabbers would prefer the original 997 (as is..no changes/"fixes") to the current bill?  They retain power, beat Madigan at his own game, keep silly homerule registration/tax laws (for now!) BUT make downstate happy with real, statewide shall-issue carry. Madigan's bill is interesting..it isn't a big CC victory for us, but it IS a crushing political defeat for the gun grabbers. I think this might be the politically brilliant countermove against Madigan and its the lesser of two evils from their power-wielding point of view.  Unfortunately, I don't think they can put their gun grabbiness and NRA hatred aside for this interesting play and would try to "fix" the bill..thereby dooming it (and Madigan knows this).

997 had the same shall issue/override home rule as the recent bill that passed, so there would be no gain for them to support that bill over Madigan's. Madigan was successful in making the bill as restrictive as he possibly could.
My guess is that they will bring the high cap mag ban bill up for a vote shortly, and/or Madigan will give is assurance that it will pass if they go along with his bill.

[SAXD9]

Raoul's bill is already a house bill.  They could just add another amendment to that one and then send it to the house in order to have dueling bills.

[KarlJ]

The house only has 30 votes for a may issue bill. That fact has been emphasized by Speaker Madigan
Kwames bill is a no go
May issue is a no go
Supposedly the cliff is a no go
What's left is the bill that passed out of the house with 85 votes and the speakers praises.
This bill can not be amended. It's an up or down vote.
Any bans will have to be passed in a separate piece of legislation.
Y'all speculate all you want.
I see this as check mate.
SB2193 is the law of the land