ILgunguy Posted March 18, 2021 at 09:27 PM Share Posted March 18, 2021 at 09:27 PM Probably won't hear about this on the MSM. Sacramento Bee: Becerra quietly admits failure of gun registration website, halts California investigations.https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article250037879.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted March 18, 2021 at 10:09 PM Share Posted March 18, 2021 at 10:09 PM ... Under the terms of the settlement filed Wednesday in U.S. Eastern District Court in Sacramento, the state Department of Justice is required to notify each district attorney and law enforcement agency to put on hold “all pending investigations and prosecutions” for those suspected of failing to register their assault weapons. ... So the registration requirement hasn't been scrapped. There's just a moratorium until they can figure out how to make it work. Oh, well, celebrate the small victories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
357 Posted March 18, 2021 at 11:39 PM Share Posted March 18, 2021 at 11:39 PM What is an assault weapon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted March 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM Share Posted March 18, 2021 at 11:56 PM So the registration requirement hasn't been scrapped. There's just a moratorium until they can figure out how to make it work.Oh, well, celebrate the small victories. Nope, it appears it will return in full force after they 'catch up' on registrations, it would not surprise me to see a déjà vu settlement in IL soon in regards to the FOID and CCL delays. Under the settlement, the Department of Justice agrees to pay $151,000 for gun rights groups’ legal fees, and it is required after a 120-day public notice period to reopen assault weapon registrations for three months to give those who tried to register before the 2018 deadline to do so free from being penalized. The settlement also requires the agency to provide gun owners with the option of filling out their registration on paper forms, instead of online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted March 19, 2021 at 12:02 AM Share Posted March 19, 2021 at 12:02 AM What is an assault weapon?Whatever they define it as. Eventually it will be everything except a smooth-bore muzzle-loader less than .45 caliber. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
357 Posted March 19, 2021 at 01:27 AM Share Posted March 19, 2021 at 01:27 AM What is an assault weapon? Whatever they define it as. Eventually it will be everything except a smooth-bore muzzle-loader less than .45 caliber.Exactly. Everything they want to ban they call it assault weapon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defaultdotxbe Posted March 19, 2021 at 12:17 PM Share Posted March 19, 2021 at 12:17 PM That's why Feinstein's bill "exempts" so many firearms that wouldn't have been covered under the ban anyway; the plan is to expand the ban until only those "exempted" firearms are allowed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted March 19, 2021 at 02:30 PM Share Posted March 19, 2021 at 02:30 PM That's why Feinstein's bill "exempts" so many firearms that wouldn't have been covered under the ban anyway; the plan is to expand the ban until only those "exempted" firearms are allowed Isn't that kind of what California has now, you can only purchased firearms that are on their approved list. New firearms can take a while or never to get on. This can be a simple handgun that the manufacture does not deem worth the costs to get sold in CA, a no safety version may and a safety may not. Last I heard from the grumblings of my friends that have mostly now left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defaultdotxbe Posted March 19, 2021 at 03:16 PM Share Posted March 19, 2021 at 03:16 PM That's why Feinstein's bill "exempts" so many firearms that wouldn't have been covered under the ban anyway; the plan is to expand the ban until only those "exempted" firearms are allowed Isn't that kind of what California has now, you can only purchased firearms that are on their approved list. New firearms can take a while or never to get on. This can be a simple handgun that the manufacture does not deem worth the costs to get sold in CA, a no safety version may and a safety may not. Last I heard from the grumblings of my friends that have mostly now left. Just for handguns, but yes, only "exempted" handguns are available for sale in CA unless you are a cop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.