Jump to content

BIGDEESUL

Members
  • Posts

    7,049
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,098 profile views

BIGDEESUL's Achievements

Member

Member (24/24)

  1. Contact Elmer Fudd. He knows the entire process, inside and out, and upside down. From what I remember, although it's written in the law, there's almost no recourse other than paying a lawyer to deal with the ISP. Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
  2. Misinformation at the driver services facility will never be fixed. You'll have to wait until next weekend to help him with his foid app. The new electronic app system doesn't go live until Monday if I remember correctly.
  3. Wow. Many resurrections with this thread! Might as well get in. http://tapatalk.imageshack.com/v2/14/11/05/55ceacd09e059c1a1b1288cac86601f5.jpg
  4. Yes mikec, you can store your firearm in your vehicle while in the forest preserve. The safe harbor provision for parking lots still applies.
  5. I think he meant he turned 18 a week before the incident he was charged for.
  6. Lol sorry, I misread your post. I thought you said you're new to this state, not new to this site. Lol Yeah, that may be a problem.
  7. If it happened in another state, since it was a misdemeanor you might be ok. Honestly only time will tell. You may have to get it expunged from your record if possible, then reapply. I'm sure Molly or Todd will chime in on this one with more info.
  8. It would go away if they'd just take a damn case and rule already.
  9. Sorry, didn't mean to be unfriendly. I'm so used to people being jerks here that it's easy to misinterpret a sincere question. Have a good day too, and I apologize if I offended you.
  10. The law does say that. Rather clearly. Sec 65c: A licensee shall not be in violation of this Section while he or she is traveling along a public right of way that touches or crosses any of the premises under subsection (a), (a-5), or (a-10) of this Section if the concealed firearm is carried on his or her person in accordance with the provisions of this Act or is being transported in a vehicle by the licensee in accordance with all other applicable provisions of law. (a-10) The owner of private real property of any type may prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms on the property under his or her control. The owner must post a sign in accordance with subsection (d) of this Section indicating that firearms are prohibited on the property, unless the property is a private residence. Carried on a public right of way or transported in a vehicle is an exception to the prohibited areas. The ONLY exception to the prohibited areas. The only thing that mentions the uuw/auuw transport exceptions is the part about possessing the license, and that is the only thing it addresses, is when you need your license and when you don't. It never authorizes transport in in a gfz. Sec. 65 a-10 specifies that a compliant posted sign indicates that firearms are prohibited on the property, period. There's no exception for transport.
  11. Reread my post. I said public transportation IMO is OK to transport, while the other prohibited locations with posted signage it Is not. Not sure what part confused you, but you should try not to be confused so easily.
  12. Public transportation yes. Other prohibited areas no. It's a gray area right now until there's some case law, but as an instructor I suggest not to transport in a gfz. No guns means no guns. Others will tell you different but better to be safe than sorry.
  13. If you've received an NRA basic pistol certificate as part of your concealed carry training, you can use it to apply for the Arizona permit which is $60 and will allow you to carry in over 30 states with no additional training.
  14. I include Arizona application materials in my classes. It's the easiest and cheapest way to carry in Wisconsin, along with multiple others. Arizona is only $60 as compared to Florida, and doesn't require additional training like Utah. Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk
  15. You and me both; I am a CO resident. One, and only one, thing must happen for CO to recognize the IL permit of IL residents: IL must recognize the CO permit. That's the only requirement; no reciprocity agreement nor other formal document is required. So it's up to IL to make it happen. What? Marijuana is legal there! This state will rob someone of their 2a rights for being a medical user. We can't have permit holders from a stoner state running around over here! (Purple) Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...