Jump to content


View new content?


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 Lou

    Resident Old Guy

  • Members
  • 9,171 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 13 July 2012 - 05:43 AM

For the past few days the "view new content" button doesn't seem to work for me. What can I be doing wrong?
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."-- Benjamin Franklin

#2 abolt243

    Tim Bowyer

  • Moderator
  • 10,861 posts
  • Joined: 30-April 07

Posted 13 July 2012 - 07:09 AM

I went through a spell of that too. I finally tracked it to the filters I had inadverdently checked on the left side of the "New Content" screen.  Somehow I had them screwed up and wasn't getting much if anything to show as "new".  I reset some of them and made it better.

Hope that gives you something to check anyway!

Tim
Are you a member of the ISRA?? If not, why not?? Join over 18,000 other Illinois gun owners in the fight for your rights!!!

The Roman Empire fell due to a large, corrupt government, overspending, an overextended military, insecure borders, and the illegal immigration of Goths, barbarians (anyone who was not educated), and religious fanatics. Sound familiar?


"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams

Luke 11:21 - "When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed." NASB


#3 Lou

    Resident Old Guy

  • Members
  • 9,171 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 04

Posted 13 July 2012 - 08:15 AM

Thanks Tim.  I'll give that a try,


Edit -- That was it Tim.  Thanks again

Edited by Lou, 13 July 2012 - 08:18 AM.

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. -George Orwell

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."-- Benjamin Franklin

#4 XJCraver

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 11

Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:12 PM

Is the New Content supposed to "time out"?  I'll try to explain....

I click on IC, then I click on "View New Content", and a list of threads comes up.  I read a thread, click the "back" button on my Windows browser, and sometimes it goes back to the list of threads, and sometimes it comes up blank and says "No new content".  No rhyme nor reason to it - sometimes I can read 6 or 8 threads before it "blanks", other times I only read one, then click back and the new content is gone.  Very frustrating.....

The only filter I have selected is "content I have not read".

Edited by XJCraver, 13 July 2012 - 04:13 PM.


#5 Mr. Fife

    Nip it

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 2,688 posts
  • Joined: 03-July 10

Posted 15 July 2012 - 12:19 PM

This just happened to me.
Have all boated who fish? Have all boated who fish?

#6 XJCraver

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 11

Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:32 PM

Happened again today.  Anybody have any ideas??

#7 pyre400

    Political opinions expressed are always my own.

  • Admin
  • 7,215 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 09

Posted 17 July 2012 - 08:51 PM

I'm not sure.  I haven't had this problem since the load balancer config was corrected, several months ago.

This may be something to do with cookie expiration, but I dont have an explanation as to how the "back" button triggers the condition.

I'll start with the typical question

1.  Browser type and version? (example:  Internet Explorer 9,  or Firefox 13)

Also, when it happens - take note of the time and how many users are on when the incident occurs.  I'm curious if the issue happens under load.

__________________
R[∃vo˩]ution


#8 XJCraver

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 11

Posted 18 July 2012 - 06:27 AM

Windows 7, IE 9.  I'll look at user activity next time, but I'm not leaning towards a load problem.  It's happened at 6 in the evening when this place is packed, and at 2 in the morning when it's dead.  Cookies are cleaned weekly, hasn't seemed to help.

On another note - This is the only forum where this issue presents itself.  Several others that run this (or very similar) software function fine on my machine.

#9 pyre400

    Political opinions expressed are always my own.

  • Admin
  • 7,215 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 09

Posted 18 July 2012 - 07:38 AM

View PostXJCraver, on 18 July 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:

Windows 7, IE 9.  I'll look at user activity next time, but I'm not leaning towards a load problem.  It's happened at 6 in the evening when this place is packed, and at 2 in the morning when it's dead.  Cookies are cleaned weekly, hasn't seemed to help.

On another note - This is the only forum where this issue presents itself.  Several others that run this (or very similar) software function fine on my machine.

The cookies are used to identify the relative "new content" based on what you've looked at.  Granted, based on what you've said, you should only see the problem once a week.  If you have some other, more aggressive, cookie policy, that might be the culprit.  I think that Abolt is using the same setup ie9/w7.

