writ 'em all up and I will be on them tuesday monring. but be prepared to start beating on you're reps and senators
Todd, your work on this has been very important and very appreciated.
However, I humbly ask you not to "pester" the ISP with questions of no consequence. The last thing we need now is to have them stop everything now and start completely over, causing huge delays, simply because people don't understand one or two things.
IE: Definition of the 4 safety rules and "public storage" would be nice to ensure we are compliant. But, these redundant questions about DD-214, Basic Pistol, etc counting for the first 8 hours even if they did not cover everything on the ISPs outline should not be raised. Right now we have options and more freedom. Making the ISP rethink things may result is less.
What would happen if the question "military training/basic pistol/hunter safety did not cover 'vehicle storage/only covered 3 base safety rules/ (or whatever)', so where do we need to add those topics in the second 8 hrs?" Do you think the ISP is going to modify their outline, or could they / would they more simply say that hunter safety / Basic Pistol can not be used to grandfather training hours?
My point is, lets ensure the answers to the questions that we raise have a high probability of moving us in the direction that we want to move; not the direction Colleen Daley wants us to move...
Edited by bobapunk, 01 September 2013 - 09:17 AM.