tech141 Posted January 16, 2009 at 08:04 PM Posted January 16, 2009 at 08:04 PM Last ActionDate Chamber Action 1/14/2009 House Referred to Rules Committee Statutes Amended In Order of Appearance 430 ILCS 65/13.1 from Ch. 38, par. 83-13.1 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Provides that a county, including a home rule county, may not require registration of firearms or impose greater restrictions or limitations on the acquisition, possession, transportation, carrying, and transfer of firearms, firearm attachments, and firearm ammunition than are imposed by the Act and the Criminal Code of 1961. Effective immediately. Actions Date Chamber Action 1/13/2009 House Prefiled with Clerk by Rep. Harry R. Ramey, Jr. 1/14/2009 House First Reading 1/14/2009 House Referred to Rules Committee http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus...ID=76&GA=96
Bill Matio Posted November 27, 2009 at 01:56 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 01:56 PM Wondering how this bill is doing? Does anyone know? Last action was on 4/3/2009 House Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
Lou Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:05 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:05 PM Wondering how this bill is doing? Does anyone know? Last action was on 4/3/2009 House Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee Basically that means it's DOA.
Bill Matio Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:06 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:06 PM Wondering how this bill is doing? Does anyone know? Last action was on 4/3/2009 House Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee Basically that means it's DOA.What can we do to resurrect it from the dead? Anything?
GarandFan Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:28 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:28 PM Wondering how this bill is doing? Does anyone know? Last action was on 4/3/2009 House Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee Basically that means it's DOA.What can we do to resurrect it from the dead? Anything? All you can do at this point is write or call Ramey and ask him to reintroduce the bill next time. Of course Ramey isn't the only one who can file the bill.
abolt243 Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:30 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:30 PM What can we do to resurrect it from the dead? Anything? It made it through second reading, several notes filed that were returned, then the sponsors felt that they didn't have the votes to pass it so they didn't call it for third reading. As it affects Home Rule ordinances, it will require a 3/5 majority vote. If the sponsors feel that they have support, they'll reintroduce it when the legislature re-convenes in January. Stick around. When the Legislature fires back up in Jan, you'll see what we can do to encourage or discourage certain legislation. For now, get your local legislators phone and fax numbers in your speed dial, get their e-mails in your address book, make personal contact with them if possible to begin a relationship building process. All of them are in campaign mode now until Feb 2. AB
Tvandermyde Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:54 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 02:54 PM Guys read the whole status board. This was the Cook County preemption bill. We called it for a vote, and came within 4 votes of a super-majority. Since we didn't want out super-majoity roll call on the board for the other side to see, we dumped the roll call and put it on postponed consideration. We are working on it, McDonald just might de-nut cook county but we'll have to wait and see.
Bill Matio Posted November 27, 2009 at 05:28 PM Posted November 27, 2009 at 05:28 PM Guys read the whole status board. This was the Cook County preemption bill. We called it for a vote, and came within 4 votes of a super-majority. Since we didn't want out super-majoity roll call on the board for the other side to see, we dumped the roll call and put it on postponed consideration. We are working on it, McDonald just might de-nut cook county but we'll have to wait and see.Thanks!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.