Jump to content


Hatfield vs Sessions U.S. District Court, Southern Dist. of IL

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 17,676 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 30 April 2018 - 08:49 PM

Even though Hatfield received a small fine and no prison time for his non-violent statutory felony, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) bans him from owning a gun. That statute makes it unlawful for a person to possess a gun if they have
been convicted of a crime that is technically punishable by more than one year (i.e. a felony)—regardless of the sentence that the individual actually received. Since making a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a) is punishable by up to five years, Hatfield falls within the gambit of § 922(g)(1).


He argues that the Government does not have an important interest in banning non-violent felons who received no prison time like him from having a gun. Hatfield also points out that while every state he researched has some sort of process to restore Second Amendment rights to felons on a case-by-case basis, the federal government does not. Curiously, 18 U.S.C. § 925© does provide a similar mechanism for a federal felon to restore their Second Amendment rights through an application to the Attorney General, but Congress has chosen to not fund § 925© since the early 1900s.


So for the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment by Jefferson B. Sessions, III, in his Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the United States (Doc. 41), GRANTS Larry Edward Hatfield’s motion for summary judgment (See Docs. 47, 48); and DECLARES that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment as-applied to Larry Edward Hatfield: a non-violent felon who received no prison time for his offense.


DATED: APRIL 26, 2018




Attached File  Hatfield vs Sessions.pdf   329.51KB   629 downloads

"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#2 Gamma


  • Members
  • 2,585 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 13

Posted 30 April 2018 - 09:40 PM

I was about to post this, it was discussed on another forum.

It's too bad they couldn't have filed the non-resident carry ban litigation in this judge's district.

There's a lot of red meat in the decision for gun rights proponents, but there's a great quote that deserves notice:

This type of logical inconsistency shows that the Government is not taking the Second Amendment seriously. The Second Amendment has to mean something as a matter of law, policy debates aside. Overbroad policies ignoring a constitutional amendment are inexcusable.

Overbroad policies ignoring a Constitutional Amendment describes the entirety of Illinois firearms law and regulatory agency attitude.
Illinois' FCCA is a prime example of the maxim that sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

#3 lockman


  • Members
  • 8,473 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 06

Posted 01 May 2018 - 06:04 AM

Just another decision showing the schizophrenic behavior of the state. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

"We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1776

Life Member NRA, ISRA,  CCRKBA, GOA, & SAF

#4 Just some guy


  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 165 posts
  • Joined: 10-May 16

Posted 02 May 2018 - 08:29 AM

It seems that, on the bottom of page 10, the AG didn't put much effort into presenting his case. That could be interpreted as supporting Hatfield. The AG was required to reply to the motion and merely "went through the motions".  Am I reading between the lines too much?

Fast is fine, accurate is final.

#5 speedbump


  • Members
  • 1,270 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 13

Posted 31 May 2018 - 11:17 PM

Judge Phil Gilbert is a pretty smart cookie in most instances.
"The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

~Frederick Douglass~

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users