I guess I'll be showing up for a week or 2 using ie9 on win7.  I'll let you know if I reproduce the issue.

Thanks for confirming about the load too..

__________________
R[∃vo˩]ution


#10 Xwing

    Member

  • Members
  • 4,267 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 09

Posted 18 July 2012 - 08:11 AM

View Postpyre400, on 17 July 2012 - 08:51 PM, said:

I'm not sure. I haven't had this problem since the load balancer config was corrected, several months ago.

This site is load-balanced across multiple servers? That surprises me. It must get a lot more traffic than I thought. One decent-sized web front end can handle quite a lot of "view" traffic and even a good amount of concurrent transactional (e.g. posting) operations. I assume it's on VMs. What are the WFE specs?
Or is it just LB for high availability, not for performance?
NRA Lifetime Member
IGOLD 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013
CCW Laws:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Posted anti-gun business listing:  (Android), (iPhone/iPad)
Illinois Government: (Android), (iPhone/iPad)

#11 XJCraver

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 11

Posted 18 July 2012 - 08:45 AM

View Postpyre400, on 18 July 2012 - 07:38 AM, said:

View PostXJCraver, on 18 July 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:

Windows 7, IE 9.  I'll look at user activity next time, but I'm not leaning towards a load problem.  It's happened at 6 in the evening when this place is packed, and at 2 in the morning when it's dead.  Cookies are cleaned weekly, hasn't seemed to help.

On another note - This is the only forum where this issue presents itself.  Several others that run this (or very similar) software function fine on my machine.

The cookies are used to identify the relative "new content" based on what you've looked at.  Granted, based on what you've said, you should only see the problem once a week.  If you have some other, more aggressive, cookie policy, that might be the culprit.  I think that Abolt is using the same setup ie9/w7.

I guess I'll be showing up for a week or 2 using ie9 on win7.  I'll let you know if I reproduce the issue.

Thanks for confirming about the load too..



No problem.  Thanks for trying to help me figure it out.  :thumb:

#12 pyre400

    Political opinions expressed are always my own.

  • Admin
  • 7,215 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 09

Posted 18 July 2012 - 09:21 AM

View PostXwing, on 18 July 2012 - 08:11 AM, said:

This site is load-balanced across multiple servers? That surprises me. It must get a lot more traffic than I thought. One decent-sized web front end can handle quite a lot of "view" traffic and even a good amount of concurrent transactional (e.g. posting) operations. I assume it's on VMs. What are the WFE specs?
Or is it just LB for high availability, not for performance?

Yes, it is LB/HA (active server/fault tolerance).

The site serves as a reliable source for many.  So, whenever we would have a significant vote or ruling, the site would nearly crash due to the load.  In fact, Chris and I had to do a fair amount of scrambling in May 2011 just to keep things responding within 15/30 seconds.  Since the load balancer configuration was implemented, we have been able to handle the heaviest traffic without any issue whatsoever.  The forum software upgrade has also helped to some extent.  ..but yea, you'd get 300 anxious folks, concurrently hammering the "view new content" button, and things would start shutting down on the old server.

We are are actually running on physical HW.  These services are provided to us by our top notch provider, TechPro  http://techpro.com

__________________
R[∃vo˩]ution


#13 XJCraver

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 335 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 11

Posted 19 July 2012 - 05:50 AM

Again, this morning.  29 members, 31 guests online.  Aggravating......

#14 pyre400

    Political opinions expressed are always my own.

  • Admin
  • 7,215 posts
  • Joined: 14-March 09

Posted 19 July 2012 - 07:47 AM

View PostXJCraver, on 19 July 2012 - 05:50 AM, said:

Again, this morning. 29 members, 31 guests online. Aggravating......

Do you consistently log into a single machine?

Or do you log in from home at night, at work in the morning, and then via a wireless at lunch?  I think your issue may be the result of switching various machines.  If this is the case, are you using win7/IE9 on all of them?

__________________
R[∃vo˩]ution





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users